Week 8- Interventions wrap up, Psychological Influences on Covid 19 Susceptibility Flashcards

1
Q

Types of intervention to change health behaviours?

A

-Education models to inform
-Social-cognitive models to change beliefs & attitudes
-Stages of change model (Transtheoretical model)
-Rothman et al. (2015) principles
-Behaviour Change Wheel (capability, motivation, opportunity;
Mitchie et al., 2014; in-class video)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a HIP?

A

A Health Improvement Practicioner (HIP) is an integrated role
within primary care settings; HIPs provide brief interventions
(30 minutes each session) to a large number of people (“a
little for a lot of people”) drawing on principles and models of
health behaviour change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where do HIPS work?

A

Work in teams, within larger organisations, GP practises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of work fo HIPs do? What type of problems do HIPs help people with?

A

-Brief 30 min behavioural change interventions

-One and one

-Focused on improving both mental/ physical health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the advantages of a HIP to patients? To the health sector?

A

Increases availability, more affordable, prevention, more connected with other health professionals, Strength based -> what are things they can draw on to improve outcomes?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do you become a HIP?

A

-Registration under a professional health body

-Then specific 6 month training to become a HIP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Decision science approaches to instigate behavioural change?

A

-Example : nudging

-Derive from behavioural economics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Main idea of Chapman (2019)

A

Chapman (2019) draws on principles of decision theory, arguing that it is important to understand decision processes underlying health choices
to encourage successful health behaviour change. A decision-science approach does not assume people are rational actors. Instead of engaging a person’s rational thought system to change their beliefs and attitudes, a decision-science approach bypasses this system and tries to change behaviour directly by managing
how information is presented and incentivised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Chapman (2019) three principles to instigate behavioural change

A

-Inform - the way information is presented not just the content matters (Framing, order of information, comparison)

-Incentivise - the way behaviour is rewarded matters. people are motivated by the loss of money and other people’s behaviour (behaviour incentives, social norms, social comparisons, prosocial motives)

-Guide - Behaviour can be guided by subtle environmental changes, which bypass trying to change beliefs and actions (cues and prompts, defaults, recommendations, self-control devices).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nudging definition

A

– A way to structure the environment to promote positive behavior with
minimal resistance from people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nudging origins

A

Grounded in behavioral economics with input from psychological scientists
like Daniel Kahneman.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nuding Examples

A

–Better choice as default (organ donation); water refill stations; textreminders to attend doctors’ appointment; heathier food first in a cafeteria line; larger
portion sizes for healthy food and smaller portion sizes for unhealthy food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nudging strengths

A

Nudges can be simple, low cost, and implemented at large scale;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nudging weaknesses

A

– Limited and fragile effect sizes, possible publication bias (only
publishing positive results), nudges may only work on people already positively
predisposed, concerning ethics (use of algorithms in social media, lack of consent to be nudged), may backfire (e.g., removing bottled water to reduce waste increased sugary drinks consumption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nudging video shown in class. What is it? What assumption does nudging rely on? What are some of the challenges with this technique?

A

Nudging = Deliberate and predictive methods of changing behaviours

Based on the assumption that many behaviours are due to automatic/ environmental cues not rational thoughts. Nudges therefore rearrange the environment/ cues to ‘nudge’ the individual to more healthy behaviours

Ethical aspects?
- The role of transparency = subtle rearrangements of choice architecture. Manipulate people in a direction they are not aware of.
○ Awareness of nudges may be okay though and not result in in-effectiveness ? - skeptical of this

  • The consequences of nudging = portrayed as on-short localised interventions -> within a specific situation. Need to research spillover effects to different situations, times. Are there long term effects that persist even once intervention is removed -> help form healthier habits rather than 1 off healthy choice? If not then nudges are fairly limited in their application.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Broad social science models (main idea of Van Bavel and Colleagues -2020)

A

Main Idea: Van Bavel and colleagues (2020) explained how principles from the social and behavioural sciences (like psychology, economics, and communication studies) help clarify how people respond to the Covid-19 crisis; these principles can also be used by public health experts and political leadership to guide their pandemic response. Many principles discussed were social in nature.

17
Q

Why are some cultures better suited to handle COVID 19 as explained by Van Bavel et al. (2020)?

A

-Some cultures have more emphasis on the collective good, whereas individualistic culture may struggle

-Tighter versus looser culture distinction. Tighter cultures = tighter norms, greater punishments for rule violations -> better covid response. Culture emphasising freedom may be worse off (e.g. America)

18
Q

Why does political polarization exacerbate the COVID-19 virus as was discussed in Van Bavel et al. (2020)?

A

-Political polarization decrease coordinated action among social groups

-Makes it hard to take unified action against COVID

19
Q

What does good leadership look like during a pandemic?

A

-Good leaders draw on psychological principles to create a shared identity to rally around a cause e.g. ‘we language’. ‘Team of 5 million’

20
Q

Three ways that psychological factors inform pandemic behaviour and influence susceptibility to catching and dying from covid….

A

(A) Psychological factors can influence biological susceptibility to virus via immune system.

(B) Psychological factors can influence behavioural susceptibility to virus (immunization rates, mask wearing,
compliance with level-restrictions, social distancing, handwashing, etc.)

(C) Psychological factors can influence acceptability of public policy (success or failure of leadership, and public
health campaigns).

21
Q

Biological susceptibility impacting COVID risk

A

-Big 4 health behaviours (smoking, alcohol, exercise, diet), plus poor
sleep and obesity; all of which promote chronic inflammation

-Chronic stress (next week’s PNI lecture)

-Lower positive emotional style (PES; Cohen, Doyle, Turner, Alper &
Skoner, 2003; next week’s PNI lecture)

-Poor social support, loneliness; hostile marriages (wound healing
video to be shown in next week’s PNI lecture)

-Contextual factors like SES and social determinants of health

-Other psychological factors associated with chronic inflammation e.g. Psychiatric conditions / mental health issues such as depression [proinflammatory cytokines elevated in depression, from next week’s PNI lecture and Alessi and Bennett (2019)]

22
Q

Cohen (2020) and the influence of biological susceptibility on covid risk

A

-Cohen (2020) described his team’s prior work using viral challenge trials
to explore what factors increase susceptibility to cold viruses. Viral
challenge trials involve bringing people into quarantine, giving them
viruses, and measuring their illness progression.

-Three factors increased susceptibility to upper respiratory illnesses
 Risky behaviours (smoking, poor sleep, etc.)
 Psychological stress
 Social relationships (poor integration and support)

  • Described potential implications for risk of illness from COVID-19 given
    overlapping symptoms between respiratory illnesses he studies and
    COVID-19.
23
Q

Why might the psychosocial factors outlined in Cohen (2020) lead to greater COVID susceptibility?

A

-Elevate the body’s cytokine levels, this can then cause chronic inflammation and reduce the body’s ability to fight off infection.

24
Q

Behavioural susceptibility to covid

A

-Individual differences in “germ aversion” and “disgust sensitivity”
are related to engagement in preventative health behaviors (social
distancing, handwashing, cleaning/disinfecting, avoiding touching
face, wearing facemasks) (Shook et al., 2020).

-Personality traits are also associated with greater COVID-19
concern (e.g., neuroticism) and preventative health behaviours (e.g.,
conscientiousness) (Shook et al., 2020).

25
Q

Disgust sensitivity as related to COVID risk (video)

A

-Disgust sensitivity= Highly sensitive to noticing and avoiding things in environment. Usually things that are going to cause disease.

-Individuals vary in their degree of this but we are all disgust sensitive to some extent (rooted in evolution).

-Behavioural immune system= set of behaviours that protect from illness which can be influenced by disgust sensitivity.

-Disgust sensitivity on the whole increased during COVID = increased awareness of risks (although again there was individual variation shown in the degree of this increase).

-Scent is a powerful cue that is part of disgust sensitivity. It alerts brain you shouldn’t consume food that is off.
(Brain areas that are important = Limbic system, hypothalamus). Your senses constantly scan the environment and inform the brain in order to predict outcomes. If something is foreign then more susceptible to disgust/ apprehension response

26
Q

Behavioural susceptibility to COVID
Shook, Sevi, Lee, Oosterhoff, and Fitzgerald (2020)

A

Measured “germ aversion” and “pathogen disgust sensitivity” as part of the Behavioural Immune System (BIS). The BIS is the first line against
pathogens – set psychological characteristics that help people identify and avoid getting sick from pathogens.

-Two personality traits were related to COVID 19 concern (consciousness and Neuroticism).

27
Q

Political orientation influence on covid vaccine hesitancy

A

-States with larger Trump vote shares are likely to gave more adults who are vaccine hesitant.

-Those that have a smaller share of residents already vaccinated than states with larger biden vote shares.

28
Q

Socioeconomic disparities in covid vaccine hesitancy?

A

Poorer households less likely to get the COVID19 vaccine
- Explained by access ?
- Lack of trust in government
- Is an example of SES health gradient

29
Q

Racial disparities in Covid 19 vaccine uptake?

A

Higher uptake in Asian populations
Followed by European
Pacific
Maori

  • Modelling in culture
    -Trust of people in the community/ government
30
Q

Public policy influence on Covid 19 risk

A

Psychological factors can influence acceptability of public policy (success or failure of leadership, and
public health campaigns).

-How messages are framed
-Collective “we” language, etc.

31
Q

Insights from Van Bavel and Colleagues (2020) regarding public policy surrounding COVID?

A

Main Idea: Van Bavel and colleagues (2020) explained how principles
from the social and behavioural sciences (like psychology, economics,
and communication studies) help clarify how people respond to the Covid19 crisis; suggested principles that public health experts and political
leadership can use to guide their pandemic response.