W2L2 Thu Reverse genetics - Model for human genetic Flashcards
Way to investigate humans genetic
-GWAS- indentification gene associated with phenotype
-Monozygotic twin: epigenome reset in early gestation, but each twin accumulate their own Epigenetic changes
-inheritance pattern (no longer use due to being outdated)
-Human steam cell- genetic manipulation easy, individualized diseas studies and treatment screening
Limitations of humans as genetic models
Functional in vivo gene manipulations impossible
Classical inheritance studies slow
“Controls” fairly limited
Invasive phenotypic analysis difficult
What is used for genetic disease modeling
-reverse genetic to understand the final phenotype
Reverse Genetics: Animal models and technical approaches
Animal models:
Evolutionary distance, genetic conservation
Relevance, suitability
Reverse Genetics:
Gene knockdown vs. knockout
Morpholino technology - controls
CRISPR mutagenesis
Genetic compensation
Conditional and inducible gene expression
Key consideration non human model
Evolutionary and genetic conservation (relevance)
Relevance vs. technical suitability of animal models
Genomic vs. proteomic conservation
Cell vs. organ vs. integrated function vs. higher order behaviour
Evolutionary conservation - Vertebrates (phylogenetic and phylogenetic tree)
Phylogenetics - Evolutionary relationship between species
Morphological, molecular (nucleotide, amino acids)
Phylogenetic tree reveals accurate evolutionary distances (time) and branching points of common ancestors.
Genetic model organism
-Non-human species used to study fundamental, highly conserved processes
-Used to research human health and disease aspects
-Relevant conservation of cellular, tissue or organ function or process
-Relevant underlying genetic conservation
Why use genetic model organism
Ease and low cost of husbandry
Short generation cycle
Genetic manipulation amenability
High number of offspring
What is relevance and suitability
Relevance: Is the process conserved in humans?
1. Evolutionary / genetic distance - phylogeny & conservation
2. Complexity (cellular vs. organ or behaviour)
Suitability:
What is the most suitable model (e.g. with genetic tools)
Mouse: Mammalian model Genomic vs. proteomic conservation
-Closest genetic model, i.e. highest relevance to human genetics
-40% nucleotide alignment
-May lead to no or functionally irrelevant AA changes
80% of mouse gene have single ORTHOLOGUE
one-to-one equivalent of gene with conserved expression (time and location) and function
-<1% of mouse genes have no detectable orthologue
-Conservation: Nucleotide < Amino acid < functional protein
-Same principle that explains why mutation size cannot predict phenotype (although there are trends).
Many similar cell, organ and body organ function
Zebrafish
-Large set of genetic tools as a vertebrate, and whilst evolutionary distance is greated from human, genetic conservation remains high.
-Many basic vertebrate specific conserved cell types / organs
1. 70% of human genes have orthologues
2. Whole genome duplication:
* Potential for identifying multiple roles of genes temporal (one in development, one in adult) or spatial (in two different cell types or organs)
* Loss of gene often viable in contrast to mammals for example
Reverse Genetics - Gene knockdown Transient and variable efficiancy (MO)
Morpholino (MO) technology / Antisense oligonucleotide
1. 25 bp synthetic oligomer complementary to bind mRNA of target gene.
2. Transcription process for other occurs unperturbed, MO acts at mRNA level.
3. Two types:
A. Translational MO
B. Splice MO
EXP: Way of using genetic model
-find volunteer with rare genetic problem
-accept and sequence the genome
-informatics analysis of submitted gene (find orthologs of model organism) and prioritized some gene
-test on drosophila and zebra fish, potential discovery of new gene and genotyping expansion
Morpholino gene knockdown efficiency:what does it depend on?
Efficiency depends on numbers of MOs vs number of mRNA molecules. With every cell division, MOs are roughly halved and knockdown often becomes inefficient by the end of the rapid developmental period in the first 3 / 4 days.
Translational MO and efficientcy detection
Binds start site or just upstream and prevents translation by steric hindrance. Thus, mRNA formed, but no protein.
Protein loss can be tested using antibodies against the protein either in immunostaining or Western blots.