3: External Validity Flashcards
Population validity
Do the research findings obtained from a sample apply to the population of interest
Ecological validity
Do the research findings reflect what people do in the real world
-influenced by subject reactivity, research setting or how variables are operationalized
Population of interest
All individuals to whom we desire to generalize the findings of a research study
(Census: includes every member of a population)
Sample
Smaller subgroup of subjects chosen from the population
Representative sample
Closely match various chanarterisitcs of the population of interest
- allows to generalize to population from which drawn
- important for characteristics that affect studied variables
Biased
When sample characteristics don’t match those of population
- stems from nonrandom procedures
- attempt to generalize outside a biased sample may be misleading or inaccurate
Steps in sample selection
- Recruitment: risk for sample bias
• only part of target population will be accessible (sampling frame)
• may not reflect POI
• reach potential participants in some way (contacted sample) so aware of possibility - Enrollment: risk for non-response or volunteer bias
• inclusion/ exclusion criteria
• eligible part. Choose to part. Or decline
Sampling bias
If contacted sample is not representative of target population
Volunteer bias
Is participants are systematically different from non-participants
Random sampling
Every member of POI has equal chance of chosen
-generates a representative sample, so generalized to population drawn
- requires a directory of sampling frame (delivery sequence file, phone book, list of area codes)
- assign numbers to each record
- then use probability sampling, and a random number generator
Nonrandom sampling
Every member of POI interest does not have same chance of being chosen
-will be biased or unrep. So must be cautious when generazlizing
Probability sampling
Use at least one element of random sampling to ensure representative
-crucial for frequency claims, external v important
Simple random sampling
Randomly sample subset of individuals from population
-reduces sampling bias, but guarantee representative sample
• some segments over or under-represented by chance or method of recruitment
Stratified random sampling
Population first divided into demo. Strata
• random sample of proportionate size Ns is drawn from each startum
(Each Ns is proportional to percentage of POI in each strata)
•ensures sample representative of demo strata even if diff sizes
Oversampling
•population first divided into demo. Strata.
•a random sample of some fixed n is drawn from each
-smaller strata will be over-represented
- results later weighed according to proportion
•ensures small strata are sampled adequately
Systematic sampling
From a directory of POI, randomly choose a starting point and interval k
• every Kth element after starting point is sampled
Cluster sampling
- units of sampling are groups rather than individuals
- clusters randomly sampled from all clusters in population
- all individuals within chosen cluster are included
- useful when v large populations
Multistage cluster
- cluster sampling followed by another sampling technique
1. Randomly choose large clusters
2. Randomly sample individuals from within those randomly chosen clusters (using simple,stratified, oversampling, systematic)
Convience sampling
Sample is drawn from a more restricted sub population that is easy to access
-in sampling bias if convience sample is systematically differnt from POI
-findings may not generalize to other types of people or other types of students
Self selection
Enrolling only those who invite themselves
-results in non-response or volunteer bias if diff from POI
Biased sampling techniques
-conscience sampling
-relying on self-selection
-recruiting materials don’t cover population
-other bias sampling (not random):
Purposive: nonrandomly target certain kinds of ppl
Snowball: ask enrolled part. To recruits others in their social networks
Quota: nonrandom within each stratum until reaching target number of that stratum
Lab studies
- generally afford greatest control over EV (higher degree of internal validity)
- artificial environment (questionable ecological)
Field studies
-conducted outside lab, in real world
(High degree of ecological validity)
-difficult to control EV in field (difficult internal validity)
Naturalistic observations
Observe and record naturally occurring behavior in field (no manipulation)
-not used to support causal claims low internal validity
Field experiment
Test for casual relationships outside lab by manipulating variables in field
- attempt to control EV to degree possible
- diffciult to control EV, threatening internal and causal
Lab simulations
Attempt to recreate the real world setting in lab
-able to study behavior under more realistic conditions (increasing ecological) mailing control EV
(Greater realism increase generalizability)
-lab simulations used instead of a field study when:
•internal is essential but difficult to ensure in field
•behavior cannot be ethically studied
•under naturally occurring conditions is expensive and time consuming