Wrong and Correct Flashcards
[wrong] in delivery, the word “intent of present transfer”, what it should be translated to korean?
In the context of delivery, how should the term ‘intent of present transfer’ be translated into Korean?
How do I translate ‘intent of present transfer’ into Korean when talking about delivery?
[wrong] how the term ‘relinquish’ is to be translated into korean?
How should the term ‘relinquish’ be translated into Korean?
- The original sentence, “how the term ‘relinquish’ is to be translated into korean?”, lacks the auxiliary verb “should” before the subject. Proper structure would be “How should the term ‘relinquish’ be translated into Korean?”.
- In the original sentence, “how the term ‘relinquish’ is to be translated”, the word order is incorrect for a question. The corrected version “How should the term ‘relinquish’ be translated?” places the auxiliary verb “should” before the subject, which is the expected word order in English questions.
[wrong] Before I decide where to go, I decided what law school to go and a friend said to me Irvine is the best place for Koreans to live.
When I was deciding where to live or settle in the US, I was also in the process of selecting a law school to attend.
Then, a friend advised me that Irvine is the ideal place for Koreans to live.
Mohona’s Comment: By adding these more complex words, you can increase the specificity in your sentence and make your argument in more detail.
[wrong] When it comes to the specialized area, the labor law, I am very interested in the labor law area and in America (also in Korea) many applicants are not interested in labor law itself.
Regarding my specialty, labor law, I feel that my interest in the subject distinguishes me from other American and Korean law students or applicants. In my view or perspective, most or many applicants are not particularly interested or drawn to labor law.
Mohona’s Comment: By using these expressions, you can not only add more detail to your sentence, but point to more specific examples to make your argument.
[wrong] I have this principle that no applications should overlap. So my application should be unique. So I have to make a question again and again if the other person can use this sentence in their application.
I maintain the principle that none of my applications should overlap or be overlapping.
Therefore, I also emphasize uniqueness when I am writing my application essays.
To maintain or obtain or achieve this goal, I have to consistently ask myself whether another applicant could potentially use each sentence of mine in their own application essays.
Mohona’s Comment: By using these more complex expressions, you can restructure your sentence to make your points in a more clear and detailed way.
[wrong] My name is Kyunghan Kim from South Korea. My job is lawyer. My major is labor law. I practiced labor law for five years. I live in California.
My name is Kyunghan Kim. I am originally from South Korea, and I work as a lawyer or I practice law. I specialized in labor law for five years. Currently, I am living in California.
[wrong] I remember that how to persuade someone there should be a persuasive ground and the more specific, the more persuasive the ground the more likely someone is to hire me.
I recall that the article describes ways or means of persuading employers by utilizing specific grounds or methods. The more specific or unique these methods, the more persuasive my application will be. With this very persuasive or appealing application, a potential employer would be more likely to or keen to hire me.
[wrong] But labor law is a very crude and a bit not fancy but it rules the fundamental people’s behavior and you have to consider what they want or where they want society to go.
- This is because labor law is not considered to be as glamorous or notable as the other forms of law, such as corporate, antitrust etc. However, I believe or in my opinion, it is crucial to have a thorough understanding of labor laws, as they govern both people’s behavior in the workplace and societal norms.
- Labor laws can be considered to be societal norms, because they regulate not only individual workers and employees, but unions as well. These unions have a societal effect. (These unions also majorly affect society.)
