Week 9.3 and 10.1 Attention Flashcards

1
Q

what is attention

A

focalization, concentration of consciousness
withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

6 varieties of attention

A

external - attend to stimuli in world
internal - attend to one line of thought
overt - direct a sense organ to a stimulus
covert - attend without giving outward sign
divided - splitting between two stim
sustained - continuously monitoring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

visual attention

A

selection of visual stim for further visual + cog analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

moving visual attention - splotlight model (posner 1980)

A

attention = like spotlight which moves + selectively attends to parts of visual word
- areas within spotlight = extra processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

orienting attention - posner, davidson and snyder (1980)

A
  • examined covert shifts of attention
  • the effect of visually pre-cueing regions of space on detecting presence of potential target
  • if shift of attention in space improved processing of stimulus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

theories of attention - zoom lens (eriksen and yeh, 1985)

A

attended region can grow/shrink depending on size of area to be processed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

visual search - feature search

A

target defined by presence of single feature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

visual search - conjunction search

A

target defined by co-occurence of two or more features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

spatial configuration search

A

target + distractions contain same basic features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

efficiency of visual search

A

efficiency = vg increase in RT for each item added
measured in search slope or ms/item
larger slope = less efficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

binding problem

A

challenge of tying diff attributes of visual stim (handled by diff brain circuits) to appropriate object –> perceive unified object

colour+motion+orientation = separate neurons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

treisman’s theory of visual attention

A

a limited set of basic features can be processed in parallel preattentively
other properties (i.e. binding of features to objects) require attention
preattentive stage: processing of stim that occurs before selective attention is deployed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

illusory conjunction

A

erroneous combination of two features in a visual scene
provide evidence that some features = represented independently + need to be correctly bound with attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

problem for spotlight theory

A

attention appears to be object not location based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

yarbus (1967) experiment proved

A

human eyes fixate on visual elements that carry essential/useful info
more info contained = longer eyes stay on it
distribution of fixation on elements of a scene = depends on purpose of observer
thinking affects seeing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

real-world visual search

A

real-world guides visual search
scene-based guidance: info in our understanding of scenes helps find specific objects

17
Q

cognitive ethology kingstone et al 2008

A

cog ethology advocates studying behaviour under realistic conditions

18
Q

two incorrect assumptions in lab-based studies

A

i) the processes that help cognition are regular across conditions
ii) situational variability can be reduced without affecting the nature of the process being measured

19
Q

lab restrictions

A

2d
limited res
size of display
unnatural responses
constrained head movement

20
Q

savelsbergh et al 2005

A

gaze behaviour of goalkeepers during video sim of penalty kick
- they incorrectly assumed the behaviours observed during sim were consistent + represented real-world behaviour

21
Q

dicks et al 2010

A

replicated savelsbergh et al 2005 study
- with inclusion of real-world condition
observed similar behaviour in sim condition as savelsbergh
- simulated condition - high percent of fixation toward legs of penalty taker
- real world - goalkeepers fixated almost exclusively on the ball