Welfare Issues Flashcards
priority welfare issues in laying hens
- housing
- feather pecking
- beak trimming
- bone health
behavioural restriction in laying hens
- is it important
- what behaviours are we worried about?
- Nesting
- Perching
- Dust bathing
- Foraging
> most contentious of welfare issues, driven the change in housing systems
importance of nesting to laying hens
- Every time a hen lays an egg, it is preceded by searching, nest building and sitting on the nest
- Most hens prefer to lay in a nest box
- hens will perform a variety of ‘costly; tasks to get the nest box
importance of perching for hens
- Hens perch in high places to avoid predators
- Hens prefer to rest on perches
- Hens may ‘work’ for access to perch
- It is well established that perching increases bone strength
importance of dustbathing to hens
- on litter hens dust bathe every 2-3 days
- hens sham dust bathe on wire floors
- after deprivation hens dustbathe more quickly and for a longer period of time suggesting internal build-up of motivation
- dont ‘work’ very hard for a dustbath
- pleasurable?
importance of foraging to a hen
- foraging behaviour dominates the time budget
- hens contrafreeload
- providing
- providing foraging substrate reduces the risk of feather pecking
Cages
* Conventional cages
* Furnished cages/Enriched colonies
> Small - up to ~15 hens
> Medium - 15-30 hens
> Large - 30 hens up to ~ 60
<><><><>
Non-cage systems
- single-tiers non-cage banrs
- multitiered (aviaries)
- outdoor and free range
pros and cons of conventional cages for layers
- promote good health and hygiene
- but space and behaviour are greatly restricted
- and lack of exercise leads to weaker bones
furnished cages pros and cons
- include nest box, perches, litter area for scratching and dustbathing or more modern scratch mat
<><><>
Requirements – Floor space – Nest space – Perches
– Scratch mat
<><><><><> - Provide health benefits of the hygiene and
conventional cages - perches and more space increase bone strength
- furnishings support some of the behaviour patterns shown to be important to hens
non-cage systems requirements, pros and cons
Requirements – Floor space – Nest space – Perches
– Litter
<><><><>
- Perch design also affects risk for injuries
- Litter in non-cage systems is mainly dried manure, which hens really like…
- But these areas become crowded - risk of piling
- Litter also leads to poor air quality and hygiene
non-cage and outdoor systems pros and cons
- Provide more space and opportunities to engage in a full range of behavior
- But increased risk of poor hygiene, disease and broken bones from flying accidents
- And problems such emaciation, feather
pecking and piling/smothering
<><><> - free range systems have highest mortality (second is free range aviary, then barn, then aviary…)
how have housing system mortlaities changed over time
conventional cages have been basically the same for a while, while furnished cages, multi-tier aviareis, and single tier aviaries have way less mortality these days than in previous years
Rearing Systems for Growing Pullets
- Hens housed in complex aviaries must be reared in complex environments
- Rearing in aviaries enhances spatial cognition, improves 3-D use of space and reduces fearfulness
- Rearing in aviaries affects bone and muscle development
Injurious Pecking in Laying Hens - types
- feather pecking: gentle (eploratory, stereotypes, or directed at particles) vs severe (removal of feathers)
- tissue pecking: mostly directed at toes or vent
- aggressive pecking: mostly directed at head and neck
Feather Pecking in laying hens
- what housing system? age?
- consequences?
- Occurs in all types of housing systems
- Large variation between and within flocks
- Increases with age – can start in the rearing flock
- Causes feather damage
- Consequences:
– Economic–reducedefficiency > More food or more heat
– Welfare – pain and discomfort
– Public perception