Week 12: Dissemination Flashcards
Dissemination
Many youth will experience significant mental health problems
We have treatments of demonstrated efficacy for a number of these challenges
Treatment Efficacy versus Effectiveness
Treatments have demonstrated efficacy
Efficacy: Can this treatment work?
Tested in RCTs
Patients recruited for studies who often do not represent “real world”
presentation
Therapists who are highly trained to administer an intervention
Different conditions then we see in practice
May have graduate students ONLY doing this and so have lots of time to focus on it - unrealistic in the real world
Treatments have demonstrated efficacy
Efficacy: Can this treatment work?
Tested in RCTs
Patients recruited for studies who often do not represent “real world”
presentation
Therapists who are highly trained to administer an intervention
Different conditions then we see in practice
Are Evidence-Based Interventions
Being Used in Usual Care?
Not as widely as you would think
Treatment in community is much more eclectic and based upon therapist’s personal preferences
For example, therapists in community-mental health clinic reported using more psychodynamic techniques during treatment of depression than cognitive and behavioral techniques (Weersing & Weisz, 2002)
Even though at the time CBT had a stronger evidence base vs depression
Why Not?
Efficacy versus effectiveness
Concerns about treatments in the real world
Complex case presentations
More severe psychopathology
Cultural differences
Rapport - therapists worry they will lose rapport by being to manualized
Manuals too inflexible
Bridging the gap
Bridging the gap between research and practice (researchers are responsible for this)
Disseminating evidence-based treatments and assessments
Recall that evidence-based assessments (e.g., structured and semistructured interviews) perform better than unstructured interviews
Will be significant advantages to incorporating those in treatment
Is Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for Youth
Depression Associated with Greater Improvement in
Symptoms?
Compared:
Treatment as usual in community clinics
“Gold standard” treatment – CBT administered in randomized clinic
trials
They finish at the same place BUT the evidenced method gets there faster
ALSO depression naturally remits. It is possible that the non evidence based group was just due to this remittance
Evidence-Based Psychotherapy
versus Usual Care
Meta-analysis
Studies comparing evidence-based treatments to treatment as
usual (usual care)
E.g., MST versus care as usual
Usual care defined as “psychotherapy, counseling, or other nonmedication interventions provided through outpatient clinics, public programs, and agencies or residential facilties:
Meta-analysis found that youth receiving EBTs showed greater
improvement that youth receiving usual care
But ….
The difference was not large
EBP may be less efficacious than we thought and usual care may be
more efficacious
Difference between EBP and usual care was smaller when
symptoms were more severe
When all participants in the sample met criteria for a diagnosis, the
difference between EBP and usual care was not significant
Difference between EBP and usual care was the same for White
youth and racialized youth
Maybe cos the participants of the studies were better in the first place
We need to design studies to reflect real world conditions
Summary
Many youth will experience significant psychological symptoms
Basic research is ongoing to try to understand etiology and maintenance of those problems
Apply research to developing more effective interventions
Testing under real-world conditions
Dissemination of evidence-based interventions
How do we make it better and get it out there?