Week 1: Intro to Health Psychology, Models of Health and Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

What is Health Psychology?

A
  • Health psychology is sub-field of psychology that links psychological theory and practice to physical health.
    -It aims to understand the reciprocal influences between the mind and body (between mental and physical health).

-Thus health psychology research questions combine some aspect of psychology with some aspect of the physical body.

-Health psychology is both interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did health psychology come about?

A

-Health psychology is a relatively new sub-field of psychology and came about due to a shift in what people began dying from.

-Historically infectious diseases were responsible for a large portion of mortality. As time went on knowledge around safe hygiene practises increased, and the advent of medications to treat such illness occurred. This meant less people died from infectious disease ‘freeing’ them up to live longer and die from other causes.

-Death rates as measured in 2001 show diseases of the heart and cancers to be hugely influential in mortality while similar trends are shown in a study looking at US deaths in 2020.

-The exception to infectious diseases no longer being a primary cause of death is COVID (likely because we didn’t/ don’t know much about it- so don’t have effective medications etc.).

-In other words, people mostly die from chronic diseases in today’s society. -These diseases are generally of slow duration and progression resulting from an accumulation of health behaviours/ environment during an individual’s life span. Examples of chronic diseases include heart disease, stroke, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes.

-This shift therefore puts pressure on individuals to make the right decisions for their health and so health psychology arose to address this.

-While early psychologists were trained in medicine in the 1970s a growing epidemic of chronic diseases resulted in more and more psychologists beginning to work in medical settings conducting research to address the behaviour factors in chronic disease- there was also a shift in funding to support this.

-In 1978 the American Psychological association officially started a society for health psychology (division 38).
-Countries like the US and UK have been dominant in developing the field of health psychology but the discipline has now also filtered down to Australia and New Zealand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are chronic diseases + examples?

A

These diseases are generally of slow duration and progression resulting from an accumulation of health behaviours/ environment during an individual’s life span. Examples of chronic diseases include heart disease, stroke, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the implications for the role of psychology in maintaining health now that the majority of people in industrialised countries are dying from chronic disease (aside from the recent Covid-19 spike)?

A

Chronic diseases result from the accumulation of an individual’s health behaviours across the lifespan i.e. cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes. Psychology at its core is about influencing and understanding behaviour. Therefore psychology is essential in maintaining health - through psychology we can change the health behaviours of individuals and resulting in better outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Countries with biggest impact in developing health psychology as discipline?

A

-Countries like the US and UK have been dominant in developing the field of health psychology but the discipline has now also filtered down to Australia and New Zealand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

World health definition of health in 1948:

A

“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

“The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In what ways is the WHO (1948) definition of health ahead of it’s time?

A
  • Recognise three factors important in health: physical, mental and social well-being. This is a biopsychosocial model of health that aligns with Engel, 1977 i.e. ahead of time as the WHO definition came about in 1948!
  • Health as a right and one that is should be equally accessible to all regardless of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition. This is remarkable when you consider the unjust climate of the 1940s: certain groups of society were deemed by most as beneath others so WHO coming out and saying all should have equal access to health is a statement.
  • “Health is not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” - links to idea of health as an illness wellness continuum. At one end you have death and the at the other high level of wellness. In the middle is a neutral point where there is no discernible illness or wellness (i.e. absence of disease but not thriving). This continuum can be paralleled with one for mental health whereby at one end there is mental illness and the other complete mental health & flourishing. In both we see that it is not simply the absence of illness (either physical or mental) that defines optimum health but the presence of wellness (physical health continuum) and flourishing (mental health continuum). The WHO definition is therefore ahead of its time as it encompasses the ideas of positive psychology (a much more recent psychology subfield.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Health as a continuum? Mental health as a continuum?

A
  • Health can be conceptualized on a continuum: at one end you have death and the at the other high level of wellness. In the middle is a neutral point where there is no discernible illness or wellness (i.e. absence of disease but not thriving).

-This continuum can be paralleled with one for mental health whereby at one end there is mental illness and the other complete mental health & flourishing.

-In both we see that it is not simply the absence of illness (either physical or mental) that defines optimum health but the presence of wellness (physical health continuum) and flourishing (mental health continuum).

-links to positive psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is positive psychology?

A

mental health is not just the absence of mental illness but also requires the presence of ‘flourishing’. Relates to the WHO definition of health and the illness- wellness continuum whereby health is not merely the absence of physical illness but also the presence of ‘wellness’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Biomedical model of health: what is it? In what ways does it fall down?

A
  • Primary model up to the 20th century
  • Biological or physiological processes were studied separately from psychological processes
  • Highly western approach: individualistic, medicalized, mind-body dualism
  • Health has been understood within the biomedical model since the advent of modern science (e.g. anatomy)

PROBLEM: does not always follow that understand the physical state of an individual results in complete understanding of illness i.e. can have those with physical ‘markers’ of illness but don’t have illness symptoms or the reverse: can still be unwell with no physical abnormality to show for it (e.g. discogenic chronic lower back pain persisting after disc injury has ‘healed’).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Biopsychosocial model: What is it?

A
  • Three elements of health that interact:
    Biological (genes, cellular functioning, immune system), Psychological (behaviours and mental processes, cognition, emotion, motivation), Social (relationships with friends, family, society, community)

-Proposed by Engel, 1977 although also aligns with the WHO definition (1948)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Biopsychosocial model: in what ways does it challenge the biomedical model?

A
  • Engel challenged the separation of medicine from psychiatry, and criticized physicians who did not consider psycho-social contributors to illness.
  • Additionally, he claimed that the biomedical model is too reductionistic. In other words it assumed that the language of chemistry and physics suffices to explain biological phenomena ignoring the fact that there is often not a 1:1 correspondence between biochemical deficit and disease. Illness instead results from a complex interaction of factors.
  • The biomedical model also does not explain placebo effects (if illness is health is purely a result of biological/ physiological processes then how do beliefs like expectancy influence physical health.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the two Māori health models:

A

-Te Whare Tapa Wha
-The Meihana model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Te Whare Tapa Wha

A
  • Māori model of health proposed by sir Mason Durie (1985)
  • Durie proposed that a “full appreciation of health requires understanding of culture”
  • The WHO definition i.e. a biopsychosocial model lacks a spiritual aspect so this models adds it to create four elements in total
  • Additionally the “social well-being definition” from WHO/ biopsychosocial models prioritised structural inequalities rather than key interpersonal aspects of family (whanau, hapu, and iwi and thus is too individualistic for a Māori context.
  • Depicts health as a house with four sides: all four sides (spiritual wellbeing = te taha Wairau, mental and emotional wellbeing= te taha Hinengaro, physical well-being = te taha Tinana , family and social wellbeing = ta taha Whanau) holistically represent health and wellbeing without one the house will fall down. Note: whenua (land/ roots) is the foundation of this ‘house’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Meihana model

A
  • Developed in 2007 by Professor Suzanne Pitama (Ngāti Kahungunu)

-Framework and assessment tool for translating Te Whare Tapa Whā model into better serving Māori people within mental health service delivery.

-Contains the four aspects of Durie’s model (physical, emotional, spiritual, social) plus two more (physical environment & health services), and winds and currents (marinization, colonisation, racism, migration).

-Depicts health with an image of two wakas

-Patient is one waka and the family is the other: Recognises both as having equal importance for health

-Bridges between the waka (factors influencing health, note: spiritual represented elsewhere in image?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the distinction between basic and applied research in health psychology? Give some examples in health psychology?

A

Basic and applied are two different types of research goals in health psychology:
- Basic: The goal is to increase knowledge about health and behaviour for the sake of gaining knowledge. For example, examining the relationship between stress and immune function.

-Applied: The goal is to increase understanding of and find solutions to real-world health problems. For example, developing an intervention to result in behavioural change (i.e. to overcome smoking addiction).

17
Q

Do you think health psychology is more applied than other sub-fields in psychology? Why?

A

Health psychology, although can involve a mixture of approaches, I would say is slightly more applied that other subfields of psychology. An individual’s health is integral to daily functioning and therefore, many of the findings of health psychology centered around changing behaviours to improve health can have great immediate impact on quality of life. On the other hand a psychology subfield such as cognitive psychology focused on mental processes like attention, perception I would argue has a more basic bent. This isn’t to say that knowledge gained from this subfield can’t be applied to real-world problems but rather that these processes are prehaps less in our control/ harder to change than health behaviours. Some have argued however, that the applied/ basic distinction simply boils down to time i.e. applied findings are of use immediately whereas basic findings like uncovering a new theory will flow on to have practical effects.

18
Q

Four elements of the house in the Te Whare Tapa Wha

A

-Te taha tinana (the bodily side = bio-)

-Te taha hinengaro (the psychological side = -psycho-)

-Te taha whānau (the family side = -social)

-Te taha wairua (the spiritual side)

19
Q

From Taxonomy of Research Strategies: Research Setting

A
  • Laboratory: A study run in an experimenter-controlled environment, like the lab.

-Field: A study run in the real world, like someone’s home, a classroom or hospital setting
—-> May include observational techniques, self-report and experimental interventions, could use technology to ask how people are feeling as go about day
—-> Less control over extraneous variables.

20
Q

Advantages and disadvantages of field versus lab research…

A

-Lab = Tight control, poor Generalisability

-Field = Lose control (not able to get as clear of a signal), more Generalisability

21
Q

List the three types of study design

A

-Experimental

-Quasi experimental

-Non-experimental

22
Q

Experimental design

A

A study in which the researcher systematically varies one or more independent variables, holding all others constant, to see if a dependent variable is affected. Must involve random
assignment to groups.

-Term in psychology = true experiment
-Term in medicine = RCT (used to assess effectiveness of a given treatment/ intervention). When possible, placebos are used in control condition (to control for expectancy effects). Note that there are different phases within a clinical trial each requiring differing amounts of evidence.

23
Q

Single blind versus double bind in RCT

A
  • Single-blind: Only the researcher (not participant) knows the condition assignment.

-Double-blind: Neither the researcher nor participant knows the condition assignment.

24
Q

Quasi-experimental designs

A

A study comparing people in pre-existing groups (not randomly assigned) on a dependent variable. Suited for variables that cannot be randomly assigned (e.g.,
ethnicity; gender; people with cancer vs. not).

25
Q

Advantages of experimental designs

A

-Tight control (results In limiting ecological validity–> disadvantage)

-Use placebos for expectancy effects

-Gold standard for causality

26
Q

Disadvantages of experimental designs

A

-Low in ecological validity (application to real world)

-Expensive

-Not always generalisability due to smaller sample sizes (hard to run large
RCT’s–> expense constraints).

-Can’t always do RCT—> not everything can be randomised (pre-determined Characteristic of participants for example)

27
Q

Quasi- experimental designs

A

A study comparing people in pre-existing groups (not randomly assigned) on a dependent variable. Suited for variables that cannot be randomly assigned (e.g.,
ethnicity; gender; people with cancer vs. not). Also in cases when individual’s self- enroll i.e. ‘choose’ their group.

28
Q

Example of a quasi- experimental design type

A

Case-control / Ex post facto / Retrospective Design: A study comparing people in a preexisting ‘case’ group (not randomly assigned) (e.g., 100 people with cases of cancer) to a matched control group (e.g., 100 people selected of similar age, gender, and ethnicity without
cancer) on one or more dependent variables (e.g., family history; smoking; other risk behaviours). Typically used to determine risk factors present in the case versus control group. If risk factors from a person’s past are measured at the time of the study (via retrospective
assessment of medical and personal history), this is a retrospective design.

29
Q

Non-experimental designs

A
  • Also called Observational, and sometimes Correlational Designs)

Types:
-Cross-sectional- A study in which the researcher measures and examines variables at one time point for individuals of different age groups, or, for individuals in a given sample.

-Longitudinal: A study in which the researcher measures variables at multiple time points with
the same individuals over time. Enables examination of within-person relationships

-Case study: A study on a single individual involving construction of a systematic biography from records, history, interviews, and current observation. Case studies are especially helpful in documenting an unusual medical or psychological problem.

30
Q

Specific type of non-experimental longitudinal study?

A

Prospective study: A longitudinal study in which people are assessed for risk factors and then followed over time (‘prospectively’) to determine if a condition develops (a
dichotomous outcome) or if they vary in some other factor (a continuous outcome).

  • Length of assessments:
    o “macro-longitudinal” - assessments occurring over months, years or decades.
    o “micro-longitudinal” - assessments occurring frequently within a short time
    period (e.g., one week to a month) including ambulatory assessment..
31
Q

Data Collection Method types

A

o Self-report (e.g., questionnaires; interviews; free text responses; can be directed or open-ended)

o Observational (e.g., watching behaviour, facial expressions, brain activity via imaging techniques)

o Archival (e.g., researching past statistics; death certificates, etc.)

o Performance (e.g., response latency, scores on tests)

o Biological (e.g., saliva samples for genotyping, cortisol responses)

Note: can combine these in any given study study

32
Q

Data Analysis Method types

A

o Quantitative
-Experimental & quasi-experimental: chi-squared tests; t-tests; ANOVAs; ANCOVAs
-Non-experimental: correlation; regression; time-series; relative risk ratios

o Qualitative
-Discourse analysis; text analysis; content analysis
-Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)

33
Q

How come retrospective studies aren’t always the most reliable?

A

Retrospective studies (when ask people about things in the past) aren’t always reliable as people tend to have bad memory for things in the past and biased by current emotions/ situation

34
Q

What is the ‘next best thing’ after RCT to predict responses to certain intervention?

A

Prospective longitudinal designs

35
Q

Ecological momentary assessment

A

Ask people in the moment how they feeling as they go about their day to day lives e.g. could use text system

Advantages
1. Avoids memory or recall biases (alternative to asking people to retrospectively report how they feeling which might not produce accurate results e.g. retrospective pain reported at higher intensity than averaged momentary pain)

  1. Provides greater resolution in how processes unfold over time (More intensive tracking during the intervention period can give better idea of how intervention is having effect across time )
  2. Enables testing of “within-person patterns”
36
Q

Sources of qualitative data

A

 Interview transcripts (from audio, video or email)

 Focus group transcripts (real-world or online)

 Answers to open-ended questions within questionnaires ordiaries (‘free text’ answers)

 Existing documents

 Media sources (magazines, TV, internet- tweets! etc.)

 Photographs or other forms of artistic representation