UNIT #9 - Sentencing & Parole Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Aboriginal overrepresentation

A

The discrepancy between the relatively low proportion of aboriginal people in the general Canadian population and the relatively high proportion of aboriginal people involved in the criminal justice system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Absolute discharge

x2

A

(1) The release of an offender into the community with no conditions put in place
(2) Person is found guilty but will not be convicted and will have no criminal record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Community service

A

A sentence that involves the offender performing a duty in the community, often as a way of paying off a fine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conditional discharge

x3

A

(1) The release Of an offender into the community with conditions put in place
(2) If offender breaches the conditions he could be sanctioned
(3) If probation period is completed successfully, the discharge will become absolute and the individuals criminal record will be clean.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Day parole

A

(1) A form of parole that allows the offender to enter the community for up to one day (E. G., for the purpose of holding down a job)
(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fine

A

A sentence where the offender have to make a monetary payment to the courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Full parole

x5

A

(1) A form of parole that allows the offender to serve the remainder of his sentence under supervision in the community
(2) Before an offender is granted full parole, a thorough assessment is done to predict the likelihood of reoffending.
(3) Consideration is also given to what conditions should be implemented to address the chance of risk.
(4) To be granted full parole, offenders must
usually have been granted (and must have
successfully completed) unescorted temporary
absences and day parole.
(5) The offender is closely supervised while on full parole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fundamental principle of sentencing

A

Belief that sentences should be proportionate to the gravity of the offence and the degree of responsibility of the offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

General deterrence

A

Sentencing in order to reduce the probability that members of the general public will offend in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Imprisonment

A

A sentence served in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Need principle

A

Principle that correctional interventions should target known criminogenic needs (I. E., Factors that relate to reoffending)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parole

A

The release of offenders from prison into the community before their sentence term is complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Parole board of Canada

A

The organization in Canada responsible for making parole decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reparations

A

A sentence where the offender has to make a monetary payment to the victim or the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Responsivity principle

A

Principle that correctional interventions should match the general learning style of offenders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Restitution

A

A sentence where the offender has to make a monetary payment to the victim or the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Restorative justice

A

An approach to dealing with the crime problem that emphasizes repairing the harm caused by crime. Based on the philosophy that when victims, offenders, and community members meet voluntarily to decide how to achieve this, transformation can result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Risk principle

A

Principle that correctional interventions should target offenders who are at high risk to reoffend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sentencing disparity

A

Variations in sentencing severity for similar crimes committed under similar circumstances

20
Q

Sentencing guidelines

A

Guidelines that are intended to reduce the degree of discretion the judges have when handing down sentences

21
Q

Specific deterrence

A

Sentencing in order to reduce the probability that an offender will reoffend in the future

22
Q

Statutory release

x2

A

(1) The release of offenders from prison after they have served two-thirds of their sentence
(2) an assessment is carried out to predict the likelihood of reoffending and consideration is
given as to what conditions should be implemented to address the chance of risk.

23
Q

Supreme Court of Canada

A

Created in 1875, the Supreme Court of Canada consists of eight judges plus the chief justice, who are all appointed by the federal government. The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in Canada, and lower Canadian courts are bound by its rulings. The Supreme Court also provides guidance to the federal government on law-related matters, such as the interpretation of the Canadian constitution

24
Q

Systematic disparity

A

Consistent disagreement among judges about sentencing decisions due to factors such as how lenient judges think sentences should be

25
Q

Temporary absence

x3

A

(1) A form of parole that allows the offender to enter the community on a temporary basis (e.g., For the purpose of attending correctional programs)
(2) usually the first type of release an offender will be granted
(3) can take part in activities such as substance-abuse programs, family violence counselling, and technical training courses.

26
Q

Unsystematic disparity

A

Inconsistent disagreement in a judges sentencing decisions over time when judging the type of offender or crime due to factors such as the judge’s mood

27
Q

Unwarranted sentencing disparity

A

Variations in sentencing severity for similar crimes committed under similar circumstances that result from reliance by the judge on legally irrelevant factors

28
Q

range of options open to a judge in sentencing an offender in Canada

x5

A

(1) fines
(2) conditional discharge
(3) absolute discharge
(4) restitution
(5) community service

29
Q

Purposes of sentencing in criminal
law

x8

A

(1) To separate offenders from
society
(2) To provide reparations for harm done to victims or the community
(3) To assist in rehabilitating offenders
(4) General deterrence
(5) Specific deterrence
(6) To denounce unlawful conduct
(7) to reduce the probability that offenders, and the rest of the community, will violate the law
(8) Fundamental purpose of sentencing is to
contribute to respect for the law and the
maintenance of a just, peaceful, and safe
society by imposing sanctions on
individuals who commit crimes

30
Q

How Appellate/appeal courts
differ from other courts

x3

A

(1) Do not normally conduct trials
(2) Or hear evidence from witnesses
(3) Function is to review decisions rendered by the Superior-level courts

31
Q

Principles to be applied in sentencing and offender

x6

A

(1) Fundamental Principles Of sentencing
(2) A sentence should be adjusted to account for any relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances relating to the offender or the offence.
(3) Sentences should be similar for similar
offenders committing similar offences under similar circumstances.
(4) Where consecutive sentences are imposed, the combined sentence should not be unduly harsh.
(5) And offender should not be deprived of liberty (for example imprisoned) if less restrictive sanctions are appropriate under the circumstances.
(6) If reasonable, sanctions other than imprisonment should be considered for all offenders.

32
Q

range of options open to a judge in sentencing an offender in Canada

x5

A

(1) fines
(2) conditional discharge
(3) absolute discharge
(4) restitution
(5) community service

33
Q

Why is discussion of the death
penalty still relevant in Canada?

x8

A

(1) The Canadian public appears to
support the death penalty under
certain conditions.
(2) In a recent public opinion poll of 1514
Canadians, 63% of respondents supported the reinstatement of the death penalty for murder.
(3) Some of the reasons Canadians give for supporting it are based on potentially faulty logic.
(4) Believe it would serve to act as a deterrent for potential murderers.
(5) The deterrence argument assumes that
offenders think about the punishment before acting, which does not appear to be the case for many offenders.
(6) A very large number of murders are committed in the heat of passion, or under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, with the offenders paying very little attention to the consequences of their crimes.
(7) If the penalty does act as a crime deterrent,
we would expect to see an increase in the
Canadian right since abolition.
(8) The murder rate in Canada has generally
declined since 1975, around the time when the death penalty was abolished.

34
Q

How could sentencing disparity be reduced in Canada?

x7

A

(1) Disparity exists because the law Canada allows judges a great deal of discretion when making sentencing decisions
(2) Starting-point sentences:
Those that courts of appeal have
determined to be appropriate for particular crime categories.
(3) As a way of ensuring fairness the sentences are to be used by trial judges a starting point,
which can be revised (up or down) once the judge takes into account relevant aggravating and
mitigating factors.
(4) Develop sentencing guidelines: Guidelines that are intended to reduce the degree of discretion that judges have when handing down sentences.
(5) Attempt to provide a more consistent, structured way of arriving at sentencing decisions
Thus, Reducing sentencing disparity.
(6) In the United States, for example, sentencing
guidelines exist that Are designed to limit
disparity by imposing restrictions on the
sentences that judges can hand down when
dealing with individuals who have committed similar crimes and have a Similar criminal history.
(7) These guidelines require judges to make
certain decisions unless they have reasons for
the parting from the guidelines.

35
Q

Range of factors influencing
sentencing decisions of judges

x2

A

(1) The offender’s degree of responsibility
- Various aggravating and mitigating factors
- Seriousness of the offence
- The harshness of the sentence
(2) Extra-legal Factors: Factors that have little to
do with the crime
- Gender
- Age
- Race

36
Q

Methods of studying sentencing disparity

x3

A

(1) Laboratory-based simulation studies
(2) Variations in sentencing severity
(3) Examination of official sentencing statistics in
an attempt to uncover variations in judicial
sentencing decisions.

37
Q

Methods of studying sentencing disparity:

Laboratory-based simulation studies

x3

A

(1) Researchers present mock judges,
or real judges, with details of the
case and examine if and how sentencing decisions assigned to those cases by the judges vary.
(2) Details of a given case are typically held constant
(3) So any variation that is found across
judges can presumably be attributed to
a reliance on legally irrelevant factors
(e.g. A judge’s personality, philosophy, training)

38
Q

Three noted principles of effective
correctional intervention and their
relationship to recidivism

x4

A

(1) Need principle
- Correctional intervention should
target known criminogenic needs
- For example, anti-social attitudes, antisocial personality factors, interactions with antisocial
peers, and substance abuse
(2) Risk principle
- Correctional interventions should target offenders who are at high risk to reoffend
- Effective interventions will focus on those offenders who are at high risk of reoffending
- Not only are low-risk offenders unlikely to reoffend, but also their chances of reoffending may actually increase if exposed to an intervention because of the fact that they will be brought to
contact with people who hold anti-social attitudes
(3) Responsibility principle
- correctional intervention should match the general learning style of offenders
- Effective interventions will match the general learning styles and abilities of the offender being targeted as well as more specific factors such as the offender’s personality, gender, ethnicity
- Structured, cognitive-behavioral interventions are likely to be most useful with offenders
(4) Offenders taking part in appropriate programs exhibited a decrease in recidivism, whereas offenders taking part in inappropriate programs
exhibited an increase in recidivism

39
Q

What are the four principles
involved in parole?

x4

A

(1) The conditional release of offenders into a community so they can serve the remainder of their sentences outside an institution.
(2) an attempt to rehabilitate offenders so they can become productive contributors to society.
(3) a high degree of community supervision to ensure the parolee is abiding by certain rules.
(4) a clause that, if the conditions of parole are
not complied with, an offender’s parole can be revoked and he or she can be sent back to prison.

40
Q

common myths about
parole decision making

x5

A

(1) Parole reduces the sentence imposed by the courts.
- does not reduce the sentence imposed by the courts; it affects only the way in
which a sentence will be served. Parole allows offenders to serve their sentences in the community under strict conditions and the supervision of a parole officer. If offenders abide by these conditions, they will remain in the community until their sentence is completed in full, or for life in the case of offenders serving life or indeterminate sentences.
(2) Parole is automatically granted when an inmate becomes eligible for parole consideration..
- is not automatically granted when inmates
become eligible. In fact, the PBC denies full parole to approximately six out of ten offenders at their first parole review date.
(3) Myth #3
The PBC grants parole to offenders who express remorse for the offences they have committed.
- Whether offenders express remorse is only
one of the factors the PBC considers. Of greater importance is whether offenders understand the factors that contributed to their criminal behaviour, the progress they made while incarcerated, and the feasibility of their plans upon release.
(4) Most of the offenders released on
parole are convicted of new crimes.
- Most offenders released on parole successfully complete their sentences without committing new offences or breaching the conditions of their parole.
(5) Victims do not have a role in the parole process, and their views are not taken into account.
- Victims and their families have a significant
role in the parole process. They have the
opportunity to present a statement directly to
the PBC about any concerns they have for their safety or the safety of the community. In addition, victims may remain in contact with the PBC while the offender is under sentence. Moreover, the PBC allows victims, as well as other members of the public, to observe
parole hearings and to request copies of written decisions.

41
Q

Relationship between different types
of community sanctions and effects
on criminal recidivism

x3

A

(1) Based on results from studies
it can be concluded there is very little evidence that community sanctions lead to substantial decreases in recidivism
rates (compared with regular probation)
(2) It was found that scared straight, prison versus
community, more versus less prison, electronic monitoring, & drug testing actually increased Recidivism rates.
(3) Fines and restitution were found to decrease recidivism rate

42
Q

degrees of parole are available to inmates

x4

A

(1) full parole
(2) Statutory release
(3) temporary absence
(4) day parole

43
Q

Discrepancy between public Opinion & the facts about CJ System

x5

A

(1) Discrepancy occurs because
Of an inadequate understanding On the part of the public of crime And how criminal justice system Responds to it
(2) Studies show media Presents biased view of CJ System
(3) Researchers suggest public Does not adequately correct For the unrepresentative range
Of cases they hear about in the Media.
(4) High profile cases of serious Offender’s being treated leniently Particularly persuasive and convince Public offenders get off easy in Canada
(5) Result is the negative feelings And perceptions of leniency Are perpetuated

44
Q

general trends emerge from public opinion surveys regarding the criminal justice system

x4

A

(1) Canadians exhibit the least amount
of confidence in the court, prison,
and parole system.
(2) Think that offenders are treated too leniently.
(3) Do you is that the federal government and courts do not treat criminals harshly enough.
(4) Public consistently underestimates how harshly criminals are treated in reality.

45
Q

relationship between different types of parole and “success” in terms of
revocation for breach of conditions

x5

A

(1) most recent Performance Monitoring Report published by the PBC, federal offenders who are granted parole based on an assessment of their risk of reoffending are more likely to complete their supervision period in the community compared with offenders released as a result of statute-based systems.
(2) offenders who were granted day or full parole were more successful compared to those granted statutory release;however, even in the case of statutory release, the majority of offenders are
successful.
(3) Success rates also seem to be improving for
each group over time, albeit only slightly.
(4) most of the failures experienced by offenders on parole (and statutory release) are due to breach of conditions rather than the commission of new offences.
(5) relatively few offenders go on to commit
additional crimes upon their release.