Weeks 11-13 Flashcards

1
Q

Contact Hypothesis

A

Increase awareness of similarities

Challenge out group homogeneity view

Put members of different groups in contact with each other so they may recognize similarities with each other.

Research involving sending 22 boys to camp and establishing a rivalry between the camps found that mixing the groups together was not enough. Boys were better able to see past their differences when they were forced to work together toward a shared goal.

Cooperative activities are effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Out group homogeneity

A

A notion where my group has a lot of variety within it but members of other groups are very similar to each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conformity

A

When a person changes their attitudes or behaviours so they are consistent with those of other people around them in a social situation. This is not requested of us.

Informational social influence: we want to be right

Normative social influence: we want to fit in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Compliance

A

A change in behaviour as explicitly requested by another person or group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Principles of Compliance

A

Friendship/liking: we help our friends

Scarcity: if we think our freedom to make that choice will soon be restricted we are more likely to make that choice. (cookie jar experiment)

Reciprocity: return the favour. (experiment where confederates left for the bathroom and came back with a pop for their partner)

Authority: very convincing. (nurse experiment wherein nurses went over maximum dosage for fake doctor)

Commitment/consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Compliance techniques: Foot-in-the-door technique

A

Ask for something small and when they say yes ask for something bigger.

Experiment wherein people were asked to put safe driver cards in their windows and then billboards on their lawns. People were more likely to say yes if they had previously agreed to the card in the window.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Compliance techniques: lowball technique

A

Obtain the commitment and then raise the cost of the commitment.

Experiment wherein if people knew the meeting was at 7 am on a saturday they would say no. But if they had already committed then not only would they stick to their commitment verbally, but they also showed up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Compliance techniques: door-in-the-face technique

A

Begin by asking for a huge and outrageous request, when refused ask for something smaller.

Undergrads were asked if they would commit to 2 hours every week for 2 years for a volunteer thing. After they refused, they were twice as likely to commit to 2 hours this week if the previous request had been made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Obedience

A

Compliance with the orders of another person or group

Stanley Milgram post world war II experiment

Experiment with teacher and “learner” found that despite showing signs of extreme stress people will often go with authority’s agenda. Teacher “shocked” learner even when health concerns were made apparent.

Issues around ethics as many participants were traumatized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is proximity a predictor of attraction?

A

We are more likely to be attracted to people who are closer to us geographically, this is because we find familiarity attractive.

Research around first year friendships on a university residence. People who lived closer to each other were also closer friends.

Frequent exposure to a person makes us feel more positively about them: experiment where researchers showed up to different number of lectures, those who showed up to more lectures were rated at a higher level of attractiveness indicating that frequent exposure increase likelihood of attraction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Functional Distance

A

Opportunities to bump into each other

Short functional distance: lots of opportunities to run into each other
-like being in the same psych lecture mon/wed/fri as someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Physical Attractiveness as a predictor of attraction

A

Experiment where participants had to go to a dance and were partnered off. The only significant predictor of wanting to see someone again was objective attractiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attractive Features

A

Symmetrical faces: because they indicate “typicality” of sex.

More average faces are rated as attractive (familiarity)

Women:

  • waists 1/3 narrower than hips
  • large eyes, prominent cheekbones, small nose, wide small

Men:

  • v shaped physique
  • broad jaws, chiseled features
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2 general arguments for why we value physical attractiveness

A
  1. halo effect: one positive trait must mean that they have other positive traits
  2. evolutionary reproductive strategies: assumes reproductive goals, this neglects the queer community though
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does reciprocity impact attraction?

A

We like people who like us, we like positive feedback.

Self-enhancement.

Experiment found that participants were told their person liked them both participants would like each other more. Behaviours changed because they believed they were liked and vice versa for when they were told they were not liked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why does similarity matter in regards to attraction?

A

Research finds that married hetero couples were happier when they were more similar to each other, particularly in regards to politics and religion. They read situations in a similar way.

Age, education level, religion, and political views are all factors.

17
Q

Relationship Maintenance Strategies

A
Positivity
Openness
Assurances
Social Networking
Task Sharing
Joint Activities
Mediated Communication
Respect Privacy 
No Antisocial Behaviour
Humour
18
Q

Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love

A

Love has 3 components that make up Consummate Love:

  1. Intimacy or emotional closeness
  2. Commitment to relationship
  3. Passion or arousal
19
Q

Liking

A

Intimacy component of love

Defines most friendships

20
Q

Companionate Love

A

Intimacy and Commitment are present but there is a lack of passion

Like a best friend

21
Q

Empty Love

A

Commitment is there but there is no intimacy or passion.

Like an arranged marriage

22
Q

Fatuous Love

A

Passion and commitment are there but no intimacy

Whirlwind romance

23
Q

Infatuation

A

Only passion

One night stand

24
Q

Romantic Love

A

Passion and intimacy but no commitment

Friends with benefits

25
Q

Attachment

A

A strong emotional tie a person feels toward special people in their lives.

26
Q

__________ exist between infant attachment and romantic attachment.

A

Commonalities exist between infant attachment and romantic attachment.

27
Q

Ainsworth’s Strange Situation

A

In 3 minute chunks, infant is 6-9 months, an age where separation anxiety occurs.

Parent and child are alone in a room

Child explores the room without parental interaction, maybe checks out the toys

Stranger enters, talks to parent, approaches child

Parent leaves

Parent returns and comforts child.

28
Q

Secure Childhood Attachment

A
  • explores comfortably
  • distressed when mom leaves
  • quickly calms when mom returns
29
Q

Secure Adult Attachment

A
  • comfortable in trusting partner

- able to seek support from partner

30
Q

Avoidant Childhood Attachment

A
  • explores comfortably
  • no distress when parent leaves
  • does not seek out mom when she returns
31
Q

Dismissing Adult Attachment

A
  • compulsively self reliant
  • uncomfortable with getting close to others
  • emotionally distant
  • predicts shorter relationship
32
Q

Anxious/Ambivalent Childhood Attachment

A
  • does not venture from mom to explore
  • very distressed by mom leaving
  • stranger does not help
  • does not calm down when mom returns, in fact punishes mom with biting and pulling her hair
  • often can’t make the three minutes of mom being gone
33
Q

Preoccupied Adult Attachment

A
  • overly focused on relationships
  • fear of abandonment
  • very pushy for closeness, jealous
  • intermittently rejecting partner
  • negative, predicts shorter relationship
34
Q

Insecure attachment styles

A

Childhood:

  • Avoidant
  • Anxious/Ambivalent

Adult:

  • Dismissing
  • Preoccupied
35
Q

Behavioural Couple Therapy

A

Focus on behaviour of expressing emotions

Communication Training

Behaviour Exchange: informal contract increases likelihood of couples engaging in needed behaviour

Cognitive restructuring: re-evaluating how we think about things, avoiding big, over arching, and inaccurate statements.

Emotional expressiveness training

36
Q

Emotion Focused Couples Counselling

A

Inner emotional experience

Focus on attachment styles, reflect on what client believes to be their attachment style to be

Understanding complexity of emotions

Paying attention to when you are feeling a particular way and why.

37
Q

Primary vs Secondary emotions

A

Primary:

  • simplistic and broad
  • fear and sadness

Secondary:

  • involve multiple primary elements
  • underneath primary
  • disappointment and frustration
38
Q

Abusive Relationships

A

Physical, emotional, verbal

All genders are just as likely to be abusive however male identifying victims are less likely to report abuse

Resistance to reporting in same sex relationships

39
Q

Attraction and relationship formation is often the function of

A

Proximity
Physical attraction
Reciprocity
Similarity