wk 3 Flashcards
variance
different performance on our measure(DV)
treatment variance
differences due to what we’ve done (different conditions/treatments)
error variance
differences due to other variables/factors
ceiling effect
the task is too easy
floor effect
the task is too hard
Measurement sensitivity
The ability to detect a change if one occurs
How to fix extraneous variables due to participant characteristics
Randomly assigned participants to groups if it is a between participants design
How do extraneous variables differ from confounding variables
confounding variables differ systematically with aspects of the design and therefore may provide an alternative explanation of whether an affect is found or not
Order effects
changes in behaviour because of ‘when’ a certain condition is completed
Practice effects
participants likely to get better at a task each time they perform it
Fatigue effects
If there are a number of conditions participants may get tired or bored which will affect performance
habituation
Participants may become less sensitive to a stimulus through repetition
Latin square design
this is used when counterbalancing variables when there are multiple conditions. E.g. 4 conditions = 24 orders.
provides a practical compromise to pure counterbalancing and the threat of order effects
Practice trials
these are included to avoid contaminating the first real trials (aka experimental/ test trials)
Randomisation
presents the individual trials in a random order using a computer. this helps to eliminate any systematic bias
demand characteristics
participants may change their behaviour because of task instructions and perceived expectations
pre test
The observation on measured before the intervention
Experimental treatment
the different interventions or conditions
Post test
The observation or measure after the intervention
Maturation effects
participants behaviour changes over time naturally (not due to the treatment/intervention)
History effects
Something changes about the participants circumstances that influences the variables. (e.g. good/bad life events)
Testing Fx
having been tested before which may have changed how they do on the post test
Passive control group
Participants do nothing or a meaningless task while those not in a control group go through the manipulation
active control group
participants do something that they could reasonably assume might have an affect but the researchers assume doesn’t
waitlist
Participants are waiting to take part in the intervention of experimental conditions and they believe that they will at some point
attrition
Participants starting but not completing the study
Differential attrition
When people leave in conditioner treatment more than any other
Random group assignment
This can help to minimise any systematic differences as well as unsystematic. here every participant has an equal chance of being allocated to each group
Matched groups
This is when participants and matched on certain characteristics such as age gender or IQ.