Validity and intercoder reliability (3.3) + (4.1) Flashcards

1
Q

Validity and Reliability

A

•Variables need to be operationalized (their metrics need to be
defined)
•Are they valid?
- Do they measure what they are supposed to measure?
•Are they reliable?
-Would you get the same value if you remeasured the same thing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of validity

A
  • Face validity
  • Content Validity
  • Construct Validity
  • External Validity (Ecological Validity)
  • Internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Face Validity

A

Does the operationalization superficially seem like it measures the construct of interest?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Content Validity

A

Does your operationalization measure all

aspects/dimensions/contents of a construct?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Construct Validity

A

The extent to which your operationalization is actually measuring the
construct you claim it is measuring.

Homogeneity – does it measure / manipulate only one construct?

Convergent – Does your operational definition correlate strongly with
other measures of the same construct

Divergent – Does your operational definition correlate only weakly
with similar but distinct constructs

Predictive – does your operational definition predict behaviors
associated with the construct?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

External Validity

A

Can the conclusions of the research be generalized beyond the
context of the original research?

  • Dif. participants, time, situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ecological Validity

A

Is the research similar to what naturally occurs in the real world?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Internal Validity

A
  • Methodological mechanics
  • Cause and effect relationships does x really cause y?
  • Is the experiment free of confounds or alternative explanations?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methods for assessing reliability:

A
How similar are the values when you remeasure the same thing?
•Methods for assessing reliability
•Split-half reliability
•Parallel-forms reliability
•Intercoder reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intercoder reliability

A
  • How reliable are your measurements?
  • Resolve them using a predetermined method to deal with disagreements
  • Interobserver reliability for two coders
  • Propor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Split-half reliability

A

Split the items into two subsets
•Does performance on one half correlate strongly with those from the other
half?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parallel Forms Reliability

A

•Create two versions of the same items but in different orders
•Does performance on version A have a strong positive correlation with that
from version B?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly