Week 12: Prevention of youth psychopathology Flashcards

1
Q

Prevention

A

 Can we stop children’s mental health problems before they start?
 Identify risk factors and target those
 Child maltreatment
 Identify high risk populations and intervene before problems begin
 Youth whose parents have experienced depression (more prone to depression)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Preventing Child Maltreatment

A

 Risk factor for many types of disorders
 Conduct problems
 Depression
 Eating disorders
 Can we reduce incidence of child abuse?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nurse-Family Partnership Program

NFP; David Olds

A
Support for mothers “at risk”
 Low income
 Single 
 Young (under age 19)
 Treatment model
 Structured home visits
 Education and social support (like do not smoke)
 High intensity during pregnancy
 High intensity immediately post-pregnancy (6 weeks)
 Lower intensity through age 2 ½
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NFP Target Outcomes

A
 Pregnancy
 Smoking and substance use
 Premature births
 Caregiving
 Abuse
 Neglect (e.g., accidents)
 Maternal “life course”
 Education and employment
 Number and spacing of additional births
 Long-term youth behavio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

NFP Elmira Study

A

 Participants
 400 pregnant women
 62% not married
 47% younger than 19 years
 61% lower income
 89% non-Hispanic White (reflects upstate NY)
 Design
 Random assignment
 “Usual services” (e.g., development screening)
 NFP
 Two groups
 One received home visits during pregnancy only and the second
received visits both during and after pregnancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

NFP Elmira Outcomes

A
◼ Pregnancy outcomes
– 25% less smoking
– Fewer infections
– Fewer pre-term deliveries
◼ Dysfunctional caregiving
– 27% fewer ER visits
– 56% fewer accidents
– 80% less abuse (verified)
– Effects strongest for women with least resources

Less times:

Running away, stopped by police, convictions and probation violations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NFP Outcomes

A

 Significant effects on pregnancy outcomes, parental behavior
 In general, saw effects for the group that was visited only during pregnancy that were between the control group and the group that
was also visited during infancy
 Also saw effects on children’s behavior 15 years later
 Saw benefits for both treatment groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intervening to Stop Child

Maltreatment

A

 In Olds’ program, women are visited during pregnancy
 Can a similar program when children are older stop child abuse?
 MacMillan et al. 2005 designed a nurse-home visitation program targeting stopping recurrence of child abuse

This means it was given to families which were already known to be maltreating kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MacMillan et al. 2005

A

 Families randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group

 Control group:
 Standard services provided by child protection agency
 E.g., Follow up by social workers, education

 Treatment group
 Standard services
 Home visits (1.5 hours) by a public-health nurse every week for six months,
then every two weeks for six months, and then monthly for twelve months
 Nurse visits focused on family support, parent education, and helping
families get services needed (e.g., special education, employment services)
 Goal was to reduce stressors and increase support

 Primary outcome was reports of child abuse/neglect made to CPA
 Research assistants went through CPA records and identified cases
of abuse or neglect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MacMillan et al. 2005

Results

A

 Found that the intervention had no effect
 No differences between intervention and control group
 Were not seeing lower rates of recurrence in the intervention group
 Incidences in the intervention group were as severe as incidences in the
control group

 Findings suggest that once a family is involved with Child Protective
Services it may be hard to help
 Importance of intervening before the problem starts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prevention

A

 Can we stop children’s mental health problems before they start?
 Identify risk factors and target those
 Child maltreatment
 Identify high risk populations and intervene before problems begin
 Youth whose parents have experienced depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parental Psychopathology

A
 Parental psychopathology associated with a number of 
problematic outcomes in childhood
 Disorders often “run in families”
 Genetics
 Environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Parental Depression

A

 Primary prevention (i.e., targeting children in general) has not been
very effective - like just going to an elementary school does nto work
 Programs targeting high-risk samples
 Children of parents with depression are at higher risk for developing
a depressive disorder

SO FOCUS ON THESE KIDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Group CBT

A

 Coping with Stress course
 15, 45 minute group sessions
 Taught cognitive techniques - just like 1-1 CBT
 E.g., identifying and challenging negative thoughts
 Reduce negative thoughts before sub-clinical symptoms become
more significant
 Can we:
 Reduce symptoms?
 Prevent depressive episodes?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Clark et al. 2001

A

Initial recruitment letters sent
by physicians to parents
with depression and
teenage children (N = 3374)

Youth categorized as 
subsyndromal and agreed 
to randomization (N = 94)
(i,e, not yet had MDD episode, we are trying to stop it)
Group CBT (N = 45)
Usual Care (N = 49) 

RESULTS

 Youth in experimental group less likely to experience a depressive episode than youth in control group
 At 16 months, 90% of youth in experimental group remained nondepressed, compared with 70% in control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Garber et al. 2009

A
 Generalizability of intervention
 Basically the same intervention
 Slight format changes
 8 weekly 90 minute sessions
 6 monthly continuation sessions
 316 adolescents in 4 sites
 Randomized to CBT intervention or usual care

 Rate of depressive episodes lower for the intervention group
 Symptoms declined at a greater rate for youth in intervention group
 Demonstrates that this intervention can be delivered by clinicians
other than those who designed the intervention

Replicated :)

17
Q

Summary

A

 Prevention programs can have a significant impact, even many years after the intervention takes place
 Demonstrates importance of sound theoretical model and understanding of more basic processes