Week 6: Emotions and interpersonal relations Flashcards
What is the evolutionary approach to emotions?
- Emotions are physiological responses to stimuli in the world
- Emotions as invariant, in-born, biological reactions
- Assumes universality of emotional experience
What is the social-constructionist approach?
- Emotions are the interpretations of physiological responses
- Emotions are highly variable, contextualized responses
- Focus on (cultural) variability in emotional experience
What are the basic emotions?
happiness, disgust, surprise, sadness, anger, and fear. However, there is debate about whether emotions like contempt, shame, embarrassment, interest and pride should be added to the basic emotions.
Are facial expressions universal?
The idea that we express our emotions similarly is old and stems from the idea that emotions have adaptive value and based on biological make-up. This is why the history of cross-cultural study of emotions started with the quest for basic, universal emotional expressions (expressions are the ‘objective’ & visible aspect of emotional experience).
What did experiments find about this?
Pictures of facial expressions of expressions were shown to those in various cultures, had to select the emotion term that fits best to the picture. Emotions were correctly recognized with 80-90% in USA, Brazil, Chile, Argentina etc. However, there is exposure via tv to foreign faces & their emotion expression, all 5 societies industrialized and literate. For Fore there was accurate identification above chance of only some emotions. There is no one-to-one mapping between emotions and face as there was only limited number of options, which could have been chosen by process of elimination. Happiness is consistently recognized about chance levels.
What was found about basic emotions in the Fore culture?
They were asked to imagine how they would feel, and made a corresponding facial expression in response to different situations, which was similar to the West. But surprise and sadness were not recognized among the Fore
What are display rules?
Culturally specific rules that govern which facial expressions are appropriate in a given situation and how intensely they should be exhibited. So emotional experiences are unaffected by emotional expressions. Presuppose that emotion is universal “at the core”, so the experience is consistent but expressions can differ
What is ritualized display?
a facial expression that is expressed in some cultures but not in others. Such facial expressions differ from the alleged universal facial expressions.
What are the examples of display rules?
- Emotional “smoothness” – Bali
Avoid strong displays of emotional feelings, both positive and negative - Never in anger – Utku Inuit
Expressions of anger are condemned altogether - Defend honor – certain Arab contexts. Respond to an insult with intense expression of anger
What is the facial feedback hypothesis?
Facial expressions are one source of information we use when we infer our emotional experiences. When manipulating facial muscles, affects the funniness of cartoons but not always replicated. Botox treatment also reduces the speed of reading emotional sentences. Though display rules certainly exist, these findings show that expression affects experience and that what we observe is not only variation in expression but also experience
What was found when participants were asked to hold a pen between their teeth without touching their lips and between their lips without touching their teeth?
The smiling condition (not touching lips) found the cartoons to be more amusing than the frowning condition. So display rules cannot be used to argue that emotions are experienced the same universally and that only their expression differs
Ingroup advantage
More accurate recognition within same culture/ language group (9% above the 58% accuracy average). Reasons for this:
- More exposure & familiarity with expressions of one’s own culture
- Decoder differences in effort due to ingroup identification
- Encoder differences in display
What are the problems with the recognition paradigm?
- no context
- forced choices results in elimination
- answers teach emotion concepts
What is universal about the face?
- Valence (positive / negative)
- Inferences about social motives (using faces to infer another person’s intentions)
- But, newer research with the same samples used more varied and less constrained methods so find less evidence for universality
How does emotional experience differ for independent vs interdependent selves?
Independent: personal differentiation, concerned about how events distinguish one from others, emotions considered intrapersonal that lie within the individual, disengaged emotions more common like pride and anger
Interdependent: interpersonal harmony, concerned about how events affect close others as well as oneself, emotions are interpersonal states that connect people with each other, interpersonally engaged emotions are more common like respect and shame.
What did results find when participants had to deal with a rude experimenter for Chinese-Canadians vs European-Canadians?
Both groups initially responded with similar degrees of anger, but Chinese Canadians’ blood pressure returned to normal much more quickly than Europeans. All the participants suppressed the anger, which led to a slower decrease in anger for Europeans than Chinese Canadians. East Asians seem to experience less intense anger and seem to be more comfortable with strategies of suppressing their anger, while Westerners seem to suffer from physiological consequences after not being able to express their anger.
How did Japanese and American participants answer questions about their emotional experiences based on positive/negative valence and engagement?
American: more positive interpersonally disengaged emotions were correlated with more positive feelings in general.
Japanese: more positive interpersonally engaged emotions were correlated with more positive feelings in general.
So those with interdependent self-views feel more happy with interpersonal engaged positive emotions, while independent individuals feel more happy with disengaged positive emotions
How do cultures differ in emotions words?
Differ in the number of emotion words: English: >2000, Dutch: 1500, Taiwanese Chinese: 750, Malay: 230, Ifalukian in Micronesia: 58, Chewong in Malaysia: 8. There is cultural diversity in emotion words with different clusters of meaning that are encountered in different cultures
What are some examples of emotion words?
Schadenfreude in German: the feelings of pleasure that one gets when witnessing the hard times that befall another.
Amae in Japanese: pleasant feelings when you emphasize your dependence on another or closeness, involving inappropriate behaviour to demonstrate security. Has connotations of immaturity but key in loving relationships
What are the different views on the diversity of emotion words?
- The diversity in emotion words is meaningless because our language does not affect our underlying psychological experience
- The diversity in emotion words reflect cultural diversity in emotional experiences, i.e., the way we think is influenced by the words we use
What is subjective well-being?
the feeling of being satisfied with one’s life. Studies reveal clear cultural variability in subjective wellbeing. Many factors contribute to a culture’s average subjective well-being (income level, human rights protection). However, many nations depart from the patterns that would be predicted by those factors, suggesting that there must be other influences on well-being that have yet to be identified.
What are the factors that influence people’s judgements of life satisfaction?
1) Source of well-being: judgment of life satisfaction has a different main source for different cultures.
2) Personal theories: people have different theories about how happy they think they should feel.
3) Positive emotions: positive emotional experiences have different consequences across cultures.
4) Ideal affect: the kinds of positive emotions people desire also varies across cultures.