Week 4: Self & motivation Flashcards
Independent self-concept
a model/concept/construal of self in which identity is thought to come from inner attributes that reflect a unique essence of the individual and that remain stable across situations and across the lifespan. Self is seen as distinct from others.
Interdependent self-concept
a model/concept/construal of the self in which individuals are perceived not as separate and distinct entities but as participants in a larger social unit (relational entity), where identity is contingent upon key relationships with ingroup members. Others are an extension of the self.
Twenty-statements test
an exercise in which people describe themselves by finishing 20 statements starting with “I am…”. People with an independent self tend to answer with personality characteristics (“I am creative”), while people with an interdependent self tend to answer with social roles like (“I am a younger brother”).
What are the different sets of answers to the 20 statements test?
One set: abstract traits, stable characteristics that exist by themselves
Other set: relationships and roles, context-dependent behaviours
What was found when applying the 20 statements test to American undergraduates, Kenyan undergraduates, workers and 2 indigenous Kenyan groups?
American and Kenyan undergrads were more likely to describe themselves with personality characteristics than roles and memberships like social identity.
Indigenous Kenyans were more likely to describe themselves in their social identity. There are substantial differences within cultures despite speaking the same language
What are the possible explanations for these results?
urbanization (living in the capital of the country); Westernization (tv, media); lifestyle (not living within an extended family); education (having received formal schooling)
How is independent self-concept represented?
- Self is experienced as distinct from others (circle of individual doesn’t overlap with others)
- Key aspects of the self lie within the individual (large X= core attitudes, traits, abilities)
- Self is stable (circle around self is solid)
- Ingroup boundaries permeable (still feel closer to ingroup but do not view outgroup as fundamentally distinct)
How is interdependent self-concept represented?
- Self overlaps considerably with an individual’s significant relationships, identities are closely connected with others
- Key aspects of the self (X) are based on significant relationships (roles). Roles govern how you feel, behave, not inner attributes.
- Fluid identity, situation-relevant, unstable
- Solid ingroup – outgroup border (you do not easily become ingroup member, nor does ingroup dissolve easily. People might behave very differently towards outgroup members)
How can the in-group out-group distinction impact relationships?
In independent cultures, individuals are separated from the social environment so new relationships form and old ones dissolve without a large impact on self-identity. The opposite is true for interdependent cultures
What did research find about the relationship between brain activation and self-concept?
Chinese and Western participants thought about how well certain traits characterized themselves and their mother. For Chinese, there was activation in the same brain regions for both tasks in mPFC-> representations not that distinct. For Westerners, there were different regions of brain activation, so different representations for themselves and for their mothers. More activation in mPFC when thinking about themselves, but same patterns of activation in mPFC for Chinese.
How does socioeconomic status influence independence/interdependence?
On average, people from higher socioeconomic backgrounds have more independent selves than those from poorer backgrounds. Periods of economic growth tend to be linked to growing rates of independence, while recessions are linked with increasing interdependence.
Research looking at motivation supports this. What did they find?
First generation students (working-class) and continuing generation students (middle-class) were compared on ability to solve anagrams. First gen students solved more anagrams and so were more motivated after interdependent messages. Continuing generation students were more motivated after independent messages
How is independence and interdependence characterized?
These categories are not discrete, each individual varies in the degree of their independence/interdependence. It can be seen as a continuum, and each culture has variety in their view of self.
How does gender impact self-concept?
Men and women were found to be similar in many areas but women scored higher on relatedness, which is attention to others’ feelings and concerns
Self-consistency
the extent to which someone acts the same across situations
How does self-consistency differ for independent vs interdependent cultures?
Independent cultures value consistency across situations more than interdependent cultures
When college students from Japan and US completed the 20 statements test in different contexts what did they find?
- US: responses were, on average, far more positive than the Japanese ones and they looked quite similar across the different contexts.
- Japan: responses varied depending on the situations, being way less self-critical when alone. Lower positive self-view on average
- Could be that internal consistency is related to likability, well-being, and social skills but not in Korea.
Cognitive dissonance
the distressing feeling we have when we observe ourselves behaving inconsistently, or against our own sense of self-consistency. We can remove this by:
- Changing our behavior: change our behavior in a way that is more consistent.
- Dissonance reduction: change our attitudes so we no longer appear to be so inconsistent
How do dissonance reduction tendencies differ for Canadians compared to Japanese?
- CDs were rated on desirability, participants were told they could not have the most desirable one, and had to take 5th/6th choice home. The CDs were then evaluated again
- Canadians showed clear rationalization, so the CD that was chosen was rated higher and not chosen was rated lower
- Japanese did not ensure consistent decisions, but other studies found that they showed rationalization when making decisions for others
How was self-consistency distinguished between peer-consistency in research?
People from Poland and the US were asked to imagine how they would respond to a request by marketing representative from Coca-Cola. They were asked to imagine that they had always complied with the request (self-consistency) or that their classmates had complied with similar requests. In the US they were more likely to comply following self-consistency information, while in Poland they were more likely to comply after peer-consistency information.
How does consistency differ within and across situations?
While Westerners show more self-consistency across situations, East Asians show consistency within situations
Subjective self-awareness
Independent people are more often in a state of subjective awareness. This is a state of mind in which a person considers the self from the inside out, with the perspective of the subject interacting with the world, having little awareness of the self as an individual
Objective self-awareness
Interdependent people are more often in a state of mind in which a person considers the self from the outside in with the perspective of how he or she appears to others and is being evaluated
How was creativity influenced by subjective/objective self-awareness?
Hong Kong and American students completed a creativity test and were given high scores and low scores. It was made known that 1 person had seen their scores and participants had to evaluate their own creativity level. For America, self-evaluations were unaffected by which score was seen by someone else while for Hong Kong, they evaluated themselves to be less creative when the low score was seen by someone than when the high score was seen. Interdependent people tend to evaluate themselves based on what they think others think of them while independent people based their self-evaluations on subjective standards
How can mirrors affect self-evaluation?
When asked to evaluate themselves on actual-ideal self-discrepancies while being in front of a mirror or not. Americans were more self-critical in front of a mirror than without a mirror present while Japanese were unaffected by the mirror. Independent people are put in a state of objective self-awareness they become more self-critical, which does not change for interdependent people as they are already in this state.
What is the explanation for this experiment?
In subjective self-awareness, we consider our self as an acting agent so we have more 1st person memory, high self-esteem, not accurate in predicting behaviour.
In objective self-awareness, consider the self as an object, more 3rd person memory, more self-critical and accurate in predicting behaviour.
Seeing self in memory, forces a switch in me so there is a bigger gap between the ideal and actual self (switch from I to me modus)
Implicit theory
a theory that represents a set of beliefs we take for granted, usually without engaging in much active hypothesis testing.
What are the different implicit theories about the nature of the self?
- incremental theory of self which is that self-concept can or is expected to change, that abilities and traits are malleable and can be improved. Interdependent cultures endorse these more and blame difficulties on their efforts and strategies
- entity theory of self is that aspects of the self are resistant to change, abilities and traits are fixed, with innate features of the self. Independent cultures are more likely to endorse entity theories and blame any difficulties they face on their ability and traits
What are the implications of the implicit theories of self?
Self-concept plays a role in the self, self-consistency and self-awareness. Implicit theories play a role in beliefs related to studying, most Chinese said that intelligence is based on effort while Americans said that intelligence is innate. There is also a difference in reaction to failure vs success and attributions.
Five-factor model
model of personality that assumes there are 5 underlying core traits (OCEAN):
- Openness to experience: one’s creativity and curiosity about the world.
- Conscientiousness: how responsible, dependable, and self-disciplined a person is.
- Extraversion: how outgoing, social, or dominant a person is.
- Agreeableness: how warm, pleasant and considerate someone’s temperament is.
- Neuroticism: one’s emotional instability and unpredictability.
What are the limitations to the Big Five?
- some cross-cultural research suggests that core traits are highly similar to the Big Five, specific cultures could have other factors
- most studies use WEIRD samples which is problematic
How does everyone have similar desires? How does this differ?
Everyone wants to improve the quality of our life but how we get access to these things and the things we find motivating is influenced by cultural environments like what we believe will improve our quality of life
Self-enhancement
The motivation to view yourself positively
Self-esteem
The positivity of your overall evaluation of yourself