W7 Fri GWAS for complex trait Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What do we mean by heritable

A
  • Heritability is the proportion of phenotypic variation that is due to genetic variation in a population.
  • Broad sense heritability: H2 = VG /VP
  • Non-genetic variation is attributed to the environment: VG + VE = VP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Way to study heritibility

A

Need to decompose VP (which is what we observe) into VE and VG
* Comparing monozygotic twins raised together and apart: VG = 0
* Comparing monozygotic to dizygotic twins raised together: VE = 0
* Correlation between twin pairs in general
* Correlation between parents and offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Broad-sense and narrow-sense heritability

A

genetic component can be broken down further: VG = Va + V d + V i
* Va = additive variance
* Vd = dominant variance
* Vi = epistatic variance
* Narrow sense heritability: h^2 = Va /V p
(aka: slope of the linear regression line)
* When we talk about the genetic contribution to traits, this is often what we mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method for mapping heritability

A

Linkage mapping
* Use a segregating pedigree to construct a linkage map
Candidate gene association mapping
* Test one or a handful of pre-selected loci for association with trait in cases and controls
Genome-wide association study (GWAS)
* Test cases and controls for association with many markers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

disadvantage of linkage

A
  • Linkage mapping requires extensive pedigrees to reach significance.
  • If trait has complex architecture, it will be hard to identify causal variants.
  • Identifies large blocks (many MB wide).
  • Suited to monogenic disorders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disadvantage of associating mapping

A
  • Candidate gene mapping relies on a priori assumptions about trait aetiology and causality.
  • Meaningless if loci misidentified.
  • Much contributing variation can be missed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the success of GWAS depend on

A
  • Well-differentiated cases and controls drawn from the same population
  • Sufficient statistical power (sample size) to detect significant associations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How GWAS is carried out

A
  • It is too expensive to sequence the whole genome of every individual in a GWAS ($1000/person, >500,000 people in current GWAS)
  • Use tag SNPs instead:
  • tag SNP: a SNP that summarises variation within an LD block
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How tag SNPs work

A
  • A set of tag SNPs can be used to build a haplotype, which summarises genetic diversity at a region (thanks to LD)
  • If your tag SNPs don’t tag what you think they are tagging… all downstream inference will be imprecise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Early GWAS reseaches

A
  • Myocardial infarction (Ozaki et al, 2002), age-related macular degeneration (multiple groups, 2005), both identified a small number of loci with large effects on disease risk.
    -These loci could explain a substantial fraction of the h2 estimates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Importance of power in GWAS

A
  • Early GWAS were underpowered to detect most associations.
  • The strength of the association between the
    trait and the genotype depends on:
  • Effect size of the variant
  • Penetrance of the variant
  • Frequency of the variant
  • Quality of the case/control separation
  • (and others)
  • All of these interact in complex ways:
  • A rare variant of large effect will not be detected in a GWAS, unless the sample size is very large.
  • Nor will a common variant of large effect but low penetrance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Predicting traits with polygenic scores

A
  • GWAS hits can be quite informative even if the underlying biology is unknown.
  • Take every single SNP ever associated with a trait and count the number of risk
    alleles you see across all of them in an individual
  • The combination of a PRS and clinical risk estimates could be used in the
    clinic to recommend specific interventions for each patient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly