Working memory capacity & executive attention Flashcards

1
Q

Who created the Working Memory Model?

A

Baddeley (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What components are involved in the WMM?

A
  • visuo-spatial sketchpas
  • episodic buffer
  • phonological loop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of info does the visuo-spatial sketchpad relay into LTM?

A

Visual semantics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of info does the episodic buffer relay into LTM?

A

Episodic LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What type of info does the phonological loop relay into LTM?

A

Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What types of studies provide evidence of separation of the stores?

A
  1. Dual task studies

2. Neuropsychological data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What dual task studies have been conducted?

A

Farmer, Berman & Fletcher (1986) had pps do a verbal task & a spatial reasoning task at the same time –> performance was impaired on one/both (both tasks required the same memory systems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the differences between patients KF, PV & ELD?

A

Patient KF & PV - intact spatial memory & LTM, low digit span

Patient ELD - intact digit span, impaired spatial memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which brain area was damaged in patients KF & PV?

A

They had damage to their verbal memory store –> caused a low digit span

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which brain area was damaged in patient ELD?

A

Damage to their spatial memory store –> caused impaired spatial memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does each slave store require for info to be retained in them?

A

Maintenance and/or rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Engle’s (2001) view on WM span?

A

Our WM span is a score, not a fixed capacity

WM capacity = our capacity of relevant STMs + attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What problems are associated with ‘simple’ span scores?

A

Although digit span is included in the WAIS test, it doesn’t correlate highly with other cognitive abilities –> implies that the ability to recall verbal strings isn’t important

Baddeley (2000) found that ‘loading’ the WM sub-systems doesn’t significantly impair cognitive performance. We perform worse when we are doing 2 spatial/verbal tasks but it doesn’t collapse our ability to do anything else.

Beaman (2007) studied patients KF & PV & found that there were quite cognitively competent in real-world tasks –> implies that something else is going on which allows them to do these tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give examples of WM tests.

A
  1. Reading span task

2. Operation span task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the reading span task predict? What do participants do in the task?

A

Predicts reading comprehension abilities & our performance in the real world

  1. Pps read a sentence with a cue word at the end
  2. Pps make a decision about each sentence - e.g. “is it grammatically correct?”
  3. Eventually pps are asked what the cue words were
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the operation span task?

A

Conceptually similar to the reading span task but no RC is involved

Pps solve simple maths sums & there is a cue word at the end of each sum

17
Q

Voegel, McCollough & Machizawa (2005) compared people with high WM capacity & low WM capacity. What did they find?

A

High WM capacity - better at representing only relevant items in the display

Low WM capacity - inefficiently encode & maintain info about irrelevant items present in the display

18
Q

What skills do simple span tasks?

Processing? Recognition? Recall?

A

Simple span tasks require recall but no other processing

19
Q

What skills do complex span tasks?

Processing? Recognition? Recall?

A

Complex span tasks require processing of other info before recall

20
Q

What is executive attention?

A

Memory representations are maintained in an active state in the presence of interference

We may remember cue words despite doing maths sums as well

21
Q

Differences in complex WM scores reflect differences in EA.

Which researcher/s found this?

A

Kane & Engle (2002)

22
Q

Individual differences in EA reflect differences in the ability to prevent attention focus from being distracted.

Which researcher/s found this?

A

Engle et al. (1999)

23
Q

Individual differences in EA reflect differences in secondary memory search.

Which researcher/s found this?

A

Unsworth & Engle (2007)

24
Q

What did Hasher & Zacks (1988) find regulates WM contents? What does it determine as a result?

A

Inhibitory capacity regulates WM contents & therefore determines WM capacity

25
Q

Individual differences in EA reflect differences in inhibitory capacity.

Which researcher/s found this?

A

Hasher & Zacks (1988)

26
Q

What did Awh & Vogel (2008) find that individual differences in WM reflected?

A

Individual differences in WM reflect differences in efficiency in filtering relevant from irrelevant info

27
Q

According to Awh & Vogel (2008), which area of the brain acts as a filter (to filter relevant info from irrelevant)?

A

The basal ganglia acts as a filter

28
Q

What claims did Engle (2002) make about WM capacity?

A
  • WM capacity is separate from STM
  • WM capacity is a component of fluid intelligence
  • WM capacity represents a domain-free limitation in the ability to control attention
29
Q

When did Engle (2002) claim that WM capacity is important?

A

WM capacity is important when interference leads to retrieval of response tendencies that conflict with the current task

30
Q

In which tasks are individual differences in WM capacity reflected in?

A
  • antisaccade tasks
  • stroop task
  • proactive interference task
  • dichotic listening task
31
Q

What does the antisaccade task predict?

A

Antisaccade tasks predict our eye movements

32
Q

How does WM span affect performance on the Stroop task?

A

Pps with high WM span are less vulnerable to Stroop task interference

33
Q

What does the proactive interference task measure?

A

How much interference you get from something you have already learnt to something you need to remember

34
Q

How does WM span affect the amount of intrusive thoughts a person has?

A

Brewin & Beaton (2002) - people with higher WM spans are less susceptible to intrusive thoughts

35
Q

How does WM span affect performance on dichotic listening tasks?

A

Conway, Cohen & Bunting (2001) - pps with high WM span are less likely to spot their own name on an unattended channel (better able to ignore it)

36
Q

What is the irrelevant sound effect?

A

Irrelevant (unattended) background sounds can impair performance on STM tasks

37
Q

Ellermeier & Zimmer (1997) found that the presence of background noise…

A

…disrupted serial recall & other related tasks

Pps made 30-50% more errors (interferes with WM)

38
Q

Beaman (2004) compared pps with high WM & low WM. Pps did a recall task with irrelevant background noise OR no noise.
What did he find?

A

Pps with high WM recalled more info than pps with low WM

39
Q

In the second phase of Beaman’s (2004) study, pps heard speech that was related OR unrelated to the info that they were trying to remember.
What did he find?

A

Both high WM pps & low WM pps were affected when they heard speech related to the info they were trying to remember

Beaman (2004) thought pps with high WM would be able to resist