Week 5 - positive and negative valence Flashcards
positive valence leads us to
approach
negative valence leads to
avoidance
negativity bias
negative events are more powerful and differentiated
positivity/Pollyanna effect
we tend to use positive words more frequent and tend to focus more on the positive, we look for it in our lives
negativity bias and biology
Negative experiences (right hemisphere of the brain)
• Short-term to long-term memory: remember faster and better
• Memory narrowing
Positive experiences (left hemisphere of the brain)
• Short-term to long-term memory takes more time
• Memory broadening
why do we have the negativity bias? (3)
Bad is stronger than good
• Negative is more powerful than positive
• Negative attracts more attention than positive
Explanation: evolutionary
• Bad is stronger than good, because bad calls for change, and this leads to evolutionary improvement (Baumeister et al., 2001)
Consequences of not attending to a negative event are worse
negativity bias and attention
Automaticity tendency to devote more attention to unpleasant information than to pleasant information
Important to pay attention to negative things to avoid danger for example
Attention is drawn to negative information
negative contrast effect
The greater the magnitude of reward, the faster a rat will run to get the reward
If the reward is reduced, rats run slower
• Even slower than rats that started with a smaller reward
The rats have a greater sensitivity to loss than to gain
negative bias and personal relationships
How do you make a relationship last?
• To maintain relationships good interactions should outnumber bad interactions by 5:1
Negative experiences are more crucial for the sustainability of a relationship
positive-negative asymmetry
negative words and characteristics are more powerful / weigh more heavily
negative emotions are more distinct
in case of gain we are risk
averse
in case of loss we are risk
seeking
prospect theory: loss aversion
More distress from negative events than happiness from the positive equivalent
Negative is more distinct
Pollyanna effect (7)
o “It is a belief, that people are more likely to perceive and remember positive things about other people or things than negative ones” (Boucher & Osgood, 1969)
Positive events are much more common
Positive words are much more common than negative words
o Accentuate the positive
Think positive -> creativity, productivity, performance
Positive psychology
o Positivity in English
Positive words strongly outnumber negative words
In our stories and writings we tend toward prosocial communication
See slides
o Positive words dominate on the internet
Positive emotions predominate on the internet
Positive emotions increase communication and strengthen social links
o Positivity in verbal expressions is default: prosocial, forward-thinking
o Positivity is learned: social factors make positivity the most desirable
o Positivity is the social norm
Politeness (saving face)
Euphemisms, political correctness
Avoiding taboo words
Pollyanna effect and negativity bias: two sides of the same coin?
Positivity = norm
• Positive events are more common
Negativity deviates strongly = adaption, change
• Negative events are more differentiated
Rozin, Berman & Rozyman (2010)
- Are the following things reflected in language?
o Positive events are more common
o Negative potency
o Negative differentiation
results Rozin, Berman & Rozyman (2010)
o Part 1: positive words
Positive words are unmarked and are used more often with reversed than negative words
Reversed polarity positive words more frequently have a negative valence than reversed polarity negative words have a positive valence
Positive words are often used for the entire category
In set expressions, the positive word often comes first
In all languages positive dominates negative
o Part 2: negative words
More words to describe negative events than positive events
discussion Rozin, Berman & Rozyman (2010)
o Confirmation of hypotheses
o Positive bias for adjectives: frequency of occurrence and privileging positive adjectives in syntactic and semantic frames
o Negative bias for adjectives: lexicalisation of certain nouns identifying negative situations
o Linguistic efficiency
Positive words more frequent because positive events are more frequent
Negative events less frequent but more significant
limitations Rozin, Berman & Rozyman (2010)
o Random selection of adjectives o Random selection of nouns o Complex research questions o Cumbersome operationalisation o Based on English o Only one participant per language
four positive biases in English
o Positive words are unmarked and are used more often with reversed polarity than negative words
Marked = not default, distinctive feature
Negated = negative form
For example: happy/unhappy instead of sad/unsad
o Negated positive adjectives tend to have a negative valence, whereas negated negative adjectives tend to be neutral in valence
For example: unhappy is negative, while unsad is neutral
o Positive words are often used for the entire positive-negative dimension
Positive words define dimensions
o In set expressions, the positive word often comes first
For example: good and bad
one negative bias in English
o Negative bias: more different words to describe negative events
Some negative states are lexicalized but corresponding positive opposites are not
For example: there is no opposite of murderer
evolutionary explanation
positive is the norm, negative events are rare
o We need to be prepared to adapt and change
positive asymmetry (4)
Positive words are unmarked and are used more often with reversed polarity than negative words
Reversed polarity positive words more frequently have a negative valence than reversed polarity negative words have a positive valence
Positive words are often used for the entire category
In set expressions, the positive word often comes first
negative asymmetry
more words to describe negative events than positive events