Week 2- Research Methods in Psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define research

A

Systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is empirical research obtained?

A

Obtained from direct or indirect observations and measurement to test research questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does research evidence allow us to do?

A

Obtain ‘evidence based’ answers to many questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Empirical research advantages

A
  • Improved ability to think critically about research- better informed consumer research
  • Keep abreast of developments in your field of expertise (professional development). Critical to all health sciences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discuss psychology as a science

A
  • Scientific study of behaviour and the biological and cognitive processes that underlie behaviour
  • Scientific approach: assumes that events are governed by some lawful order and seeks to identify laws, principles or consistencies governing behaviour
  • Human behaviour: systematic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List criticisms to the scientific approach

A
  • Do we need to use a scientific approach? Alternatives?
  • Logic/reason alone
  • Casual observation
    • not systematic
    • common sense
    • can be vague, ambiguous, contradictory
    • someone told me
  • Bias- when using common sense or logic only
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List reasons for using the scientific approach

A
  • Precision, clarity
    • must specify exactly what you mean
  • Tries to avoid error
    • scientists trained to be sceptical about their own and others’ ideas and conclusions
    • demands objective data, through documentation before accepting ideas
    • must find reasons for conflicting findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the goals of the scientific approach?

A
  • Description- summarising responses/data in a way that makes the events and relationship between them easily understandable
  • Prediction- using outcome of research to identify what us likely to occur in the future
  • Explanation/understanding- identifying the casual factors that led to the results
  • Application- apply to the ‘real world’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define theory

A

A systematic way of organising and explaining observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define hypothesis

A

A tentative statement about the way two (or more) variables interact/impact each other. Can be directly tested scientifically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the scientific method

A
  • Investigator manipulates a variable under controlled conditions and observes whether changes occur in a second variable (DV)
  • Powerful procedure- allows detection of cause-effect relationship between variables
  • What are these controlled conditions?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline basic concepts in empirical research

A
  • Before conducting research, important methodological steps must be considered
  • Specifically, what and how we are going to test our hypothesis- variables, operationalising variables
  • Who is the target population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the 6 steps in an experiment

A
  1. Framing the hypothesis- predicting relationships between two or more variables
  2. Operationalising variables- converting abstract concepts into testable form
  3. Developing a standardised procedure- setting up an experiment and control conditions; attending to demand characteristics and researcher bias
  4. Selecting and assigning participants- randomly assigning participants to different conditions
  5. Applying statistical techniques to the data- describing the data and determining the likelihood that differences between the conditions reflect causality or chance
  6. Drawing conclusions- evaluating whether or not the data supports the hypothesis; suggesting future studies to address limitations and new questions raised by the study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define categorical variable

A

Can take on fixed volumes (e.g. eye colour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define independent variable (IV)

A

Condition or event that an experimenter varies/manipulates in order to observe its impact on another variable (DV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define dependent variable (DV)

A
  • Variable thought to be affected by the manipulation of the IV
  • Measured, counted or recorded by the investigator
  • The ‘outcome’
  • The results, the ‘data’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operationalise variables using the mindfulness experiment example

A
  • Mindfulness meditation- use same program with instructions for each participant
  • Control condition- have all control participants do the same thing e.g. read same restful book
  • Anxiety (DV)
    • measured using same anxiety scale
    • reliable- consistent response pattern to similar items
    • valid- actually measuring anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define population

A
  • The entire group of people that a researcher is interested in. Depends on research question
  • Contacting and ‘measuring’ entire population is not practical
  • Researchers typically study samples (population subsets)
  • Make inferences about the entire population based on the sample
  • Sample must be representative of population being tested
19
Q

How do we test the hypothesis?

A
  • 2 groups of participants with similar characteristics
    • experimental group receives some special treatment in regard to the IV
    • Control group does not receive the special treatment in regard to the IV
  • Aim- isolate effects of IV on DV from the effects of other variables
  • IV= X axis, DV= Y axis
20
Q

Define extraneous variables, giving mindful meditation experiment examples

A
  • Variables other than IV that seem likely to influence the DV
  • Age, gender, meditation experience
21
Q

Define confounding variables, giving mindful meditation experiment examples

A
  • Occurs when 2 variables are linked together in a way that makes it difficult to sort out their specific effect on the DV
  • E.g. if more anxious adults were assigned to the mindful meditation group or to the control group, drawing conclusions about the program’s effectiveness would be difficult
22
Q

Give a solution for confounding variables, including why it is effective

A
  • Random assignment of participants to levels of IV
    • Reduces likelihood of a confounding variable
    • Each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any group or condition in the study
    • Unlikely that all highly anxious people would end up in the same group
23
Q

Outline the three descriptive statistics

A
  • Mean- sum of all values, divided by number of values
  • Median- middle; half of the values are smaller, half are larger
  • Mode- most frequently occurring score in distribution
24
Q

Define standard deviation

A
  • How the scores vary from each other and the mean
  • An index of the amount of variability in the data set. Larger SD indicates more variability
25
Q

Outline inferential statistics

A
  • Used to interpret data and draw conclusions
  • Indicate whether or not the hypothesis was supported
  • Involves determining the probability that the obtained result is due to chance
  • When the probability (p) is very low (p < .05) then statistical significance exists
26
Q

Outline advantage of experimental research (through control)

A
  • Standardised procedure
  • Random assignment
  • Study has internal validity relationship between IV and DV has been isolated
  • Permits conclusions about cause and effect relationships
27
Q

Outline disadvantages of experimental research

A
  • Conducted in controlled lab settings, therefore results might not generalise to the ‘real world’
  • May have poor external validity- does the research context resemble the situation found in the real world? If not, external validity could be poor
28
Q

Define and discuss generalisability

A
  • Generalisability requires:
    • internal and external validity
    • drawing conclusions from data analysis
  • Generalisability- can the research results (from the sample) be applied to the entire population of interest
29
Q

List and define (4) types of research methods

A
  • Descriptive designs- concerned with describing behaviour
  • Correlational designs- concerned with predicting behaviour
  • Experimental designs- concerned with establishing the causes of behaviour
30
Q

State the purpose of descriptive research and give examples of methods

A
  • Seeks to describe behaviour rather than manipulate variables
  • Methods of descriptive research include case studies, naturalistic observation, survey research
31
Q

Outline advantages of case studies

A
  • In depth study of the behaviour of one person or a small group
  • Exploring complex behaviours
  • Testing new ideas
  • Investigate rare disorders
32
Q

Outline disadvantages of case studies

A
  • Small sample size
  • Susceptibility to researcher bias
  • Problem of an atypical case
33
Q

Define naturalistic observation

A
  • In depth study of a phenomenon in its natural setting
34
Q

Outline advantages and disadvantages of naturalistic observations

A
  • Advantages:
    • good generalisability
  • Disadvantages:
    • observations per se can alter behaviour
    • cannot establish cause of a behaviour
35
Q

Outline surveys

A
  • Asks questions of large numbers of persons to gain information on attitudes and behaviour
  • Approaches- questionnaires, interviews
  • Variables cannot be manipulated, but can find associations (correlations)
36
Q

Outline disadvantages of surveys

A
  • Sampling issues
  • People may not respond accurately
37
Q

Define correlational research

A
  • Used when variables cannot be manipulated
  • A correlation exists when 2 variables are associated with one another
  • Correlation coefficient (r) indicates the strength and direction of the association
38
Q

Outline positively correlated values

A
  • Values vary in the same direction
  • High values of one variable are associated with high values of the other variable
39
Q

Outline negatively correlated variables

A
  • Values vary in opposite direction
  • High values of one variable are associated with low values of the other variable
40
Q

List possible R values and what they indicate

A
  • Range from -1.00 to +1.00
  • Variables can be strongly correlated without being casually related. Correlation does not equal causation
  • Values indicate strength, signs indicate direction
    • -1.00 = strong negative correlation
    • -1.50 = moderate negative correlation
    • 0.00 = no correlation
    • +0.50 = moderate positive correlation
    • +1.00 = strong positive correlation
41
Q

When are experimental and descriptive methods used?

A
  • To answer different psychological questions
  • Appropriate method will depend on the research question being addressed
42
Q

Outline ethics according to the Code of Ethics developed by the Australian Psychological Society

A
  • Informed consent
  • Maintain participant welfare
  • Voluntary participation
  • Ensure confidentiality
  • Avoid deception
  • Fair and humane treatment of animals and people
  • Gain appropriate ethics approval
43
Q

Outline 7 questions used to critically evaluate research

A
  • Does the theoretical framework make sense?
  • Is the sample adequate and appropriate?
  • Are the measures and procedures adequate?
  • Is the data conclusive?
  • Are the broader conclusions warranted?
  • Does the study say anything meaningful?
  • Is the study ethical?