Week 1: What is culture? Flashcards
How did Edward Burnett Taylor define culture?
Complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom and other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society. So culture seen as many values, and not something which is innate, something which people share
How did Hofstede define culture?
Collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group of people from another
How did Heine define culture?
Any kind of information that is acquired from other member’s of one’s species through social learning capable of affecting an individual’s behaviours. Particular group of people living within a shared context and exposed to same cultural information
How did Mesoudi define culture?
Socially transmitted information
Culture as an iceberg
Focus on beneath the iceberg like knowledge, social values, beliefs and norms, not only the observable behaviour like artifacts, behaviour, habits and traditions, institutions. Latent processes can drive observable behaviour
What is not culture?
Not only cultural values, also the physical environment and our actions. Not the same as nation, but can be variations in culture within the nation. Not homogenous and invariant within a group. Culture is not stable over time (survival can involve less tolerant and accepting of different ideas, while self-expression is the opposite, can be traditional which is the value of family while the other side is secular). Can be some change, but not radical and build upon previous culture
What is the difference between general psychology and cultural psychology?
General: psychological processes are invariant and universal, differences are superficial and reflect noise, mind is independent from culture (mind is seen as a computer), goal is to understand how the mind is independent of content and context
Cultural: psychological processes are shaped by culture, differences are real and affect deep structure, mind intertwined with culture, goal is to understand how the mind is interdependent with context and content
What is the figure line task?
- square with a line, given two tasks: either reproduce it with the same length, or change the relative length of the line in the square
- East Asians: found the absolute task more challenging, Americans: found the relative task more challenging (more activation attentional control areas)
- moralistic: think of the world as a whole and how all elements are related to each other, at university more likely to take elements apart
- shows difference in analytic vs holistic reasoning
Muller-Lyer illusion
- American undergraduates are more susceptible to it
- Less Western, industrialized individuals are less likely to be susceptible-> due to carpented angles, so not trained to have this 3D perspective
What are the culture specifics?
Even though universally most languages have the same structure, incest seen as a taboo, culturally specific is that languages can be used differently and not use nouns for example, but can be variation in incest taboo.
What are the levels of universality?
Non-universal: Cognitive tool not found in all cultures (e.g., abacus)
Existential universal: Cognitive tool found in all cultures that serves different function(s) (e.g., intrinsic motivation in the face of success or failure) Goes down for those in US with failure but goes up in Asia
Functional universal: Cognitive tool found in all cultures that serves the same function(s) but is used to different degrees in different cultures (e.g., costly punishment)
Accessibility universal: Cognitive tool found in all cultures that serves the same function(s) and is accessible to the same degree (e.g., social facilitation)
Why study cultural variation?
- use mostly WEIRD sample so very narrow segment, so the evidence base is heavily biased-> important to study how the majority world looks like
-To understand differences in today’s multicultural societies: in a globalized world it is important not to be culture-blind. When people adopt a multicultural approach and attend to cultural differences, people of different cultural groups get along better and feel more engaged, and how similar we are
How to study cultural variation?
- what could be the explanatory variable between culture and behaviour? Could do so by adding cultural values in questionnaires, kind of mediation approach. If cultural values explain culture then -> unpackaged culture
What are cultural values?
“Preferences for one state of affairs over another” that distinguish countries (rather than individuals) from each other.Hofstede came up with 6 dimensions which are value profiles of different countries: individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty/avoidance, masculinity/femininity, long-term/short-term, indulgence/restraint. Gelfland: cultural dimension of tightness-looseness
Individualism vs collectivism
Individualism stands for a society in which the ties between individuals are loose: a person is expected to look after himself or herself and his or her immediate family only. Collectivism stands for a society in which people from birth onwards are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups, which continue to protect them throughout their lifetime in exchange for unquestioning loyalty.
What is tightness vs looseness?
The tolerance of deviant behaviours and severity of punishment to norm violators. Tight cultures have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior, whereas loose cultures have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior. Tightness correlates with some interesting ecological facts: population density, access to safe water, food deprivation, that is, conditions that fostered the development of rules. It also has some societal correlates: retention of death penalty, police presence per capita, demonstration attendance. Psychological correlates: cautiousness, dutifulness, high need for structure.
How can cultural values be perceived?
- heterogeniety between but also within cultures, see cultural values/dimensions as a continuum rather than exclusive categories
- none of the two ends is better than the other but one end may be more functionally or historically prevalent in a given culture than the other end. A key to understanding cultural variation but also a limitation
What are the COSI concerns?
Causation: how do I design my study & what conclusions can I draw?
Operationalization: how do I measure my variables & how do I construct my material?
Sampling: which cultures should I study?
Interpretation: what do my data tell me?
Appear as separate decisions but one has implications for the other and need to be considered as a whole
Sampling
Sampling of cultural groups and participants within these groups. Such as testing for universality and testing for cultural variance
How to test for universality?
- randomly select as many cultural contexts as possible (ideal but not pragmatic and many studies use convenience sampling)
- select two maximally different cultural contexts in geography, language, philosophy (if no difference strong evidence for universality, but do not know what variable caused the difference)
What is the minimal difference approach?
Match two cultural contexts in as many ways as possible so that the only difference left is the cultural value of interest. If collectivism explains the differences between the groups there is some initial evidence that culture shapes interpersonal relations. But the evidence is not definite as we did not manipulate the culture, so we compare university students in EIRD contexts so generalization is limited
What is the evaluation of randomly selecting as many cultural contexts as possible?
Ideal but often not the pragmatic option
How to test for cultural variation?
- randomly select as many different cultural contexts as possible
- minimal difference approach
How to test for universality?
- randomly select as many as possible
- test 2 maximally different cultural contexts
How can you make groups equivalent?
- construct equivalence (similarity of construct across cultures)
- methodological equivalence (equality in familiarity with stimulus material and response procedure)
- linguistic equivalence (translation accuracy, retention of connotations)
How is happiness different across culture?
North Americans: Derive happiness through personal achievements and maximize positive affect experiences
East Asians: Derive happiness from interpersonal connectedness and balance experiences of positive and negative affect
So cannot always just take minimal difference between groups, as the meanings could differ
Why is linguistic equivalence a problem?
Some words are untranslatable like boketto which is a Buddhist tradition (crowded cities could create need to shut down) Solution: back-translation, bilingual investigator/collaborators, avoid short/vague items
What are the types of response bias to have create interpretation-free results?
- moderacy and extremity bias (moderacy is when people tend to choose the middle point of the scale, extremity bias is when people tend to choose the extreme ends of the scale)
- acquiescence bias (tendency to agree with an item, can be more likely with a holistic thinking style in East Asia, as behaviour seen as a response to situation then character)
- reference group effect (everyone has different standards to compare themselves)
When is moderacy and extremity bias common, what are the solutions?
Moderacy: more prevalence in East Asian than European
Extremity: Hispanic & African more likely
Solutions: Avoid scales with a middle response option, e.g., 1-6 (cons: does not address extremity)
Yes/no format (cons: reduced variance) Standardize scores (cons: alters the data, only useful for comparisons of patterns, e.g., anger vs. shame)
Solutions for acquiescence bias?
Use 50% reverse-scored items
Standardize scores (cons: see above) Also: Avoid very general items, specify contexts