Week 5 - Sexism and Discrimination Flashcards

1
Q

Power

A

The capacity to determine the outcomes of one’s own as well as of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Structural Power

A

Shapes how society operates, and determines which groups of people have (or lack) access to resources, education, autonomy, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dyadic Power

A

The capacity to choose intimate relationships and partners and to control the interactions and decisions in the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which type of power do men and women have?

A

Men have structural power, while women sometimes have dyadic power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sex Ratio Theory

A

The ratio of men and women in a given environment influences the dyadic power the sexes hold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do dyadic power and intersectionality relate in women?

A

Women’s ability to have their own dyadic power depend on ethnicity, age, income, and education level (Wingood and Diclemente, 2000).
Lower status and vulnerable women are at risk when men outnumber them (Samal, 2016).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ways to Exert Power (Pratto and Walker, 2004):

A
  1. Force
  2. Resource Control
  3. Cultural Ideologies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Force

A

Capacity to inflict physical and/or psychological harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Resource Control

A

Controlling the creation and distribution of essential and desirable goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cultural Ideologies

A

Sets of beliefs and assumptions about groups that explain and justify unequal social hierarchies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Cultural Ideologies

A

Androcentrism: Defines men and their experiences as universal.
Ethnocentrism: Tendency to view one’s own experience as universal.
Heterocentrism: Assumption that hetersexuality is the norm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Five Global Inequities Covid-19 has Highlighted

A
  1. Access to healthcare
  2. Access to green space
  3. Access to the internet
  4. Ability to work remotely
  5. Accessibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do stereotypes legitimize power held by men and ethic dominants?

A

People tend to justify and normalize their power, while privilege is not acknowledged.
Described as “ambitious” instead of “controlling” or “greedy”.
Exempts them from obligations.
(Pratto and Pitpitan, 2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Double Jeopardy Hypothesis

A

Individuals who belong to two or more subordinate groups will experience more discrimination that those who only belong to one subordinate group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intersectional Invisibility Hypothesis

A

Experiences of people with multiple subordinate identities are sometimes disregarded, while experiences of those with dominant identities are seen as the cultural norm, or prototype.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ambivalent Sexism

A

Characterizes the relations of women and men across time and cultures (Glick and Fiske, 2001).
Two types: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hostile Sexism

A

Portrays women as inferior to men, justifying men’s dominance. Antagonistic and derogatory beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Benevolent Sexism

A

“Positive” beliefs characterizing women are pure, and in need of protection. Patronizing behaviour, usually unrecognized as gender bias.

19
Q

What are some misperceptions of benevolent sexism?

A

Women are less likely to protest or discuss this sexism due to perceived warmth.
Men who endorse benevolent sexism are less likely to endorse gender inequality. (Hopkins-Doyle, 2018)

20
Q

How is benevolent sexism harmful?

A

Creates a pacifying effect on women, suppressing their motivations to fight back to sexism.
Less sympathy for female survivors of abuse.
Perpetuation of rape culture.

21
Q

Sexual Objectification

A

Reduces women or girls to “objects”, subjecting them to abuse, and reduced them to their sexual attributes.

22
Q

Self-Objectification

A

Internalizing and fixating on a perspective of oneself dominated by looks, treating oneself as a sexual object.

23
Q

When do women engage in higher levels of self-objectification?

A

When exposed to higher levels of benevolent sexist stereotypes.

24
Q

Objectification Theory Model

A
  1. Cultural Climate of Sexual Objectification
  2. Internalized Objectification
  3. Psychological Consequences
  4. Mental Health Risks
25
Hostile Attitudes
Resentment towards men who are viewed as arrogant, power-hungry, juvenile and sexually predatory.
26
Benevolent Attitudes
Positive attitudes about men's roles as protectors and providers for women.
27
Ambivalent Attitudes about Men
People hold ambivalent attitudes about men that mirror their ambivalent attitudes towards women. Two types: Hostile and Benevolent attitudes.
28
Social Dominance Theory (SDO)
The extent to which people believe social groups should be equal vs hierarchical. Positive associations between SDOs and racism, sexism and homophobia. ex. White men hold more positions of power than other groups.
29
What do those who highly believe in SDO believe?
That inequality is right and fair.
30
In which types of groups are higher believers of SDO found?
Dominant groups. Those in occupations that protect the interests of high-status groups.
31
System Justification Theory
When people defend the current socio political state even when its disadvantageous to them, as uncertainty can threaten security. Subordinate group members support more favourable stereotypes about dominant groups than their own. (Jost, 2005)
32
Gender Discrimination
Unjust treatment based solely on sex, sexual orientation or gender identity. Can be in overt or subtle forms.
33
Microaggressions
Everyday insults and humiliation directed towards those in subordinate groups.
34
Confronting Prejudice Response Model
In order for people to confront discrimination, there are two obstacles they must go through first: Attributional ambiguity and personal-group discrimination discrepancy.
35
Attributional Ambiguity
Difficulty people have in attributing negative behaviour to discrimination when other possible explanations are present.
36
Personal-Group Discrimination Discrepancy
Tendency for members of groups to perceive that discrimination occurs more towards their group than to them personally.
37
How to be an Ally🏳️‍🌈
Publicly support and promote the rights of marginalized group members despite not belonging to that group.
38
What are some outcomes with different types of responses to sexism?
When a seixts statement is followed by continued conversation, the statement is seen as appropriate and shared across participants. When is sexist statement is followed by a pause, disrupting convo flow, it's seen as an issue showing sexism is not shared among participants. (Koudenburg, 2020)
39
What are some consequences for women for resisting gender discrimination?
Women who confront sexism in a hostile or accusatory tone are seen as "cold" and are less liked by men. (Becker, 2011) (Dodd, 2001) Might be shifting with time though.
40
Collective Action
Behaviors enacted on behalf of a group with the goal of improving conditions in the group.
41
What are some factors that must be present before taking collective action?
- Recognition that a subordinate group is marginalized - Anger on behalf of group
42
Affirmative Action
Combating discrimination by increasing opportunities for protected groups.
43
What are some barriers to affirmative actions?
- Meritocracy - Resistance from dominant groups - Prevalence of modern sexism - Perception of decreased competence or how deserving they are for beneficiaries