Week 8: Etiology and Maintenance of Depression (2) Flashcards

1
Q

What do we already know about depressed youth

4 things

A

We already know depressed youth are:

Less prosocial
Less assertive
More avoidant and withdrawn
Some children with depression are also more hostile and aggressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interpersonal Theories of Depression

A

Children and adolescents may be responding to challenging interpersonal situations in problematic ways

We know, for example, that responding by aggressing or
withdrawing when someone aggresses against you may result in continued experience of aggression

We also know that being treated poorly by peers results in increased
depression

Are children and adolescents experiencing depression getting
trapped in a vicious cycle?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stress Exposure vs. Stress Generation

A

Stress Exposure Models of Depression

  • Depression results from exposure to stressful events (robust finding)
  • Experience of stress precedes the experience of depression
  • Peer rejection leads to an increase in depression

Stress Generation Models

  • Depression may lead individuals to generate stressful life events
  • Difficulties in interactions may cause interpersonal problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stress Generation Models of Depression

Study

A

88 children

Clinically referred (so already seeking help)

Using a clinical interview, placed participants into the following diagnostic groups:

(1) Depressed only
(2) Externalizing only
(3) Both (comorbid)
(4) Neither (clinic control)

Assessed experience of life stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Objective/Subjective assessment of stress

A

Subjective - how a person experiences a problem

Objective - how an outsider might assess a problem

Depression is associated with subjective stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stress Generation Models of Depression

How was stress assessed

A

Stressful episodes rated by researchers along several dimensions:

Severity

  • No stress/impact to severe stress/impact
  • Rated by a team based on detailed information about what happened

Academic

  • Failed a test at school, has otherwise done okay in that class, and has a decent overall GPA
  • Failed a class at school, has to go to summer school to make it up, but will graduate high school on time
  • Failed a class at school, this is the second class this year, and graduation will be delayed

Extent to which child contributed to the event
-Completely independent to completely dependent

Independent: Your dad got a new job and you had to move and start at a new school where you don’t
know anyone

Dependent: You did not study for your test because you wanted to hang out with your friend instead and
you got a really bad grade

Interpersonal or non interpersonal

  • Fight with a friend
  • Failing a test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stress Generation Models of Depression

Results

A

Depression was associated with dependent, interpersonal stress
-This association was stronger than the relationship between
externalizing disorders and dependent interpersonal stress

Depression was not associated with dependent, non-interpersonal stress
-Externalizing disorders were associated with dependent, non-interpersonal stress

Depression was not associated with independent stressors

Neither were externalizing disorders

BUT these kids were clinically referred, they may be experiencing more of these than non-referred kids, we do not know that
DEFFO not associated with depression though as not different to externalizing disorders

Children with comorbidity experienced the highest levels of both interpersonal and non interpersonal dependent stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stress Generation Models of Depression

How do youth with depression generate problematic interpersonal circumstances

A

Youth with depression more likely to generate problematic interpersonal circumstances

These interpersonal circumstances, in turn, may exacerbate depression

See similar patterns for:

Life hassles
-Internalizing symptoms predicts life hassle, and life hassles predict subsequent internalizing symptoms

Victimization
-Internalizing symptoms predict victimization, and victimization
predict subsequent internalizing symptoms

Viscous circles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Friends are a critically important part of healthy development

A

Protect children from feelings of loneliness and depression

Children with friendships are less likely to be victimized by peers

Provides an opportunity to develop important social skills

For children with depression, may be difficult to maintain healthy,
meaningful relationships

Features of friendships may be contributing to their symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What have studies shown when observing depressed kids interacting with their freinds?

A

Studies have observed children with depression interacting with their
friends

Have noticed the friends’ affect becoming more negative over the
course of the interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Co-rumination

A

Rumination is the tendency to dwell on problems and not solve them

Co rumination is when two friends do it together

Paradox

Sharing and intimacy are associated with better friendships

Rumination and dwelling on bad things are associated with negative mood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does co-rumination look like study

A

Boys and girls in 3 rd , 5 th , 7 th , and 9 th grade

Completed measures about:

  • Internalizing symptoms (anxiety and depression)
  • Friendship nominations
  • Identified best friend dyads
  • Friendship quality and closeness

Co rumination
-“When we talk about a problem one of us has, we usually talk about that
problem every day even if nothing knew has happened”
-“When we talk about a problem one of us has, we try to figure out
everything about the problem, even if there are parts we may never
understand”

RESULTS

Co rumination predicts positive friendship quality

Co rumination also predicts internalizing symptoms

(does not tell us anything about temporal order)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does co-rumination look like study

follow up for temporal order

A

Co rumination at one time point predicts later increases in friendship quality and internalizing symptoms

So co-rumination is causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Co- rumination and depressive symptoms

Study

A

Are some components of co rumination more problematic than others?

Observational task

Two adolescent friends come to the lab

Each identifies a problem they are having

Talk about your problems, make sure you talk about each person’s problem, if you finish, you can talk about something else or do the
puzzle that’s on the table

Coded different types of behavior

Found that dwelling on negative affect was associated with
depressive and anxious symptoms, and was not associated with
friendship quality
LOOKS LIKE A GOOD TARGET FOR TREATMENT

In contrast, (a) discussing the problem repeatedly (rehashing), and
(b) speculating about what might happen were associated with
increased friendship quality and closeness, but not greater depressive or anxious symptoms
LEAVE ALONE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reassurance Seeking

A

Children want others to demonstrate that they care about them, tell them that they are okay, etc.

Initially, people will do this

Person thinks they don’t mean it, and seeks more reassurance

As child ignores this, there is no positive reinforcement for the friend, so they stop

Overtime, this becomes irritating and/or invalidating

Eventually, the child will be rejected

Reassurance seeking is associated with unstable friendships

As one friend does reassurance seeking, the other experiences a decrease in friendship quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contagion

A

Do friends share depressive symptoms?

Among adolescents, yes

One friends depression at time 1 predicts the other’s at time 2

This is MEDIATED by co-rumination.

Measured as a variable by both friend’s reports, average of both friend’s reports

Co-rumination mediates the relationship

We see contagion because friends co-ruminate and dwell on negative affect

This leads to subsequent depression

17
Q

Summary

A

Features of interpersonal relationships and interpersonal interactions
may serve to maintain depressive symptoms in youth

Depression is associated with greater levels of interpersonal stress

Youth with depression may be interacting with friends in ways that cause challenges in those relationships (reassurance seeking) or that increase depressive
symptoms (co-rumination and dwelling on negative affect)