Week 3: Models of Word Recognition and Production Flashcards
Problem we experience with word
there are memory limitations: time and capacity
that needs us to “predict” what are the likely words that would appear.
Known as Parallel Activation of lexical competitors.
Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors:
Spivey and Dale (2004)
Mouse movement:
choose between 2 objects that have similar starting pronounce.
Observation:
majority of the moue’s trajectory time is spent in intermediate regions between the 2 objects, partially consistent with multiple lexical representations
multiple lexical representations in the mind
mind is entertaining a continuously evolving set of potential candidates that are activated in parallel
Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors: Cross-model Priming: ambiguous speech
Marslen-Wilson (1987)
priming studies using ambiguous speech stimuli:
Partial information about spoken words (eg: Capt)
facilitated timed lexical decisions to visually presented words associated in meaning (eg. ship and guard)
Implies that meanings of both words are accessed during the perception of the initial ambiguous sequence
Evidence for Parallel activation of lexical competitors: Cross-model Priming: frequency
Marslen-Wilson (1990)
Frequency of lexical target affects the amount of priming.
Cross-modal priming effects are larger for higher frequency competitors than for lower frequency competitors (DOG vs DOCK).
TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition
McClelland, Elman (1986)
- interactive activation connectionist network model
- is a neural network
- 3 lvls:
3) Words/lexical (highest lvl)
2) Phonemes
1) Features - has interconnected processing unit called nodes connecting between the 3 lvls
direction of travel:
1) bottom up
2) top down: lateral inhibitory connections
TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:
nodes description
node in all lvls have: - resting level and - threshold for activation (based on frequency of word occurrence) - word recognition is a process of building activation for a set of lexical candidates in parallel over time.
TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:
node connections
an active node can:
- raise the level of activation of consistent nodes (excitatiory connections)
- lower the level of activation of inconsistent nodes (inhibitory connections)
of dif lvl
TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:
Lateral inhibitory connections @ lexical lvl
- top down connections
- enable selection of the candidate that best matches the evidence accumulating from input
- allows selection between competitors
TRACE Model of Spoken Word Recognition:
selection between competitors process
Parallel activation causes lexical ‘candidates’ to compete during word recognition.
nodes compete via lateral inhibitory mechanisms
“winner” is the lexical node with the strongest activation after excitatory and inhibitory inputs are accounted for