Week 4 Flashcards
what is critical appraisal?
- appraises research for its strengths, limitations, and value for practice
what is the first step in the critical appraisal of QNR
- determining match between the clinical question and research design
ex. should it be QL or QN
the critical appraisal process for QN focuses on 3 broad questions:
- are the results of the study valid (validity)
- what are the results? (reliability)
- will the results help me in caring for my pts ? (applicability)
what is study bias (2)
- anything that distorts study findings in a systematic way arising from the methodology of the study
- something consistently occurring that could distort the outcomes & compromise the validity of the findings
ex. instrumentation that isnt valid or reliable, or confounding or extraneous variables
what is internal validity (3)
- anything that happens within the study that confounds our understanding of the relationship between the IV and DV
- what is the strength of the evidence that the IV rather than extraneous, confounding variables , or the instruments used caused the outcome
- the extent to which it is possible to make inference that the IV truly caused/influenced the DV
what is external validity (2)
- what is the strength of evidence that observed relationships are generalizable across people, settings, and time?
- being able ton generalize findings to population outside of the study
what is study validity
- refers to whether the study results can be believed (internal validity) and whether the results can be generalized to other settings/pt populations (external validity)
what is instrument validity (2)
- refers to whether the study measurements are measuring what they are supposed to be measuring
- can serve as a threat to internal study validity
what is study reliability (2)
- refers to the repeatability of the study
- if the study were repeated under the same circumstances, would the results be the same?
what is instrument reliability
- refers to the consistency of the instruments
- will the instruments yield the same results under the same conditions?
what can we ask to assess internal validity? (2)
- did the IV truly influence the DV?
- what competing explanation could there be for the results of the study?
what can help control internal validity (2)
- be aware of confounding variables
- instrument tools
what are 8 threats to internal validity
- history
- mortality
- selection
- maturation
- knowledge of who receives the intervention
- recall bias
- loss to follow up
- contamination
describe the history threat to internal validity
- other events co-occurring with casual factor that could also affect outcomes
- any other event that may occur along the same time as the IV is being measured in realation to its impact on the outcome
describe the mortality threat to internal validity
- differential loss of participants from different groups
- drop out of study
= attrition bias