Week 8: Concepts and their Representation in the Brain Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is semantic knowledge?

A

is a category of long-term memory

Involves = Recollection of ideas, concepts, and facts (general knowledge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does conceptual mean?

A

• Something to do with the mind or mental concepts

E.g.: When you formulate an abstract philosophy to explain the world which cannot be proven or seen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

So what is conceptual semantic knowledge?

A

We want to know how we ‘represent’ something in the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the types of mental represenation?

A

Analogical

Symbolic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is analogical mental representation?

A

This is a mental representation that has some of the physical characterisations of an object.

E.g. A picture of a violin

A picture of a violin isn’t actually a real violin, but it has similar characterisations

Examples of analogical representations =

  • Maps
  • Pictures
  • Diagrams
  • Flow charts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is symbolic represenatation?

A

This is a mental representation that allows us to think about objects or stuff in the environment.

Involves the use of =

  • Signs
  • Symbols

It does not correspond to the physical features of an object or idea

E.g. the word ‘violin’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Advantage of symbolic representation?

A

Symbolic representations are more suited to represent concepts because of their flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Concept vs category

A

concept =

A concept has been viewed as a mental representation that picks out a category.

E.g.: Every person has a concept of a dog (mental representation) and can use that concept to pick out a category of things that one would call dogs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is categorisation sensitive to goals and contexts?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Are concepts used for semantic classification?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the classical view?

A

• Argue that a set of features is necessary and sufficient to be a member of a category

  • Necessary = Each feature must be present
  • Sufficient = If each feature is present that’s all you need

• This means that every member of a category possesses the same characteristics

  • E.g.: To be a member of the category ‘bachelor’ it must possess the features: an unmarried adult male
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criticisms of classical view?

A

all things can sometimes be in category and has “necessary” features

  • Typicality effect = Slower reaction times when making a category judgment. E.g. : for “penguin is a bird” compared to “robin is a bird” (Rips et al. 1973)
  • Some members are “more members” (Rosch & Mervis, 1975)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the prototype model?

A
  • Argue that concepts of something E.g. ‘bird’ are organised around similarity to a prototype
  • So a robin or a sparrow can be a good prototype or a “good example” of the category bird, WHEREAS a penguin or an ostrich is a “bad example” of this category
  • So when we think about a concept we think about the “best” category member
  • Membership of the category is defined on = The basis of a ‘typical’ set of features
  • Membership doesn’t necessarily mean the possession of all characteristics (different to the classical view)
  • This model is = flexible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Criticisms of prototype model?

A
  • Some concepts are determined by definition rather than similarity to a prototype
  • Typicality is sensitive to context =
  • Two objects may have the same level of typicality but one may be more suited for certain contexts compared to the others
  • E.g. : Category of ‘bird’ more likely to be given to chicken if seen in a farm than a city scene
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What disorders inform us about the organisation of semantic knowledge brain in the brain?

A
  • Semantic Dementia
  • Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Injury following stroke
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is gradual loss of semantic knowledge?

A

This is when concepts deteriorate gradually with some aspects of their meaning being lost before others

17
Q

What is partial loss?

A

Partial information is a part of information lost. The knowledge is gone.
• So concepts are made up of features, and these features are gradually lost over time, NOT the whole thing!

E.g. features of a helicopter

18
Q

What hemisphere supporta semantic memory?

A

Right and Left hemisphere

  • If one hemisphere is damaged OR more severely damaged then the other hemisphere will compensate for the knowledge.
  • This isn’t noticeable in speech but brain activity is reduced in the damaged area
19
Q

Brain damage affects certain categories of concepts and not others, which concepts are affected?

A
  • Problems more often with living things
  • Problems with non-living things much rarer
  • Living things share more features with each other than non-live things. E.g. discriminating a tiger from a cat is harder to state the differences. BUT if you distinguish a hammer from a screwdriver, they don’t share much.
  • Patient will find it harder to name a tiger because they have to look at finer details, but can tell between non-living objects (but still difficulty).
20
Q

What evidence supports that brain damage affects certain categories of concepts and not others?

A

Herpes simplex Encephalitis (HSE) =

causes lesion to the antero-medial temporal lobe.

21
Q

What does patterson (

2007) want to find out?

A

How our brain represents semantic memory.

22
Q

What are the two models patterson proposed about semantic memory?

A

Distributed only view: No specific hub for semantic knowledge

Distributed + hub : Specific hub for semantic knowledge

23
Q

What is Distributed only view: No specific hub for semantic knowledge?

A
  • This model argues that conceptual bits are widely distributed, are stored in sensory AND motor areas relevant to the concept.
  • This is bound together via connections between the various areas.
  • There is no specific region or hub that stores semantic knowledge .
  • Concepts are stored in independent areas in the brain (E.g. Name is more near the Broca’s area) and they interconnect together.
  • There is no single ‘core area’ responsible for semantic knowledge.
  • Conclusion = There is no single area coordinating the linkages between conceptual bits
  • This model predicts = If there is an impairment it will not be generalised to all the areas. E.g. remembering a cat – semantic memory of the sounds of the concept would be impaired but not the picture of the concept.
  • Evidence comes from lesion studies of semantic memory disorder
24
Q

What is Distributed + hub : Specific hub for semantic knowledge?

A
  • This model is the opposite of the “distributed-only” model.
  • It argues that conceptual bits are WIDELY distributed in sensory-motor areas BUT these linkages areas are coordinated by a single “hub” in the Anterior temporal lobe (red area)
  • This model predicts = Lesions to the ‘hub’ will lead to semantic impairments all over. E.g. semantic knowledge about a cat will all be forgotten because everything is interconnected in one hub. Objects, sounds, pictures, words associated with that concept will be impaired!
  • Evidence comes from lesion studies of semantic memory disorders

Evidence for a semantic hub: Semantic dementia:
- Semantic dementia is characterised by focal lesions in the anterior temporal lobes (Focal lesion = Focal brain lesions are a consequence of head trauma, cerebral infarcts or intracerebral hemorrhages)

  • There is a loss across all semantic modalities (expect numeric representations – numbers are retained)
25
Q

Do we see see category-specific regions in posterior areas?

A

Yes

This supports the argument that there are individual modules in the brain that support specific categories of specific modalities

In the posterior areas especially the parietal lobe = They find that if patients have lesions in that area, the patients show an impairment in naming non-living things (E.g. hammer).