YR2 BELIEFS: theories of religion Flashcards
What are the 3 sociological definitions of religion CALLED?
- the functional definition
- the substantive definition
- the social constructionist definition
how does the functional definition define religion?
functionalists like Durkheim & Parsons say that religion is defined by the social and psychological functions it performs for society. For example religion gives us comfort, a sense of community etc.
how does the substantive definition define religion? And give an example of a sociologist with this view
religion is the belief in a supernatural power that is unable to be scientifically explained. Max Weber said religion requires a belief in a supernatural deity in 1905
how does the social constructionist definition define religion?
diversity of religious belief means there is not one definitive definition of what religion is. It is personal to every individual. Aldridge uses this to question if scientology regarded as a religion.
What do functionalists believe is society’s most basic need, and what concept makes it possible? (theories of religion)
society’s most basic need = the need for social order and solidarity.
- made possible by value consensus : a set of shared norms/values by which society’s members live by.
do functionalists generally view religion as good or bad for society?
Functionalists believe religion is good for society as it generates an agreed set of values, which then operates to hold society together.
When a group shares the same values, and thus generates a collective conscience, what does this PREVENT? which functionalists particularly appreciate.
it prevents SOCIAL CHANGE
What 2 concepts does functionalist Durkheim distinguish between in relation to religion?
the sacred (things that are significant and inspire awe/wonder) and the profane (things with no special significance). Durkheim argues all religions have something that is regarded as sacred.
name at least 2 key functionalists’ studies on the role of religion in society
-Durkheim’s 1915 study into the Arunta Clan
-Malinowski’s 1954 study into the Trobriand Islanders
-Parson’s 1967 study into values and meanings
-Bellah’s 1991 + 2013 study into civil religions
Who were the Arunta Clan whom Durkheim studied in 1915? What did they do?
-aboriginal Australian tribe
-worship a sacred totem pole
-totem pole includes emblems that depict the clan’s origins and identity
-they come together to perform rituals around the totem pole
What did Durkheim take away from his study of the Arunta clan regarding the role of religion in society?
-when the clan come together to perform rituals around the totem pole, it creates social solidarity and a sense of belonging
-suggested when they worship the pole, they are actually worshipping society
-this gives the group power, creates a collective conscience + social integration.
what conclusion does Durkheim come to about the role of religion in society from his study of the Arunta Clan?
that religion performs SOCIAL FUNCTIONS for society. (social solidarity, collective conscience)
Give 1 criticism of Durkheim’s study into the Arunta Clan
-unrepresentative: small scale study of one group which cannot be generalised
-1915 (OUT OF DATE) doesn’t apply to contemporary multi-faith society
summarise who/what Malinowski studied in his study of the Trobriand Islanders. (without yet linking it to religion)
-the Trobriand Islanders of the Western Pacific fish in the lagoon and the ocean for food.
-fishing in the lagoon is safe. fishing in the ocean is dangerous, uncontrollable and unpredictable.
-islanders performed rituals (canoe magic) together before fishing in the ocean which acted to provide comfort, ensuring a safe & successful trip.
What did Malinowski take away from his study of the Trobriand Islanders regarding the role of religion in society?
religion provides comfort in times of crisis, like death and puberty, and helps people cope with emotional stress that could threaten social solidarity. also suggests that death is the main reason for religion.
what conclusion does Malinowski come to about the role of religion in society from his study of the Trobriand Islanders?
religion performs psychological functions for individuals in society
Give 1 criticism of Malinowski’s 1954 study of the Trobriand Islanders
-unrepresentative: small scale study of one group which cannot be generalised
-1954 (OUT OF DATE) do other things, like family, provide more comfort than religion?
summarise functionalist Parson’s study of religion in the Western world regarding the role of religion in society
-looked at how religion functions in the western world
-argues religion helps us to cope with unforeseen events / uncontrollable outcomes
-religion creates + legitimates society’s values and is the primary source of meaning/explanation in society
-religion puts society’s norms/values in a sacred context, giving them more importance and meaning
-religion provides answers to life’s ultimate questions (eg life and death)
What conclusion does Parsons come to in his study of religion in the Western world regarding the role of religion in society?
Religion performs both social AND psychological functions for society
Give 1 criticism of Parsons’ 1967 study into values and meanings
-1967 (OUT OF DATE)
-we are now multi faith and have different belief systems all providing different explanations + meanings
-do other sources (science) now provide answers to life’s ultimate questions?
Summarise Bellah’s 2013 study into civil religions regarding the role of religion in society
-studied contemporary multi faith society, focusing on America
-argued we now have ‘civil religions’, often in the form of patriotism
-America has a huge faith in Americanism, which integrates individuals in a way traditional religions can’t. (national anthem, pledge of allegiance to flag)
-argued that civil religions unify society
What does Bellah conclude from his 2013 study of civil religions?
civil religion performs social functions for society
Give 1 criticism of Bellah’s 2013 study into civil religions
-can this be applied to other societies? Would it work in Britain? Does Britain have the same sense of patriotism?
What did Karl Marx predict would inevitably happen in the future regarding the working class and capitalism?
The working class will ultimately become conscious of their exploitation and unite to overthrow capitalism. This would create a classless society with no exploitation