validity and reliability Flashcards
Define reliability
The extent to which a test produces consistent findings every time is done
How can reliability be assessed
- test retest
- inter observer reliability
Explain 2 methods of testing reliability
Test retest - compares results from the same study from two separate occasions, results are correlated and A correlation coefficient over 0.8 is seen as reliable
Inter rater reliability- When two observers carry out the same observation separately and then correlate their results a correlation coefficient over 0.8 is seen as reliable
How can reliability be improved
- Have highly trained observers or interviewer
- Clear standardised procedure
- Structured interviews and close question questionnaires
- use an established questionnaire or procedure
Define validity
- Whether a measure actually measures what it claims to be measuring
What are the two types of validity
- Internal validity (Are the results obtained solely affected by changes in the independent variable)
- External validity (Whether the data can be generalised to other situations outside of the research environment) 
What factors influence internal validity
- Social desirability bias
- Demand characteristics - Investigator effects
- How’s standardised the procedure is
How can internal validity be improved
- Single and double blinds prevent investigator effects and demand characteristics
- A clear standardised procedure controls variables
- Counterbalancing reduces order effects
- Random allocation
- Peer review 
What are the types of external validity
Ecological validity- The extent to which findings can be generalised to other settings than the research setting
Mundane realism – the extent to which the tasks or activities are similar to what would be experienced in the real world
Population validity – the extent to which the sample is representative of the target population
Temporal validity – the extent to which findings can be generalised over time
How can external validity be improved
- Replication of the study using different variations across time, different samples and different settings
How can validity be assessed
- face validity- One or more judges assess whether the test or measuring tool appears to be appropriate
- Concurrent validity – compares a new measurement tool with a validated old one, Correlates the measurements from them both if the correlation coefficient is 0.8 or higher than the measuring tool is seen as valid