1.2 Social Psychology Evaluation Points Flashcards

1
Q

Strength of authoritian personality for obedience

A

Elms and milgrim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strength and weakness for locus of control obedience

A

Oliner oliner
Schurz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strength and weakness for prejudice social norms

A

Filindra
Wetheral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strength and weakness of individualism and collectivism
Prejudice

A

Wetherell
Sherif

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strength and weakness for authoritarian personality prejudice

A

Cohrs et el
Sherif

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strength and weakness of gender obedience

A

Giligan
Burger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strength and weakness of situational factors obedience

A

Variation 7
Hofling et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strength of power distance
Obedience

A

Kilham
dolinski

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weakness of individualism and collectivism Obedience

A

Blass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strength and weakness of agency theory

A

Milgrim milgrim counter point of 35% of ppts not obeying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strength and weakness of social impact theory

A

Sedidikes and Jackson
Hofling at el

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strength and weakness of realistic conflict theory

A

Sherif and tajfel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strength and weakness of social identity theory

A

Tajfel and Wetherel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strength and weakness of milgrim

A

Burger
Low Mundane realism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strength and weakness of sherif

A

High mundane realism
Tyerman and spencer or low populational validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strength and weakness of burger

A

High internal validity
Low mundane realism

17
Q

Strengh and weakness of milgrim variation 7 10 13

A

High control
All conditions kept the same as original study =prods given shock machine
Only difference (immediacy etc)
Shows cause effect relationship between less obedient to less immediacy or streng of individual or legitimacy of environment
low Mundane realism

18
Q

Strength and weakness for collectivism and individualism
Power distance obedience

A

Kilham dolinski
Blass

19
Q

Strength and weakness for collectivism and individualism
Power distance obedience ( ex)

A

Kilham- low power distance Australia- 28% obedience

Dolinki-high power distance dolinki - 90%obedience
Power distance does have an impact on obedience

Blass- 65.94 % obedience across other countries
60.94% obedience in us replications
Suggesting that obedience is universal and cultural factors doesn’t effect it

20
Q

Strength and weakness of personality - authoritian( obedience)

A

Elms and milgrim- 20 fully obedient milgrim ppts vs 20 disobedient ppts

Obedient ppts scored higher authoritarian personality on f scale personality does have impact on obedience

However cannot fully claim that it’s due to authoritian persona that is the cause of obedience may also be factors like lower education

21
Q

Strength and weakness of personality- locus of control - obedience

A

Oliner oliner - found 406 rescuers who resisted orders > more likely to have higher locus of control than 126 ppl who obeyed

Loc can influence obedience

Schurz - Austrian ppts ordered to give painful ultrasound sound the female students
- ppts that obeyed or disobeyed didn’t significantly differ in terms of there scores on questionnaire measuring Loc

Loc may not have impact

22
Q

Strength and weakness of gender obedience

A

Giligan- men care more about justice
Women care more about avoiding harm to other
Suggest : women - less obedient in harming others

Burger found that in both men and women 70% of ppts continued after 150v
Suggest: no difference in obedience in men and women

23
Q

Strength and weakness of situational factors (obedience)

A

For proximity
Milgrim variation 7 - found that when the research left the room and gave orders via telephone obedience dropped to 22.5 %

Weakness hofling
When nurses were given orders to give an overdose of medicine to a patient from the doctor via telephone 21/ 22 obeyed

24
Q

Strength and weakness of social norms ( prejudice)

A

Filindra
Increase in presence of immigrants correlated harsher immigration policy
Prejudice increase due = economic hardship and competition for jobs and resources justifying prejudice due to perceived threat to social norms

Wetheral- 8 Yr old indigenous Polynesian students in new Zealand where more generous with point allocation than Caucasian peers
Suggest: prejudice is ethnocentric

25
Strength and weakness for culture ( prejudice)
Wetheral- 8 Yr old Polynesian students in new Zealand where more generous with point allocation than Caucasian peers Suggest: culture may be a bigger factor for less prejudice Sherif - found that due to intergroup competition between boys games like tug of war led to prejudice which was show in the boys " your not eagles ur pigeons "prejudice due to competition
26
Strength and weakness for personality ( prejudice)
Cohrs et al Germany ( able bodied heterosexual and German national) completed questionnaire on prejudice and RWA on how they feel towards homos foreign disables = more RWA = more prejudice you are Sherif - found that due to intergroup competition between boys games like tug of war led to prejudice which was show in the boys " your not eagles ur pigeons "prejudice due to competition
27
Strength and weakness of agency theory
Migrim Found that 65% ppt pressed the 450v shock button when ordered to by an authority figure Migrim counter point There was a 35% of ppl that disobeyed to press 450v when an order by authority figure agency so it doesn't explain individual differences in ppl
28
Strength of social impact theory
Sedikies and Jackson Zoo > order to stop leaning on the barrier More people followed the order when there was a man in uniform than without uniform ( strength) Large groups of ppl > less likely for ppl to obey After zoo keeper left ppl stopped obeying (proximity) which suggest that social impact theory does explain obedience
29
Weakness of social impact theory
Hofling at el Found that when a doctor told nurses to administer the wrong dosage of medicine to the patients over the phone 21 out of 22 obeyed which suggest that social impact theory might be wrong as the doctor had very low immediacy but the nurses still obeyed
30
Strength of realistic conflict theory
Sherif Found that when boys that were assigned to random group competed against each other in games like Tug of war there was in crease in prejudice they began to burn each others flags and call each other pigeons Suggest that prejudice does increase due to competition
31
Weakness of realistic conflict theory
Tajfel Found that in a group of boys randomly allocated When doing a point allocation task the groups always chose to maximise point differ with the other group Showing that's perhaps the existence of groups leads to prejudice
32
Strength of social identity theory
Tajfel Found that in a group of boys randomly allocated When doing a point allocation task the groups always chose to maximise point differ with the other group Showing that's perhaps the existence of groups leads to prejudice
33
Weakness of social identity theory
Wetheral Found that in 8 years old indigenous Polynesian students in new Zealand that there were more generous with their point allocation task than their Caucasian peers so perhaps it's ethnodcentric
34
Strength of burger
High internal validity As people that found the study distressing and people that had done any psychology class in college were screened out to ensure that which controlled any extraneous variables
35
Weakness of burger
Low mundane realism As the consequences for getting a word pair wrong as getting a shock is too intense and not realistic example If a student forget to do their homework they wouldn’t get shocked showing how the study may not apply to real life situations
36
Strength of sherif
High mundane realism The boys competed in activity such as tug of war and baseball which is reflective as real 12 old boys complete in such games Therefore increase in prejudice due to competition would help us under prejudice in social conflicts
37
Weakness of sherif
High populational validity Ppts were 12 Yr old Yt middle class protestant boys from USA Finding on prejudice due to competition may apply to adults,other cultures like China or women- maybe unique to their social group