W7 Fri GWAS for complex trait Flashcards
What do we mean by heritable
- Heritability is the proportion of phenotypic variation that is due to genetic variation in a population.
- Broad sense heritability: H2 = VG /VP
- Non-genetic variation is attributed to the environment: VG + VE = VP
Way to study heritibility
Need to decompose VP (which is what we observe) into VE and VG
* Comparing monozygotic twins raised together and apart: VG = 0
* Comparing monozygotic to dizygotic twins raised together: VE = 0
* Correlation between twin pairs in general
* Correlation between parents and offspring
Broad-sense and narrow-sense heritability
genetic component can be broken down further: VG = Va + V d + V i
* Va = additive variance
* Vd = dominant variance
* Vi = epistatic variance
* Narrow sense heritability: h^2 = Va /V p
(aka: slope of the linear regression line)
* When we talk about the genetic contribution to traits, this is often what we mean
Method for mapping heritability
Linkage mapping
* Use a segregating pedigree to construct a linkage map
Candidate gene association mapping
* Test one or a handful of pre-selected loci for association with trait in cases and controls
Genome-wide association study (GWAS)
* Test cases and controls for association with many markers.
disadvantage of linkage
- Linkage mapping requires extensive pedigrees to reach significance.
- If trait has complex architecture, it will be hard to identify causal variants.
- Identifies large blocks (many MB wide).
- Suited to monogenic disorders.
Disadvantage of associating mapping
- Candidate gene mapping relies on a priori assumptions about trait aetiology and causality.
- Meaningless if loci misidentified.
- Much contributing variation can be missed.
What does the success of GWAS depend on
- Well-differentiated cases and controls drawn from the same population
- Sufficient statistical power (sample size) to detect significant associations
How GWAS is carried out
- It is too expensive to sequence the whole genome of every individual in a GWAS ($1000/person, >500,000 people in current GWAS)
- Use tag SNPs instead:
- tag SNP: a SNP that summarises variation within an LD block
How tag SNPs work
- A set of tag SNPs can be used to build a haplotype, which summarises genetic diversity at a region (thanks to LD)
- If your tag SNPs don’t tag what you think they are tagging… all downstream inference will be imprecise
Early GWAS reseaches
- Myocardial infarction (Ozaki et al, 2002), age-related macular degeneration (multiple groups, 2005), both identified a small number of loci with large effects on disease risk.
-These loci could explain a substantial fraction of the h2 estimates
Importance of power in GWAS
- Early GWAS were underpowered to detect most associations.
- The strength of the association between the
trait and the genotype depends on: - Effect size of the variant
- Penetrance of the variant
- Frequency of the variant
- Quality of the case/control separation
- (and others)
- All of these interact in complex ways:
- A rare variant of large effect will not be detected in a GWAS, unless the sample size is very large.
- Nor will a common variant of large effect but low penetrance
Predicting traits with polygenic scores
- GWAS hits can be quite informative even if the underlying biology is unknown.
- Take every single SNP ever associated with a trait and count the number of risk
alleles you see across all of them in an individual - The combination of a PRS and clinical risk estimates could be used in the
clinic to recommend specific interventions for each patient