2C Religious Responses (Irenaean) Flashcards
Irenaeus: Why does evil exist?
- A deliberate action of an omnibenevolent God so that humans can grow to be spiritually perfect, as we have been made imperfect.
- Certain moral qualities are intrinsic to humans but second-order goods (e.g. compassion, courage, forgiveness) can only develop as a response to evil
- ∴ evil = necessary facet of life
- Evil allows us to appreciate good as ‘good’ is a qualitative judgement so there must be other, less good things for goodness to exist at all
- Ability to freely choose to do good = instrumental in achieving God’s purpose for his creation
Irenaeus: What do humans need to grow from?
The image to the likeness of God
Irenaeus: What is the difference between the image and the likeness of God?
- Image: Possessing potential qualities of God’s spiritual perfection + having free will
- Likeness: Actualising the qualities
Irenaeus: How do we develop into the likeness of God?
- Through trials/tribulations of everyday life
- For every good choice made in a moral situation, the individual develops more fully towards spiritual maturity
- We must overcome difficulties, cope with our imperfections/limitations, and resist temptation to do wrong
Irenaeus: We can only be in the likeness of God…
- …after death.
* Essential part of his theodicy = everyone should live after death
What analogy did Irenaeus use to explain goodness?
- God = craftsman; humans = material
- Humans should allow God to mould them into perfection by acting in faith and allowing good/bad experiences to make us a perfectly crafted item
Irenaeus: What happens to those that resist God?
- Punished in the next life
- God’s mercy continues into the next life ∴ the individuals will have the opportunity to earn his forgiveness and develop spiritual perfection
- This eschatological verification for evil allows God to remain good in the face of temporary suffering experienced by creation
How did Hick develop Irenaeus’ theodicy?
• In his book, ‘Evil and the God of Love’, describes it as a soul-making theodicy
Hick: Explain soul-making.
- He put forward John Keats’ idea of the world being a “vale of soul-making”
- A process where the soul is developing towards spiritual perfection by gaining the wisdom to make the correct choices in moral situations when faced with the ambiguities of life
- The world is a proving ground to earn salvation, not simply by belief in a saviour figure
Hick: How can humans be truly free?
- We had to be created at an epistemic distance from God
- Humans are placed in a world where the existence and non-existence of God = equally likely
- True human freedom exists in terms of how they respond to God
Hick: Why could God not create humans who were spiritually perfect?
• Goodness developed through free choice is more valuable than goodness that is “ready-made”
Hick: Why could God not create humans who were immediately aware of his existence?
- Restricts choices
* The feeling of always being watched would mean that we make decisions in this light
Describe the challenge to the concept of universal salvation through eschatological verification.
- It is unjust
- If we will all eventually achieve perfection, how does this encourage good behaviour in this life?
- Undermines efforts to develop spiritual maturity.
- Do we have the free will to refuse spiritual development?
Describe the challenge to evil and suffering being used as a tool.
- Suffering should never be used as an instrument by an omnibenevolent God
- More akin to abuse than love
- Could the greater good not be achieved w/o it?
- Seems to make the role of Jesus as a saviour superfluous/redundant/unnecessary.
- Why should the natural environment be created in a slow, pain-filled process?
Describe the challenge to the immensity and unequal distribution of evil and suffering.
- Immense suffering does not make up for any possible reward of spiritual perfection.
- Suffering is not evenly-spread which implies inconsistency with God’s mechanism of perfection. Will those in Africa receive ‘better’ treatment in the afterlife?
- Does the end justify the means?
- Intensity of suffering makes it a ‘soul-breaking’ theodicy