17 - IV: Audit reports 2 Flashcards
PCAOB: evaluating consistency: What are 2 situations?
- Changes in accounting principles.
2. Restatements.
PCAOB: evaluating consistency: change in accounting principles: What are 4 matters that must be evaluated?
- Adopted principle is GAAP.
- Method is FASB.
- Disclosures are adequate.
- Alternative principle is justified as preferable.
PCAOB: evaluating consistency: change in accounting principles: What must the auditor do when 4 criteria met? Not met?
Met: Add an explanatory paragraph.
No: Treat the change as GAAP departure.
PCAOB: evaluating consistency: restatement: What must the auditor?
Add an explanatory paragraph.
Evaluate the adequacy of disclosures.
How is the change in classification treated?
Does not normally require mention in the report.
Opening balance: What are 2 objectives?
To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether
- Opening balance contain misstatements that materially affect the current periods FS.
- Accounting policies reflected in the opening balances have been consistently applied in the current period (or changes are appropriately accounted for and adequately presented/disclosed).
What is the definition of “initial audit engagement”?
- the FS for the prior period were not audited or
2. the FS for the prior period were audited by a predecessor auditor.
What is the definition of “opening balances”?
Existed at the beg of the period. Also includes matters requiring disclosure that existed at the beg of period, such as contingencies/commitments.
What is the definition of “reaudit”?
An initial audit engagement to audit FS that have been previously audited by a predecessor.
Opening balance: Audit procedures?
- Read most recent FS, predecessor’s audit report.
2. Request management to authorize the predecessor to respond fully to inquires and review his audit doc.
Opening balance: Evaluation 3 points?
- Determine whether the prior closing balances have been properly brought forward.
- Determine whether the opening balances reflect the application of appropriate accounting policies.
- Evaluate whether current period audit procedures provide evidence relevant to the opening balance (includes reviewing predecessor’s audit doc).
What must the auditor do if discovers possible MM in prior period FS? What if management refuses or the auditor is not satisfy with the resolution?
Request management to inform the predecessor and arrange a 3-way meeting.
Evaluate the implications to the current engagement.
Should the auditor reference the predecessor auditor as the partial basis for the opinion?
No. No division of responsibility.
Opening balance: If the auditor is not able to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, what should he do? If material misstatement is present?
Qualified or disclaimer of opinion.
Qualified or adverse opinion.
Is the auditor responsible to act appropriately when FS and report are included in other doc?
Yes.
Other info: Objective?
Respond appropriately when other info could undermine the credibility of FS and report.
What is the excluded item from “other info”?
Required supplemental information.
Press release. Cover letter.
What are examples of “other info”?
Report by management/those charges with governance.
ex: Financial summaries, ratios, highlights. Employment data. Planned capital expenditures, name of officers and directors, selected quarterly data.
Other info: What is the procedures?
Obtain and read the other info (preferably before report release date.
Other info: what must the auditor do if there is a material inconsistency (before release date)?
Determine whether FS or other info should be revised.
Other info: if management refuses to make the revision, what should the auditor do? (before release date).
- Communicate with those charged with governance.
2. May add an “other matter” paragraph, withhold report, or withdraw (if possible).
Other info: what must the auditor do if there is a material inconsistency (after release date)?
Determine whether FS or other info should be revised.
Other info: if management makes the revision, what should the auditor do? If refuse? (after release date).
Revised: Review steps taken by management to inform users.
Not revised: Inform those charged with governance (may seek legal counsel).
Other info: What must the auditor do if there is a material “misstatement of fact”?
- Discuss with management.
- Request management to consult with appropriate parties (ex: entity’s legal counsel).
- Notify those charged w/ governance if management refuses correction.
Other info: what is the example of disclaimer look like?
Other info is not a required part of the basic FS….not been subject to the auditing procedures applied…accordingly we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
Supplementary info: Objective when reporting on this matter?
Report on supplementary info in relation to the FS as a whole.
To evaluate the presentation whether it’s fairly stated, in all material respects, relation to the FS as a whole.
Supplementary info: What is the characteristic of the engagement to report on it?
- Auditor also audited FS.
- Either unmodified or qualified opinion was expressed.
- Supplementary info will accompany the audited FS or readily available.
- Supplementary info was derived from the record used to prepare FS.
- Supplementary info relates to the same period as FS.
Supplementary info: Audit procedures?
- Ask management: purpose of info/criteria used.
- Compiles w/ applicable criteria?
- Obtain an understanding of methods used (and whether those methods changed).
- Compare/reconcile to FS or to the underlying records used for FS.
- Ask management: sig assumptions used.
- Evaluate appropriateness relative to FS.
- Obtain written representations from management about responsibility, SI will be readily available, etc.
Supplementary info: Must the auditor issue a separate report on FS and supplementary info?
No. Either is ok.
Supplementary info: if the auditor issue a separate report on FS and SI, what must be done?
Cross reference.