22) Summits between the USA and USSR Flashcards
why did the USSR want summits?
-Gorbachev recognised that nuclear weapons did not equal guaranteed security
-New thinking policy, security achieved through political and economic processes not nuclear/the two superpowers should work together towards a common goal
-G wanted to end the cold war, it was very expensive
Why did the USA want summits
-believed in G’s new thinking policies
-Reagan wanted to change American-Soviet relations
-fear of nuclear war
Geneva Summit
-November 1985
-Discussed restrictions on nuclear weapons such as the ban of chemical weapons, an agreement to cut offensive nuclear weapons by 50% and limits on medium range missiles
Impact of the Geneva summit
-limited, it had no concrete outcomes and Reagans SDI plans caused tension
-did remove the split between east and west as it reopened talks
Reykjavik summit
-October 1986
-tense summit, Reagan wanted an elimination of nuclear weapons but Gorbachev would not comply until Reagan abandoned his plans for SDI
-Made it clear that both sides did want arms reductions
impact of the Reykjavik Summit
-partial, they mainly discussed human rights
-valuable as each power gained an insight to what the others limits were (SDI)
Washington Summit
-December 1987
-Intermediate Range Nuclear Force treaty (INF) is signed
-huge step in ending the arms race
-INF, ban and destruction of all intermediate range ballistic and cruise missiles, first time the superpowers and agreed to ban a whole class of weapons
-British and French missiles not included
-USSR destroyed over 1000 missiles, the USA about 800
-G also announced his intentions to withdraw from Afghanistan at this summit
Impact of the Washington Summit
-Very good
-two major proclamations
-SDI no longer a huge factor
-people began to believe that tensions were truly ending
Moscow Summit
-May/June 1988
-focus on cultural exchanges
-Reagan’s last year in office
-signing of several agreements over fishing rights and student exchange programmes
Impact of the Moscow Summit
-Gave Reagan access to the Russian people, he spoke of freedom
-Gorbachev and Reagan walk together through Moscow
-START remains an issue
-Good for moral but no further nuclear agreements
what is SDI
An initiative proposed by Reagan in 1983 that could supposedly destroy ICBMs in space, before they reached their target. Thus ending nuclear monopoly as the USA would have the ultimate defence system
Support for SDI
-Reagan
-NATO leaders such as Thatcher and Helmut Kohl
Against SDI
-Soviets, continued to heavily fund their nuclear programs, leading to a lack of finances for the rest of the country
-Gorbachev, against it in summits, however he abandoned this perspective after a while and was forced to justify talks with the USA even though it seemed they were developing an Anti-Soviet weapons system
-before their support, France and England were sceptical it could work
Reality of SDI
-could not and would not every work, too expensive and ambitious of a programme
-nicknamed Star Wars by those inside the US (also a link to Reagan’s ‘Evil Empire’ talk)
-in march 1983, Reagan directed military/scientific/industrial communities in the US to research, only ever research
-still created lots of fear within the USSR as its creation would entirely tip the balance of the cold war
Summary of Bush
-liaison to PRC and director of the CIA, very experienced
-1989-1993
-had foreign success but wasn’t popular internally due to a failing economy and rising violence
-supported Gorbachev
-Sent troops to overthrow the ruling General in Panama
-Sent troops (via the UN) to Kuwait after Iraqi invasion, this proved successful