Week 3: Acculturation and mental health Flashcards
What is enculturation and acculturation?
Enculturation describes the process of first-culture learning
Acculturation refers to the process of cultural change when you interact with people from another culture (second-culture learning)
Why is it important to study acculturation?
There is more migration, contact and diversity, which is highly politicized. With increased globalization there is increased contact between groups which is not always permanent.
What is migration?
The movement of a person or a group of persons, either across an international border, or within a State. “a population movement, encompassing any kind of movement of people, whatever its length, composition and causes”. It is usually economic migrants, sojourners, refugees, asylum seekers and displaced people.
Why do people migrate?
There are push and pull factors to leave their countries. Push = drive people to leave (like economic, social or political problems). Pull= attracting them to country of destination like job opportunities, higher wages, quality of education, safety etc.
What is an issue with the push-pull model?
It does not provide insight into the social, economic, political processes which leads to spatial wage and opportunity gaps. At odds with real life migration patterns. So migration should be a function of capabilities and aspirations to move to understand migration behaviour.
Indigenous people
When there is no evidence of earlier people. Definition of course quite controversial at times. Often indigenous groups face migrants and are forced to participate in cultural change. They are on their home territories but engaged in intercultural contact with those who migrated to colonize or dominate. Others usually have more political and economic power than themselves, so often referred to as national minorities
What are ethnocultural groups
These are descendants of earlier waves of immigration. Chinese or Indians in Carribean or African-American or Dutch/British in Southern Africa, Australia, New Zealand. Most are now voluntary participants in national life of their contemporary societies. They can be derived from voluntary migrants or involuntary migrants who are in contacts with others voluntarily. They are enculturated and socialized in their culture
What are the definitions of acculturation?
- the cultural and psychological change that results after sustained contact with another culture (Berry)
- reflects ethnocentric idea that one is superior to the other, and that the inferior is changing. made up of savagery, barbarism, civilisation and enlightenment (McGee)
- different cultures result in changes in cultural patterns in both groups (Redfield)
- acculturation is a multilevel, contextually dependent developmental change process resulting in others moving into different cultural environments (Doucerain)
What are the criticisms of acculturation research?
- Confusion in definitions of acculturation, due to being individual & supra-individual process
- Acculturation misunderstood as group level phenomenon involving change
- Individual can acculturate without eliciting any group level change in host culture or culture of origin.
- (Individual-level) research needs corresponding definition of acculturation
Who adjusts better to acculturation?
- cultural distance so the difference between two cultures in their ways of life, much easier when distance is smaller like those who grew up speaking Germanic languages
- cultural fit so the degree to which an individual’s personality is compatible with the dominant cultural values of the host culture
- acculturation strategies: depends on attitudes towards the host culture ad towards the heritage culture which leads to distinct acculturation strategies
What is the process of acculturation?
Contact results in influence, resulting in change. The psychological consequences can be none, unsolvable, or resulting in gradual change like acculturation.
What are the difficulties in studying acculturation?
- Many different reasons for migrating
- Many different groups of acculturating people
- Many different experiences, e.g., depends on personality but also context: host cultural attitudes!
- scholars have different view points and studied from different disciplines
- disagreement about the process of acculturation
What are unidimensional models?
The new culture is linked to rejection of the heritage culture. Assimiliation is the endstate and there is a zero-sum assumption. Biculturalism is only a stop before being fully acculturated
What are bidimensional models?
The relationship with the heritage and mainstream culture are independent cultural orientations. Assumptions: differ in cultural values and attitudes, and can have multiple cultural identities. Separation can become difficult to maintain over generations as isolation and protection is needed. Assimilation is only one of 4 options
When can the bidimensional model be established?
- if measured reliably
- correlate in expected directions with key third variables
- orthogonal (not strongly negatively correlated)
- distinct patterns of correlations with other variables
- the bidimensional model has a broader and more valid framework, even though unidimensional model has parsimony but incomplete and misleading acculturation
What is the difference between sociocultural adaptation and psychological adaptation?
Sociocultural adaptation: doing well in new culture, fitting in or negotiating interactive aspects of life in a new cultural environment
Psychological adaptation: feeling well in new culture, mental health and wellbeing
Cultural fit hypothesis
Fit between personal characteristics and norms in host culture
What is a major difficulty for research?
The lack of clarity on what constitutes adjustment and how it changes over time. Adjustment is the acceptance of the host culture, satisfaction, feelings of acceptance and coping with activities, mood state, culturally appropriate behaviour and skills. Has implicitly incorporated wellbeing and satisfaction. 3 frameworks emerged: clinical perspectives, social learning models, social cognition approaches
What did research find about acculturation and adaptation?
They looked at their acculturation strategies across different lengths of residence and the relationship with the psychological and sociological adaptation. The longer the length of residence, the more integration strategies were used. Substantial relationship between age and how well they adapt. Those with an integration strategy had the best psychological and sociocultural adaptation outcomes, while those with a marginalization strategy had the worst. Youth should be encouraged to retain both
their sense of the heritage culture as well as to establish close ties with the host culture
What is acculturative stress?
Is a reduction in mental health and wellbeing of ethnic minorities occuring during adaptation, can include language issues, perceived cultural incompatibilities and self-consciousness which can affect the mental health and psychosocial functioning. Found to be dependent on cultural distance and can result in negotiation between receiving and heritage cultures.
What is the multidimensional acculturative stress inventory?
Used to assess stress of individuals of Mexican origin living in US including English Competency Pressures, Spanish Language Competency Pressures, Pressure to Acculturate and Pressure Against Acculturation. Stress subscales positively related to depression.
What are biculturals?
Those who have been exposed to and internalized two cultures, involve integration and is the majority of acculturating individuals.
Blending vs frame-switching
Frame switching: shifts between intepretive roots in different cultures in response to cues in the social environment. They take turns in guiding thoughts and feelings, can occur in response to contexts and symbols. The more accessible it is, the more likely it will guide interpretations
What is the evidence for blending?
Both Japanese students went on an exchange to Canada, and Canadian teachers went to Japan for exchange. Found that the longer they are in a culture, the more likely that schema of thoughts and feelings activated in them is associated with the host culture. Self esteem change is more pronounced if there is a melting pot culture (assimilation) than a salad bowl culture (integration/separation). The more exposure there is to North American culture, the higher self-esteem is.
What is the evidence for frame switching?
North-Americans: more likely to attribute behaviour to internal dispositions (‘fundamental attribution error’)
East-Asians: more likely to make external attributions (social context, group)
So East Asian are more likely to conclude that the fish is leading the group rather than being chased by others as the North Americans said.
What was found about the tendencies of those from Hong Kong?
Hong Kong is more Westernized due to English colonial influence. When primed with American (Mickey Mouse/cowboy) or Chinese symbols (Chinese dragon/rice farmer). After the Chinese prime then people made more external attributions
What is bicultural identity integration?
It is the individual-level indicator of compatability of cultures. Made up of harmony vs conflict which is the feelings and attitudes towards the cultures and includes the degree of tension or clash vs the compatibility between the two cultures.
Blendedness is the organization and structure of cultural orientations. Includes the degree of dissociation vs overlap between the cultural orientations. High BII associated with higher frame switching and associated with more positive outcomes like self-esteem and wellbeing.
What was found about the prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses?
- Psychopathology present in all studied societies (people suffer all over the world)
- diagnostic differences: differences in what qualifies as mental psychopathology? (do diagnostic practices reflect particular cultural views? (compare China to Chile)
- Differences in expression? eg. is low anxiety in Ankara compensated by higher depression? And the other way around in Athens?
How can culture impact psychopathology?
- each culture provides a symptom pool of recognized and discussed symptoms that leads to people to express their inner conflicts in a familiar language
- cultures differ in the prevalence and the degree to which symptoms are part of mental illnesses (like passivity and non-confrontation in SE Asia, so do not always have means to express frustration resulting in uncontrolled anger and unresolved tensions)
- cultures differ in how they are perceived (stigma) and dealt with (therapy)
How can schizophrenia symptoms differ across cultures?
- existential universal with some variance in modes of expression
- fare better in less developed societies a) more fatalistic attitude and less primary sense of control b) possession by spirits more common c) more integrated in society so stronger sense of community
- In India, the family helps the patient more, less blamed and more social support received
How can culture impact depression?
In China, more likely to somatize (experience symptoms in bodies) vs psychologization (experiencing symptoms in minds) in the West. Due to social stigma/costs with having a psychological disease in Chinese contexts. There is less focus on internal/emotional events as relevant in Chinese vs Western clients.