Week 11 - Morality& Social Domain Flashcards

1
Q

What is Morality?

A
  • Judgments of right and wrong pertaining to others’ welfare, rights, and fairness
  • How should people behave towards one another?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Morality before 2 yo

A

Before the age of 2-years, children are concerned with the well-being of others
Children are more likely to help someone who:
• Is in need
• Has been harmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Piaget’s Theory of Morality

A
Stage theory of moral development
• Developed by:
• Watching children play games
• Interviewing children about different types of transgressions
3 stages: 
1. premoral development
2. heteronomous stage
3. autonomous stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Premoral development

A

up to 4 yrs

- no explicit awareness of rules, no use of moral principles or notions of justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Heternomous stage

A

4-10 yrs

  • rules are seen as unchanging and external, like physical laws
  • judgements of culpability are based on the act’s consequences rather than intention
  • little sense of what punishment is appropriate for what transgression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Autonomous stage

A

10-11 yrs

  • rules are seen as human agreement that can be changed if both parties agree
  • judgement of culpability based partly on intention
  • punishment should be appropriate to the level of transgression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In Piaget’s experiments on morality why did children younger than 6 answer differently than adults?

A

Value outcomes over intentions

• Task demands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Study: Selective Helping in Young Children

A

(1) Neutral condition
• Actor comments on belt and necklace in tray
• Actor comments on remaining sheets of paper or the other ball of clay
(2) Harm condition
• At end of each presentation, actor said “I’m going to
take/tear/break this now”
(3) Help condition
• Recipient accidentally damages her own property and the actor helps her
Test trial
• Actor and neutral person each played an individual color
matching game
• Put their three balls in the slots, and then simultaneously reach for a ball in the middle and hold that pose
• Child then gives the ball to one of the two people
• After they gave the ball, they were given a second ball so that they could help the other person, too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study: Selective Helping in Young Children 2nd study

A

Same design, but replace harm and help conditions with:
(1) Intended-but-failed to harm
• The actor says “I’m going to break/tear this but then can’t do it
(2) Accidental harm
• Actor admired the clay bird but then accidentally ruined it giving it back
–> children more likely to help person with good intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Three distinct domains of social knowledge

A

1) Moral
2) Social Convention
3) Personal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social Knowledge: Moral

A
  • Concerned with welfare and fairness
  • Universal
  • Impersonal
  • Determined by criteria other than agreement or consensus
  • Moral wrongness is an intrinsic feature of the act
  • Causes harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social Knowledge: Social Convention

A
  • Shared norms that smooth social interactions
  • Change as a function of context
  • Agreed upon
  • Alterable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social Knowledge: Personal

A
  • Control over body, privacy, choice of friends or activities
  • Autonomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When are children aware of rules?

A
  • Piaget argued that children younger than 4-years-of-age did not understand rules or recognize when people had broken rules
  • Research suggest that children start to be aware of adult standards/rules during their second year
  • For example, Judy Dunn conducted an observational study of family interactions
  • 14-month-olds reactions to transgressions by a sibling indicate that they understand that rule is being broken
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do parents act when conventions are violated?

A
  • Tell the child to stop with no explanation
  • Make statements about disorder
  • Make rule statements
  • Respond with disgust and annoyance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do parents act when moral transgressions are made?

A
  • Tell the child why the act was wrong
  • Ask the child to take the other’s perspective
  • Respond with anger
17
Q

How do children view moral transgressions differently?

A

Compared to conventional transgressions, both 3- and 4-year-olds rated moral transgressions as:
• More generalizable
• More independent of rules and authority
• Less alterable
• 4-year-olds rated moral transgressions as more deserving of punishment

18
Q

Prosocial Behaviour

A

voluntary behavior intended to benefit others

19
Q

What is needed to produce prosocial behavior?

A
  • Recognize a negative state
  • Identify the cause of the negative state
  • Be motivated to act
20
Q

3 types of negative states

A

Instrumental
Material
Emotional

21
Q

Varieties of Prosocial Behaviour

A
Helping
- understanding goal directed behaviour
Sharing
- giving away a desirable resource
Comforting
- engage in affective perspective taking
22
Q

helping, sharing, and comforting

A
  • produced in response to a negative state
  • emerge at different ages
  • not necessarily correlate
  • show unique patterns of variability
23
Q

Prosocial behaviour development variability

A
  • Unique ages of onset
  • Unique developmental trajectories and
    uncorrelated patterns of production
  • Distinct patterns of production in atypical
    development (i.e., autism)
24
Q

Nature of Prosocial Development

A

Natural Tendency View:
• innate inclination to act on behalf of others
• socialization second

Social-Interactional View:
• innate inclination to interact
• socialization firs

25
Q

Prosocial Behavior Development in the Cultural

Context

A
Cultural model of autonomy: 
Western, urban, middle class with autonomy as 
developmental organizer (urban Montreal, WEIRD kids) 
Cultural model of relatedness: 
Traditional village context with relatedness as 
developmental organizer (rural Mexico) 

In both cultural contexts:
• Prosocial behaviours were responsive to need
• Varieties of prosocial behaviour were produced at
similar relative frequencies
• helping > comforting > sharing
However, children in Mexico produced fewer prosocial
behaviours in general

In both cultural contexts:
• Children displayed similar types and frequencies of
need
• Children were similarly responsive to need
• Varieties of prosocial behaviour patterned similarly
across the two contexts