Venovo Venous Stent Flashcards
Purpose of the Venovo™ VERNACULAR Clinical Study
To assess the safety and effectiveness of the Venovo™ Venous Stent for the treatment of
symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction
what is the Venovo™ VERNACULAR Clinical Study?
Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Study of the Treatment of
Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease – an Assessment for Effectiveness and Safety
Venovo™ VERNACULAR Clinical Study primary patency for venovo
88.6% (133/150)
Medtronic Abre is only compatitable with the __, while BD Venovo is compatable with the __,__,__.
- 9F
- 8, 9, 10F
Medtronics Abre’s design is _____.
straight ends, non flared
BD Venovo design is _____.
3 mm flared ends for wall apposition
Venovo™ demonstrated higher pull force, interpreted as ___________, compared to the
Medtronic Abre™ Stent in simulated use testing
migration resistance
What was the difference in migration difference bwteen the Venovo and the Abre?
12.6% difference
key takeaways of venovo stent vs. Abre stent
- Offers 11 more stent sizes including 160 mm lengths
- Offers flared ends designed to prevent stent migration
- Offers clinical data out to 36-months
Zilver Vena stent design
- co- axil delievery system
- pin & pull system
The Ziler vena stent has ____ ends.
straight
the zilver vena stent has ___ size, while venovo has ___ size.
- 14
- 42
The Venovo™ Venous Stent demonstrated more than ___ higher compression resistance than the zilver
2X
Venovo™ demonstrated ___ higher pull force, interpreted as _________, compared to the
Zilver® Vena™ Stent in simulated use testing.*
- 2X
- migration resistance
key takeaways of venovo stent vs. zilver stent
- Offers 28 more stent sizes including lengths up to 160
mm - Offers flared ends designed for wall apposition
- Offers higher compression resistance