Unit 5 questions Flashcards
Should compensating balances and restricted cash be disclosed in notes to its FS?
Yes
Cash amounts designated for special uses should be separately presented. For example, cash restricted for bond sinking funds should be separately stated from cash and disclosed in the financial statements. As part of an agreement regarding either an existing loan or the provision of future credit, a borrower may be required to keep an average or minimum deposit with the lender. This compensating balance not only increases the effective rate of interest paid by the borrower but also creates a disclosure issue because the full amount reported in the cash account might not be available to meet general obligations.
Compensating balances that are not legally restricted as to withdrawal as included or exclusded from cash on the BS?
Included. Only legally restricted amounts related to LT arrangements should be classfied separately as noncurrent.
Companies A and B begin with identical account balances, and their revenues and expenses for the year are identical in amount except that Company A has a higher ratio of cash to noncash expenses. If the cash balances of both companies increase as a result of operations (no financing or dividends), the ending cash balance of Company A as compared to that of Company B will be
Lower.
A and B began with identical cash balances, and all revenues and expenses are identical except that A has a higher ratio of cash to noncash expenses. Thus, A must have a lower cash balance at the end of the year because more of A’s expenses required a credit to cash. More of B’s expenses would have been accrued (i.e., credited to liability accounts). This question assumes no financing, no cash dividends, and identical amounts of cash and credit sales for A and B. If A and B had the same amount of revenue but different proportions of cash and credit sales, it would not be possible to determine which had the higher cash balance from the facts given.
The following are held by Smite Co.:
- Cash in checking account $20,000
- Cash in bond sinking fund account 30,000
- Post-dated check from customer dated one month from balance sheet date 250
- Petty cash 200
- Commercial paper (matures in two months) 7,000
- Certificate of deposit (matures in six months 5,000
What amount should be reported as cash and cash equivalents on Smite’s balance sheet?
$27,200
Answer (A) is correct.
Cash consists of (1) coin and currency on hand, (2) demand deposits (checking accounts), (3) time deposits (savings accounts), and (4) near-cash assets (e.g., deposits in transit or commercial paper, also known as negotiable instruments). Thus, the cash in checking and petty cash are included in cash and cash equivalents. Cash that is restricted to use for other than current operations, designated for the acquisition or construction of noncurrent assets, or segregated for the liquidation of long-term debts (e.g., a sinking fund) is noncurrent. Undeposited checks from customers are near-cash items, but they are excluded if they are undepositable (e.g., postdated or unsigned). Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments. Normally, only investments with original maturities of 3 months or less qualify. Hence, the CD is not included. However, commercial paper with an original maturity of two months is a cash equivalent. The balance reported is therefore $27,200 ($20,000 checking + $200 petty cash + $7,000 commercial paper).
Which of the following is an election date for the purpose of determining whether to elect the fair value option (FVO)?
A.The entity enters into a firm commitment to purchase soybeans in 3 months.
B.The accounting treatment of an equity investment changes because the entity must consolidate the investee.
C.The accounting for an equity investment changes because the entity no longer consolidates a subsidiary.
D.The accounting treatment of an equity investment changes because the entity no longer has significant influence.
Answer (C) is correct.
An entity may choose the FVO only on an election date. For example, an election date occurs when the accounting for an equity investment in another entity changes because the investor retains an interest but no longer consolidates a subsidiary or a variable interest entity.
When financial assets and liabilities are measured using the fair value option (FVO), their fair values should be reported
separately from the carrying amounts of similar items measured using other attributes.
Assets and liabilities measured using the FVO are reported in a way that separates their fair values from the carrying amounts of similar items measured using another attribute. To accomplish that purpose, an entity may (1) present the aggregate of fair value and non-fair-value amounts in the same line item in the balance sheet and parenthetically disclose the amount measured at fair value or (2) present two separate line items.
An election date for the FVO includes the date of an event requiring fair value measurement when it occurs but not subsequently (excluding recognition of impairment, e.g., of inventory or long-lived assets). Examples of events requiring either remeasurement at fair value or initial recognition of eligible items and that result in an election date are:
(1) a business combination,
(2) a consolidation or deconsolidation, or
(3) a significant modification of debt. A consolidation requires an initial recognition in the consolidated statements of eligible items on the books of the subsidiary but not measurement of those items at fair value. A business combination involves an initial recognition of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with measurement at fair value. However, an investment in a subsidiary required to be consolidated is not itself an item eligible for the FVO.
The decision to elect the fair value option (FVO)
Is irrevocable until the next election date, if any.
The decision to elect the FVO is final and cannot be revoked unless a new election date occurs. For example, an election date occurs when an entity recognizes an investment in equity securities with readily determinable fair values issued by another entity. A second election date occurs when the accounting changes because the investment later becomes subject to equity-method accounting. An original decision to classify the equity securities as available-for-sale may then be revoked at the second election date by choosing the FVO instead of the equity method.
Dates on which the fair value option (FVO) may be elected include
The date on which financial assets no longer qualify for fair value reporting under a specialized accounting principle.
Election dates include the date of an event that causes financial assets measured at fair value (with unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings because of a specialized accounting principle) no longer to qualify for such accounting treatment. An example is a transfer of assets from a subsidiary within the scope of the guidance on investment companies to an entity within the same consolidated entity that is not subject to that guidance.
Items eligible for the FVO election do not include employers’ and plans’ obligations for:
(1) employee pension benefits,
(2) other postretirement employee benefits,
(3) postemployment benefits,
(4) employee stock option and stock purchase plans, or
(5) other deferred compensation.
The reporting entity may elect the fair value option (FVO) for
Most financial assets and liabilities.
An entity may elect the FVO for most recognized financial assets and liabilities. For example, the FVO may be elected for most held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities.
Election of the fair value option (FVO)
Results in recognition of unrealized gains and losses in earnings of a business entity.
A business measures at fair value the eligible items for which the FVO election was made at a specified election date. The unrealized gains and losses on those items are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
A company leases trucks and properly classifies the leases as capital leases. The leases have a 10-year term, and the lease calculations were done 3 years ago when interest rates were lower. Which of the following is the appropriate accounting treatment, if any, for the application of the fair value option to lease transactions?
A.Recognize the change to fair value accounting with an unrealized loss in the income statement.
B.Leases are not eligible for the fair value option.
C.Recognize the change to fair value accounting with an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income.
D.Recognize the change to fair value accounting with a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings.
Answer (B) is correct.
Generally, the fair value option does not apply to financial assets and liabilities under leases. Therefore, the capital leases in the question are not eligible for the fair value option.
What are the 3 Classifications of debt securities?
Held to Maturity
Trading Security
Available for Sale Security
Beach Co. determined that the decline in the fair value (FV) of an investment was below the amortized cost and permanent in nature. The investment was classified as available-for-sale on Beach’s books. The controller would properly record the decrease in FV by including it in?
Earnings section of the income statement and writing down the cost basis to FV.
The amortized cost basis is used to calculate the amount of any impairment. The amortized cost basis should be distinguished from fair value, which equals the cost basis plus or minus the net unrealized holding gain or loss. If a decline in fair value of an individual available-for-sale security below its amortized cost basis is other than temporary, the amortized cost basis is written down to fair value as a new cost basis. The write-down is deemed to be a realized loss and is included in earnings.
On July 2, Year 4, Wynn, Inc., purchased as a short-term investment a $1 million face-value Kean Co. 8% bond for $910,000 plus accrued interest to yield 10%. The bonds mature on January 1, Year 11, and pay interest annually on January 1. On December 31, Year 4, the bonds had a fair value of $945,000. On February 13, Year 5, Wynn sold the bonds for $920,000. In its December 31, Year 4, balance sheet, what amount should Wynn report for the bond if it is classified as an available-for-sale security?
$945,000
Available-for-sale securities should be measured at fair value in the balance sheet. Thus, the bond should be reported at its fair value of $945,000 to reflect the unrealized holding gain (change in fair value).