Violence Assmt and Intervention Flashcards
Control Vector Analysis
To gauge POC’s behavior, ask the following 3 questions:
1) How much desperation POC is showing to establish control?
2) What actions have they taken before to achieve a sense of control?
3) Given their history, what actions might they take in the future to achieve a sense of control?
What gives the richest possible understanding about why a POC behaved a certain way at a certain time?
What they did or said, in what sequence, in regard to what stimulus (basically CIrCon factors)
A single aggregated narrative assembled from 3 different types of specific timelines
Metachronology
What are the 3 different timelines in a metachronology
1) In each incident of concern, internal to itself
2) In the entire relationship between the victim and POC
3) Throughout the whole life of the POC
7 Steps in a cognitive interview:
1) Greeting the witness and personalizing interview/establishing rapport
2) Explaining the aims of the interview
3) Initiating free report
4) Direct questioning
5) Varied and extensive retrieval
6) Summary
7) Closure
When interviewing collateral sources:
First ask a series of questions to qualify and quantify information already known which you believe they have knowledge about. If they’re reluctant, finding out if reasons are legal or personal can relieve their concern and allow them to provide info.
What are Weingarten rights?
Employee rights to request representatives.
What are the four retrieval instructions of the enhanced cognitive interview?
Change the perspective
Change the order
Context reinstatement
Report everything
Four types of questions that limit recall ability:
1) Forced-choice
2) Multiple
3) Leading - steer towards “correct” answer
4) Misleading - steer towards “incorrect” answer
Retrieval procedures:
Change the order - may help to fill in holes/gaps since typical recall is scripted
Change the perspective - Report from other witnesses’ perspectives. Make it clear that the interview should not make assumptions or guesses. Only report what they actually saw and heard
Is it okay to ask leading questions when clarifying inconsistencies?
Yes, but consider interviewees are suggestible and info may be of little value
Three emotional and behavioral factors during interviews:
1) Saving-Face - POC may not be purposely withholding info but may be embarrassed or feel guilty so provide contradicting info. Gently point out the inconsistency to make them feel it’s okay.
2) Death of a Story - Like DABDA - in B, attempts to mask reality of situation; in 2nd D, demonstrates remorse; in 2nd A, usually reached if first four don’t work
3) Hope Barrier - They may fear repercussions. Address their fear which can be helpful to admitting the issue.
Direct Accusation method is useful when:
There is a lot of evidence clearly showing a crime’s occurred. POC usually denies so interviewer provides rationalizations for their behavior.
Kinesic Interview’s 2 stages:
1) Interview to detect deception
2) Interrogation to get a confession, more emphasis on verbal communication
Active attempt to change another person’s attitudes, beliefs, or emotions associated with some issue, person, concept, or object
Persuasion
What is the Tickle-Degnen and Rosenthal’s three-part construct of rapport?
Having a third person in the room who isn’t the primary interviewer did not diminish the quality or quantity of info learned, rapport can be maintained
Four relationships between victim and POC
1) Direct
2) Indirect
3) Only imagined
4) None
Aquino and Lamertz described two types of perpetrators:
1) Domineering - demonstrate superiority
2) Reactive - use coercion or aggression
The two types of perpetrators described by Aquino and Lamertz encounter three types of victims:
1) Submissive - insecure, anxious - may not retaliate if attacked
2) Provocative - aggressive, abrasive - more likely to interpret situations as threatening - don’t intend harm but need to protect selves affects their workplace etiquette
3) Non-provoking - don’t exhibit off-putting behaviors but may be seen as vulnerable or threatening
What is victim precipitation?
When the victim intentionally or by mistake participates in the events that led to the POC’s aggressive behaviors.
What does research show about power and aggression and how does it related to IPV?
People who perceive themselves to have little power may be more aggressive than others. If perceive little power in relationship, behave more aggressively.
What does a perception of injustice have to do with workplace?
Perception of high workplace injustice linked to workplace aggression
Link between supervisory control over supervisees’ work
the more control the supervisor has over employee performance, the higher the sense of injustice
Research findings among cognitive ability, agency, communion, and victimization
Cognitive ability positively correlated with victimization. Those with higher agency experienced increased victimization but high communion traits mitigated victimization.
Perceived injustice motivates people to make someone responsible for the injury
Fairness theory
US Department of Labor’s 2 types of unlawful workplace harassment:
1) quid pro quo
2) Hostile work environment
Three motivations for participating in workplace romances
1) Love motive
2) Work related - advancement
3) Ego motive - lust, sexual gratification
Most common pairings of motive in workplace…think “FUC” all “PM” ….what is the possible result of each one’s dissolution?
1) Fling - both ego motives - far less likely to end in issues cuz based in excitement for both
2) Utilitarian - one ego other work-related motive - could result in quid pro quo bc no deep sense of empathy and partner is sexual object
3) Companionate - both love motives - empathy is real so less likely to end in quid pro quo
4) Passionate - both love and ego motives - empathy is real so less likely to end in quid pro quo
5) Mutual - both work-related motives - could result in quid pro quo bc no deep sense of empathy and partner is sexual object
Three scenarios in which victim is caught in workplace IPV
1) OTJ Harassment - appearing at workplace, calling them repeatedly
2) OTJ Sabotage - making them late, disabling cars, depriving of sleep
3) OTJ Stalking - lurking around workplace, waiting along commuting routes
List the psychological concepts of victims…think FIND-RC
1) Fantasy Victim
2) Ineffectual Victim
3) Nice Person Victim
4) Domineering Victim
5) Romantically Involved Victim
6) Criminal Victim