Visual Imagery I: Internal and External Perception Flashcards
Mental imagery?
Re-creating the sensory world in the absence of physical stimuli
Visual imagery?
Seeing in the absence of a visual stimulus
Do you think in words or images?
Wundt: Images are one of three basic elements of consciousness (with sensations & emotions)
Aristotle: “It is impossible to think without an image”
- Words have the power of specific meaning
- Images have the power of holistic meaning, power of metaphor
Imageless thought debate?
Galton (1883) observed people who struggled with visual imagery, but thinking was not affected
Behaviourism discounted this question, but questions were revisited in cognitive revolution
Alan Paivio’swork? Picture superiority and Conceptual peg hypothesis
“picture superiority”:
Memory for images of objects stronger than memory for names of objects
- Concrete nouns remembered better than abstract nouns
Conceptual peg hypothesis (will be on exam): images have many places for other stimuli to “hang” onto
Advancements in Experimental Design?
- Infer mental processes, including imagery
- Mental chronometry: measuring time to complete cognitive tasks
Imagery vs. Perception?
Do they work in the same way? - Same mechanisms?
Perception is spatial, sizes/distances vary. Is imagery spatial, too?
Mental Scanning - Kosslyn’sinitial mental scanning study?
- Memorize an image
- Imagine it, focusing part A
- Mentally scan across the image, look for B
- Respond if B is in the image or not
Logic: if imagery is spatial, distance between A and B should predict time to find B
Result: people took longer to “find” parts further away from focus
Possible confound:
- People get distracted by things between A and B
- Time doesn’t reflect spatial distance but number of things in between
Mental Scanning - Are the mental images really coded spatially?
Pylyshyn(1973) argued spatial representation is an epiphenomenon
Epiphenomenon:
Imagery is mostly propositional
The debate between depictive vs. descriptive imagery continues
Imagery and Perception Similarities?
Level of detail increases as distance decreases
Image a car from a far versus up close
Level of Detail Study (Kosslyn, 1975)?
Participants told to imagine two objects
IV:
a) Target object next to a larger object
E.g.: rabbit next to elephant
b) Target object next to a smaller object
E.g.: rabbit next to fly
Once imagined, participants asked about details of the target object
E.g.: “Does the rabbit have whiskers?”
DV: response time
Results: participants took longer to evaluate details when target was relatively small
Findings suggest that detail is limited by size in visual imagery, as in visual perception
Interaction between Perception and Imagery -
Perky (1910) showed participants a blank screen, and asked them to imagine objects
At the same time, very dim image of the object appeared on the screen?
Results
- Participants reported features of their mental image that matched projected image
- Imagination was implicitly biased by perception
Interaction between Perception and Imagery - Martha Farah
Participants asked to visualize an H or a T (only one)
Then two squares flashed on screen (either H or T)
- Non-simultaneous flash (serial presentation)
Task: which square (1stor 2nd) contained letter?
Results showed more accurate target detection when imagery matched target
Suggests perception & imagery shared mechanism
Perception and Imagery facilitate each other