2.1 how did buhrs and those that run them change a’s england'? pt1 Flashcards
Give 5 features of Alfred’s ‘household’.
Household, witan, thegns, clergy, ealdormen, reeves.
What did the household form?
The central part of the gov.
Who was in the household?
A mixture of officials, servants and chapains.
Who did the household liaise (cooperate) with?
The witan.
Why was the household a ‘fluid’ institution? Therefore the household moved…
Individuals seemed to move in and out (TRANSITORY) of it depending on what Alfred required at any point of time. …around the kingdom.
What was there a lack of in the household? Why might this cause a problem?
Formal lines of communication between Alfred, household and the rest of the kingdom (a lot of the ealdormen couldn’t read)>messages would have to be passed on by 3rd parties.
What didn’t exist to support the governing process here? Therefore how was unity maintained? What does this link to?
Bureaucratic bodies to support what he did or thought>insufficient>unity was maintained by giving praise and punishment, depending on the actions of the individual>Alfred’s law code.
What did the Witan consist of?
Individuals who were trust worthy enough to advise the King on a variety of matters.
What is the Witangamont? Why was this weird?
Meeting of the witan to confirm a king. Rare to gather all of the ealdormen.
What matters did the Witan discuss?
Holy nature (SYNOD) and secular affairs (ASSEMBLY).
List 2 functions of the Witan.
-Discussion of local nature: land disputes, granting charters, attended by the ealdormen, bishop and others.
-Issues of wider nature: broader membership, discussed laws, how to deal with external threats.
Why did membership change often? (2)
According to what was being discussed and where the Witan was held.
What do some historians claim about Alfred’s assemblies of Witan and Household? What did they say that Alfred created? Why did people join these bodies?
Represented a form of parliament. A form of constitutional monarchy- to gain status and not to challenge the power of the King.
What was the reality of Alfred’s assemblies?
Large assemblies were infrequent and Alfred was quite and authoritarian, obscure monarch in how he ruled.
What does Anglo-Saxon Chronicle imply about all the individuals in Alfred’s court? Who might this have included?
All important officials in Alfred’s court were thegns (person of high rank who served the king). Bishops, ealdormen and reeves.