Week 3: Models of Word Recognition and Production Flashcards

1
Q

Problem we experience with word

A

there are memory limitations: time and capacity
that needs us to “predict” what are the likely words that would appear.
Known as Parallel Activation of lexical competitors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors:

Spivey and Dale (2004)

A

Mouse movement:
choose between 2 objects that have similar starting pronounce.

Observation:
majority of the moue’s trajectory time is spent in intermediate regions between the 2 objects, partially consistent with multiple lexical representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

multiple lexical representations in the mind

A

mind is entertaining a continuously evolving set of potential candidates that are activated in parallel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors: Cross-model Priming: ambiguous speech

Marslen-Wilson (1987)

A

priming studies using ambiguous speech stimuli:
Partial information about spoken words (eg: Capt)
facilitated timed lexical decisions to visually presented words associated in meaning (eg. ship and guard)

Implies that meanings of both words are accessed during the perception of the initial ambiguous sequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors: Cross-model Priming: frequency

Marslen-Wilson (1990)

A

Frequency of lexical target affects the amount of priming.

Cross-modal priming effects are larger for higher frequency competitors than for lower frequency competitors (DOG vs DOCK).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition

McClelland, Elman (1986)

A
  • interactive activation connectionist network model
  • is a neural network
  • 3 lvls:
    3) Words/lexical (highest lvl)
    2) Phonemes
    1) Features
  • has interconnected processing unit called nodes connecting between the 3 lvls
    direction of travel:
    1) bottom up
    2) top down: lateral inhibitory connections
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:

nodes description

A
node in all lvls have:
- resting level and
- threshold for activation
(based on frequency of word occurrence) 
- word recognition is a process of building activation for a set of lexical candidates in parallel over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:

node connections

A

an active node can:
- raise the level of activation of consistent nodes (excitatiory connections)
- lower the level of activation of inconsistent nodes (inhibitory connections)
of dif lvl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:

Lateral inhibitory connections @ lexical lvl

A
  • top down connections
  • enable selection of the candidate that best matches the evidence accumulating from input
  • allows selection between competitors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:

selection between competitors process

A

Parallel activation causes lexical ‘candidates’ to compete during word recognition.

nodes compete via lateral inhibitory mechanisms

“winner” is the lexical node with the strongest activation after excitatory and inhibitory inputs are accounted for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly