Week 23- Group-level health psychology interventions Flashcards
Pain
A sign that something is wrong or has been damaged
Not just biological and physical, it is how we interpret pain which is affected by how we feel about it such as emotions, what we think it means, and what we do about it
What can pain be affected by?
‒ Emotional state, e.g. state or trait anxiety, negative mood
‒ Schemas and our beliefs about pain and how we cope with pain
‒ Worry about intensity of pain, how long it might last, origin or consequences of the pain
Early conceptualisations of pain
- Pain viewed from a biomedical perspective:
- Caused by tissue damage
- SEVERITY DEPENDS ON EXTENT OF TISSUE DAMAGE
Evaluation of early conceptualisations of pain
- Pain experienced not always related to observable tissue damage (e.g. chronic back pain; phantom limb pain)
Pain is clearly beneficial – warns us of danger/damage
Pain sensation can continue even in the absence of physical damage
The brain takes into account not only info from pain receptors but info from elsewhere
May cause brain to keep sending signals of pain even if physical damage is no longer there
Types of pain: Acute pain
‒ Necessary to protect us from damage or infection
‒ Pain for short amount of time/ painkiller or treatment used
Types of pain: Chronic (persistent) pain
‒ Pain lasting 3 months or longer – any original injury may have healed, but pain pathways have become altered meaning that pain is felt in the absence of injury
‒ Psychological consequences such as anxiety, depression and hopelessness
Types of pain: Biopsychosocial model of pain
Physiological factors: injury, disease, general health
Psychological factors: anxiety, stress, fear-avoidance, pain beliefs, somatisation, coping, learned helplessness
Environmental factors: SES, work/home environment, healthcare services, family and social/cultural attitudes and norms
Social factors: social context, responses of others, support, dependence, restricted social activity
FAM in chronic (persistent) pain (Crombez et al 2012)
- Identifies risk factors for chronic pain:
‒ avoidant coping strategies
‒ fear of movement/(re)injury
‒ catastrophizing
‒ expecting high level of pain
‒ low perceptions of control over pain - Supports model, e.g. fear-avoidance predicted who would suffer back-pain episode in the year post-baseline (Linton et al. 2000)
Why are group intervention needed?
Group interventions or no more or less effective than individual-level interventions
Systematic review of smoking cessation found group interventions no more effective than intensive individual interventions (Stead et al 2017
Why are group intervention needed? Evaluation
‒ May allow participants to feel additional social support – shared understanding of their condition or situation
‒ More cost-effective for NHS
‒ Group interventions still allow for individual goals to be set
Social support: Learning from others
self-disclosure from other group members on how to address a specific problem; self-disclosure of experiences
Social support: Trust and understanding
a shared “safe” space creates a feeling of acceptance
Social support: Self-disclosure
allows for modelling and learning from others
Social support: Relationships with group members
friendships developed in the group may continue after therapy has finished
Pain Management Programmes (PMPs)
- Intensive (complex) interventions for patients with chronic (persistent) pain
- Theory-based (CBT) – FAM is a CBT model
- Cover a range of topics/strategies, depending on the theory:
- Medication education
- Mindfulness
- Exercise
- Goal-setting