1. Social influence Flashcards
Who proposed that there are three types of conformity?
Kelman 1958
What are the 3 types of conformity that Kelman proposed?
- Internalisation
- Compliance
- Identification
What motivates conformity?
Fitting in
What is social comparison?
Concentration on what others say or do so that they can adjust their own actions to fit in with them (part of compliance)
Why do people engage in social comparison?
When they’re exposed to the views or actions of the majority - to fit in
What effect does Compliance have on a person’s attitude?
It does not result in any change in the person’s underlying attitude, only their views and behaviors they express in public
What is a validation process in Internalisation?
Examining their own beliefs to see if they or the others are right
What effect does Internalisation have on a person’s attitude?
It can lead to acceptance of the group’s POV both publicly and privately
When does Internalisation usually happen?
When the group is generally trustworthy in their views and the individual has tended to go along with them on previous occasions
Why do people conform via identification?
It makes them feel more part of a group by adopting their attitudes and behaviours
Why is Identification like Internalisation AND Compliance?
Internalisation –> the individual accepts the attitudes and behaviours they are adopting as right and true
Compliance –> The purpose of adopting them is to become an accepted member of the group
Give an example of identification
A child may start smoking as they think they are seen as cool
What are the two explanations for conformity?
- Normative social influence
- Informational social influence
What is normative social influence?
Going along with the majority without really accepting their POV
What is normative social influence usually referred to?
Compliance
Humans are a social species - what does this mean in relation to normative social influence?
They have a fundamental need for social companionship and a fear of censure and rejection
What forms the basis for normative social influence?
The fact that humans are a social species - to gain acceptance etc
What is an important condition for normative social influence?
They must be under surveillance by the group
What does normative social influence mean for the the person’s attitude?
- They tend to conform to the majority position in public
- They don’t necessarily internalise this view as it doesn’t carry over into private settings nor does it endure over time
(Nail 1986)
What is informational social influence?
Occurs when an individual accepts info from others as evidence about reality
What forms the basis for informational social influence?
Humans have a need to be accepted, however humans need to feel confident that their perceptions and beliefs are correct - they may rely on the opinions of others for this
When is informational social influence more likely?
If the situation is more ambiguous or where others are experts
In informational social influence how does the person adapt to the group?
The individual does not comply in behaviour alone but also changes their behaviour in line with the group position
What does informational social influence mean for the person’s attitude?
It involves changing both public and private attitudes and behaviors
Because people’s public and private attitudes and behaviours change in informational social influence, what is it a form of?
Internaliastion
What did Asch’s study involve?
- Asch asked student volunteers to take part in a visual discrimination task
- The volunteers didn’t know all but one participants were confederates
- Real aim was to see the effects of social influence
When was Asch’s study?
1956
Who was studied in Asch’s study?
123 male US undergraduates were studied
How was Asch’s study set up?
- Participants were seated around a table and asked to look at three lines of different lengths
- They took turns is calling out which line they thought was the same length as the ‘standard’ line
- The real participant always answered second last
How did Asch manipulate his study to test the effects of social influence?
There was a fairly obvious solution - the confederates were asked to answer wrong on 12 of the 18 trials
What was Asch interested in, in his study?
Whether the ‘real’ participants would stick to what they believed to be right, or cave into the pressure of the majority and go along with its decision
How many critical trials were done in Asch’s study?
12
What was the average rate of conformity in Asch’s study?
33% - participants agreed with the incorrect response given by the other group members
What individual differences did Asch notice with conformity rates?
- 1/4 of participants never conformed to any of the critical trials
- Half conformed on 6+ of the critical trials
- 1 in 20 of the participants conformed on all 12 of the critical trials
How did Asch confirm that the stimulus lines were indeed unambiguous?
He conducted a control condition - it did not have the distraction of confederates giving wrong answers
What did Asch find in the control condition?
Participants made mistakes about 1% of the time
What did the results of the control condition show?
It could not explain the relatively high levels of conformity in the main study
When Asch interviewed his participants after the study, what did he discover?
The majority of the participants who conformed had continued privately to trust their own perceptions - but changed their public behaviours
Why did the participants change their opinions in Asch’s study form what they believed?
They gave incorrect answers to avoid disapproval from the other group members
What were the 3 variables affecting conformity in Asch’s study?
- Group size
- Unanimity of the majority
- Difficulty
Why did Asch use the variables in his study?
To find out which variables had the most significant effects on the level of conformity shown by participants
When did Asch find that conformity was low due to group size?
When the majority consisted of just 1 of 2 confederates
When did Asch find that conformity was high due to group size?
When the majority consisted of 3 confederates
When the majority was 3 confederates, how did this affect the conformity in Asch’s study?
Conformity jumped to 30%
If the group size was increased over 3 confederates, what did Asch find happened to conformity?
Further increase in the size of the majority did not increase the level of conformity substantially
This indicated that the size of the majority was important but only up to a point
What did Campbell and Fairey (1989) suggest about group size, relating to Asch’s study?
They suggested that group size may have a different effect depending on the type of judgement being made & the motivation of the individual
When might a person be likely to be persuaded by the majority?
Where there is no objectively correct answer & the individual is concerned about ‘fitting in’ - the larger the majority the more likely they’re to be swayed
When may a person not be swayed by the majority?
When there is a correct answer & the individual is concerned about being correct
The views of just one or two others will be sufficient
What happened to conformity in Asch’s study when the unanimity of the majority was disturbed?
When ppt was given support of one person with correct answers conformity levels droppped:
From 33% wrong answers to 5.5%
When confederate gave answer different to majority but wrong conformity dropped to 9%