1.9 Personal control 1685+ Flashcards
who was madame de maintenon?
- the widow of a crippled comedy author
- became governor of Louis’ and Montespan’s children
- became the secret wife of Louis in 1683 after coming to Versailles in 1683
how was madame de maintenon described by others?
- the duc de saint-simon painted her as a rugthless schemer who feigned religious devotion to exploit Louis’ fear of sin
- the princess palatinate blamed her for almnost every royal blunder
- she was blamed by many for the downfall of Louis in his later years
in what two main ways did Maintenon exert personal influence over Louis?
- influenced his succession plans and ministerial appointments
- had control over Louis’ personal life
- she had soft spots for the ducs de maine and toulouse and encouraged Louis to make them princes of the blood
- stopped him having sex outside of marriage, encouraged him to have a more pious atmosphere at court, saw her role as central in ensuring Louis’ salvation
how did education demonstrate Maintenon’s control over Louis?
- she designed a boarding school at Saint Cyr and acted as school general director from 1686
- hired one of Louis' playwrights to write her a play for Saint Cyr’s schoolgrils that cost 14,000 livres
- she didn’t quite have full control of the school however
- it provided education for the daughters of impoverished nobles or those killed serving the state and therefore matched Louis’ obsession with regulated conformity
- Louis also selected the students and the building design as well as choogin the uniform and rules
how did religious decisions demonstrate Maintenon’s control over Louis?
- the papacy reportedly approached her as an informal diplomatic actor
- she supported the edict of fontainebleau and ecnouraged the destruction of port-royale but she was not instigator and others around Louis supported these policies (Le Tellier and Louvois for the Huguenots, Pontchartrait and others for the Jansenists)
how did Louis show control/a lack of control over Louvois
- Louis’ decline in health from 1687 meant Louvois could assume more personal control
- continued draggonade persecution and terrorised Huguenots
- authorised civilian atrocities in the palatinate region along France’s eastern border in 1688
- disregarded Louis’ refusal to approve the burning of the town of Treves in 1690 and issued the order himself, claiming it was to spare Louis’ conscience
- defied Louis’ order in 1691 as French troops besieged Mons with Louis in attendance
- however, after hearing of Louvois’ disobedience in 1689 Louis reportedly grabbed a pair of fireplace tongs and was only stopped from smashing Lousvois’ head in by Maintenon
- he overrode Louvois’ order and saved Treves from being burned in 1690
- sent Louvois to the Bastille for defying him in 1691 who died shortly after receiving the letter from shock/heart attack/stroke/poison?
- all investigation into Louvois’ death was suppressed
how was the paulette used to increase personal control?
- in 1701 the crown received 5.67 million livres through the paulette
- in 1702 the controleur general Chamillart ignored protests by the Parlement first president against paying another 5.67 million livres paulette and obtained the full payment after threatening to create new offices make up for any revenue shortfall
how did Louis use intendants to maintain his control outside of Paris?
- intendants were effective as they received annual ministerial instruction and constant scrutiny
- they filled multiple roles such as rooting out corruption, ensuring good relations between civilians and the military, overseeing local justice and enforcing anti-Huguenot policies
- they managed hand-outs for the poor after the 1694 famine and quashed grain riots in Lyon in 1690
what were limitations to Louis’ control over intendants?
- Brittany had no intendant until 1689
- they were overburdened and underpayed that meant they were corrupt as work was given to sub-delegates
- Louis couln’t enforce its three-year safeguarg and many intendants effectively monopolised their positions
what new tax policies were introduced and what were five limitations to Louis’ control over taxation?
the crown introduced the capitation (1695) and the dixieme (1710)
- corrupt officials embezzled public funds
- the capitation was only kept until 1699
- Alsace, Flanders and Franche-comte immediatley purchased exemptions: pays d’etats and imposition continually underpaid indirect taxes and didn’t have to pay the taille
- the dixieme gained Louis 96 million livres in 4 years but resulted in defiance of royal authority
- 75% of Augergne’s nobility refused to declare
to what extent did Louis have control over the Paris Parlement
he lost their support after dropping his gallican religious policies in 1693 and inviting papal condemnation of Janensenism (many of those in the parlement were Janesnist)
what were are the three estates of French society?
- the nobility
- the clergy
- the peasantry
bankers profited from Louis’ wars, elites were able to evade and exploit taxation, this left an increasingly disproportionate burden on the lower orders.
how were social divisions seen in the church?
- leadership was increasingly aristocratic
- aristocrats like Noailles were chosen for their silence and inaction over social problems
- the church did pay annyal don gratuits from 1688 to 1697 but it remained incredibly wealthy and undertaxed, avoiding paying the 1695 captitation and the 1710 dixieme
- in 1710 it paid 24 million livres to remove itself altogether from the dixieme
to what extent did France actually pay taxes?
- in around 66% of France nobles were completely or generally exempted from direct taxation
- most purchased exemptions to the capitation and dixieme immediately
- many regions actively avoided paying taxes by immediatley purchasing capitation exemptions such as Alsace, Franche-Comte and Flanders
- Alsace did the same for the dixieme
- anti-dixieme protests broke out in a number of regions
what effect did the war of spanish succession have on social divisions?
- it massively increased them
- it allowed bankers to profit through hyperinflationary money transfer charges
- in 1706 merchant bankers had a 101% handling fee for money going to Italy
- private financiers profited massively as seen in Desmaretz’s debts owed to others such as 28 million livres in interest owed on debts