1. DRIs Flashcards
DRIs:
- before, Canada VS US? (name of things + date)
- who also publishes stuff?
- since when are they both together? name? why?
BEFORE:
- Canada: Recommended Nutrient Intakes (RNIs) since 1938
- US: Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) since 1941
- FAO/WHO/UNU published Safe level of Intake in 1985
SINCE 1997:
- Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs)
- because increase trade btw Canada and US + similar population
what are the 7 panels that the (what?) committee on (what?) reviews?
- what are the 2 subcommittees?
Standing Committee on Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes
1. Ca, Vit D, P, Mg, F
2. Folate, B12, B vitamins, Choline
3. Antioxidants and related nutrients
4. trace elements
5. electrolytes
6. Energy and macronutrients
7. other food components
- Upper reference levels subcommittee –> monitors supplement use and fortification
- uses of DRIs subcommittee –> how can DRIs be used to assess population + communication
EAR vs RDA vs AI vs UL
vs what did we have before?
EAR:
- estimated average requirement (from which RDA is determined) –> meets needs of 50% of pop
RDA:
- recommended dietary allowance (which replaces the formed RDA and RNI) –> RDA = EAR + 2 SD –> 97.5% of pop
AI:
- adequate intake (alternative reference when EAR and consequently RDA are not available)
- approximation of safe level of intake bc not enough info to come up with RDA –> based on population intake
- not equivalent to RDA
UL:
- tolerable upper intake level: max level before toxicity risks –> intake below UL are unlikely to pose risks of adverse effects in healthy people
- usually much higher than RDA (depends on fat or water soluble though)
- before: all were considered RDAs even if no rigorous proof
- RDAs are a ________ _______ only in evaluating diets of _________
- when assessing diet, below which percentage of RDA shows that there might be risk of nutrient deficiency?
- as intake decreases from RDA (from +1SD to mean to -1SD to -2SD) –> probably of deficiency increases/decreases?
- reference point only in evaluating diets of individual!
- < 66% of RDA –> need to do more testing to check if risk of deficiency
- increases! if less than -2SD of intake –> 100% risk of deficiency
RDA:
- amounts of selected nutrients considered adequate to meet the known nutrient needs of nearly all _________ individuals
- determined by _____________ in a __________ population
- based upon estimation of a minimal/maximal (?) requirement to achieve some _______ outcome
recommended dietary allowance
- all healthy individuals –> should NOT include obese people or ppl with diseases
- determined by experimentation in a healthy population
- minimal requirement to achieve some measurable outcome –> a clear biochemical index!!!
what are 3 valid studies that are considered when making RDAs?
- deficiency states
- balance studies (adequate intake has to match losses/amount excreted)
- animal research –> gives you idea of biochemical markers
RDA must account for (4) + explain
- INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN A POPULATION
- coefficient of variability of population –> gaussian distribution can be flattened or very thin –> both could have same mean/EAR but RDA will be different! - BIOAVAILABILITY
- key concept!
- need to check average population diet (ie 1/3 animal and 2/3 plant protein)
- might meet RDA through diet but if all from plants = less bioavailable - SEX AND AGE DIFFERENCES
- sex: not so much in early stages in life –> more when puberty hits - PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE
- ie for pregnancy and lactation –> consider adult values + factors to accommodate for baby growth/nutrient losses through lactation
EAR
- what?
- suitable for individuals or groups?
- based on what?
- usual intake level that is estimated to meet the requirement of half the healthy individuals in a life stage and gender group
- suitable method to assess prevalence of inadequate intakes for GROUPS
- based on intake DISTRIBUTION of group and not the average intake of group
how to calculate RDA?
1. if SD of EAR is available
2. if SD of EAR not available
- RDA = EAR + 2SD
- assume of coefficient of variability of 10%
- CV = SD/EAR –> SD = CV* EAR
- RDA = EAR + 2SD
- RDA = EAR + 2(CV* EAR)
- RDA = EAR(1 + 2* 0.1)
- RDA = 1.2* EAR
how to calculate RDA for energy/calories?
you DONT calculate by using EAR + 2SD because that will definitely lead to weight gain
- humans have inherent self-regulation where you eat depending on physical activity/hunger
RDAs:
- intended to be met through _____ containing variety of ______
- to be achieved via ______ _______ intakes over a period of _______ –> explain
- goal = prevent (3 ish)
- not designed to (2)
- through diets containing variety of foods
- via average daily intakes over a period of days –> you dont need to reach RDA every single day bc you have body stores! –> RDAs take into account body pools
- goals = prevent deficiency (promote health) + prevent chronic diseases (new part of RDA development!)
*ie carotenoids can prevent eye cataract but need more than the RDA to prevent vit A deficiency - not designed to overcome nutrient deficiencies (will need much more than RDA) OR to recover from illness/post-operation
why is comparing the mean intake of a group with the EAR not a good approach?
- because the bell curve can have difference coefficient of variability (ie different flatness/narrowness)
- 2 groups can both have a mean intake above the RDA, but if group A’s bell curve is more flat, a bigger part of that group will have an intake below the EAR
*see schéma slide 22
how to estimate the target mean intakes using EAR values?
- one curve for requirement distribution where mean = EAR
- another curve for intake distribution where, depending on the coefficient of variability, you want only 2.5% of the distribution/curve to be to the left of EAR from first curve
*The EAR is used to determine the mean intake levels for population!
*see schéma slide 23
How do DRIs differ conceptually from the former RDAs and RNIs? (4)
- where possible (bc sometimes not enough proof), reduction in risk of chronic degenerative disease is included in formulation of recommendation
- concepts of probability and risk explicitly underpin the determination of the DRIs and applications (ie <66% RDA = high risk of deficiency)
- upper levels of intake are established (different for children and adults and pregnant mother though)
- food components that may not meet the traditional concept of a nutrient are considered (but not necessarily implemented in recs bc of lack of evidence
what are examples of “other food components”? 9 ish
+ define
- polyphenols, carotenoids, non pro vit-A carotenoids like lutein and zeaxanthin, isoflavones, tannins, anthocyanates, catechins, probiotics, prebiotics
- “lifestyle” vitamins where a deficiency won’t cause disfunction but having it gives improved function in lifespan + decrease diseases