Week 5: Definition of substance use disorders Flashcards
Substance Use Disorder definition
Substance Use Disorder
Different substances
Alcohol, Cannabis, Opiods, Hallucinogens, Inhalants, Sedatives, Hypnotics, Anxiolytics, Tobacco, Other
Problematic pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress as manifested by at least two symptoms
occurring within a 12-month period
Examples:
Continued alcohol use despite having persistent or recurrent social or
interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by use
Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or
reduced because of alcohol use
Use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent
physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or
exacerbated by alcohol
Is experimenting with alcohol common?
Experimentation is very common
In the United States, 2/3 of students in Grade 12 and nearly ½ of
students in Grade 10 report drinking alcohol in the past year
Adolescence is a Risk Period for Substance Use Problems
Earlier use starts the more likely it is to become problematic
15.1% of individuals who start drinking by 14 develop alcohol use disorder, compared to 2.1% of those who start at age 21 or older
Research trying to disentangle the extent to which early onset is a risk marker versus a risk factor
Substance use in adolescence is associated with the three leading causes of death for adolescents: accidents, suicide, homicide
Also, educational problems and legal problems
Even though common, still dangerous
Prevalence
Lifetime prevalence of any substance use disorder NCS-A Adolescents aged 13 to 18 years: 11.4% 13-14 year olds: 3.7% 15-16 year olds: 12.2% 17-18 year olds: 22.3% Rates are higher among youth experiencing other mental health problems
Treatment Models
Early Brief Interventions
Outpatient Treatment
Residential Inpatient Treatment
Early, Brief Interventions
Norm-based interventions for college students
These target norms about drinking
Injunctive norms: How much others approve or disapprove of
drinking
Descriptive norms: How much others actually drink
Norm-Based Interventions
American university students overestimate how much their peers drink
Incidentally, American high school students overestimate how much sex their peers are having
Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students
Individualized feedback about:
Actual drinking norms
Comparison between individual’s drinking pattern and the norm
1) This is how much you drink
2) This is how much you think others drink
3) This is how much others actually drink
4) Percentile ranking showing where you are relative to others on your campus
Norm-Based Interventions (evidence)
Screened 1115 students
Identified 481 students who reported at least one heavy drinking episode (5-4 drinks in one sitting for men and women respectively)
252 students (148 women) took part
Participants and non-participants did not differ on amount of drinking reported
Randomly assigned to intervention or control
Baseline Perceived drinking norms Drinking behavior Intervention Received feedback immediately Presented on screen for a minute and given a print out to take home No interpersonal interaction Follow ups at three and six months
Norm-Based Interventions results
At both 3 and 6 months, amount of drinking in the intervention group was reduced, relative to the control group
At both 3 and 6 months, perceived norms were reduced (intervention group was reporting that peers drink less than control group)
Changes in perceived norms MEDIATED the association between the intervention and reduced drinking
Intervention predicted decrease in perceived norms at three months, which predicted decreases in drinking at 6 months
So these were self-reported so possible this is a lie
However self reported and actual observed drinking amounts are correlated
There is no judgement here. No one else is involved. This is a strength
Outpatient Treatment
Family Therapy
Alcoholics Anonymous (12 Step Programs)
Family therapy for substance use
Multidimensional Family Therapy Similar to MST Adolescent E.g., Use as a means of coping with distress Parents E.g., increased parental monitoring
Therapist tries to understand why they drink. Who is it benefitting? e.g. if the adolescent is drinking to self-medicate for stress, this will not go away until they have other ways to control stress
A large number of studies have shown that family therapy results in better substance use outcomes for adolescents, compared to a
number of control conditions, including other types of therapy (e.g.,
group CBT)
Alcoholics Anonymous
Very popular People experiencing problematic alcohol use seek out AA more than all other forms of treatment combined 12 steps Acknowledge that alcohol is a problem Recommend abstinence Supported by a peer Easily accessible More than 30 meetings in Montreal today Global
This means you can usually find a meeting wherever you are
Alcoholics Anonymous (3 hypotheses)
Participation in AA is associated with less alcohol consumption and fewer substance related problems
Three hypotheses:
1) AA attendance → Lower alcohol use
2) Lower alcohol use → AA attendance
3) Good prognosis (e.g., better motivation, less co-morbid psychopathology) → Lower alcohol use and AA
AA evidence (bad)
Results of randomized trials comparing AA to another form of treatment or to a no treatment control group suggest AA does not do better and may do worse
However, there are very few well-done studies
In several of the randomized trials, participants were coerced into treatment (e.g., court referred)
This last point calls into question the external validity of these results
AA evidence (good)
More recently …
Study examining 2000 men seeking treatment for alcohol use at VA
hospital
All met criteria for a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder
Received treatment
After finishing treatment, researchers followed them and collected data about their substance use and their attendance at AA meetings
1) AA attendance → Lower alcohol use
AA involvement at 1 year post treatment predicted less alcohol use at 2 years post treatment
2) Lower alcohol use → AA attendance
Alcohol use at year 1 did not predict AA involvement at year 2
3) Good prognosis (e.g., better motivation, less co-morbid psychopathology) → Lower alcohol use and AA
Results not explained by alcohol use severity, motivation, or comorbid psychopathology
Which points to AA being causal
IF not evidence based, it is free so why not try it