Unit 1 - Burden and standard of proof (BSB 11) Flashcards
Legal Burden
A burden of proof, the requirement to
prove an element of your case to a
prescribed standard. Standard varies
between prosecution and defence
Standard of Proof
The degree to which proof must established
by a party bearing a burden of proof.
Standard to discharge legal burden:
a) Where prosecution bears legal
burden =
beyond reasonable
doubt;
Standard to discharge legal burden:
b) Where accused bears legal burden =
balance of probs.
In every case if you have a legal burden to prove a fact in issue you have the evidential
burden of “passing the judge” with the same evidence
(EXCEPT SELF-DEFENCE –LEGAL + EVIDENTIAL BURDEN detach from each other)
If the evidential burden on a particular issue is borne by the prosecution =
it is discharged by the adduction of sufficient evidence to justify as a possibility a finding by the tribunal of fact that the legal burden on the same issue has been discharged, in other words ‘such evidence as, if believed and if left uncontradicted and unexplained, could be accepted by the jury as proof’
Evidential burden is discharged by adduction of sufficient evidence to justify as a possibility a finding by the tribunal of fact that the legal burden on the same issue has been discharged
(i.e.: such evidence as, if believed and if left uncontradicted & unexplained, could be accepted by the jury as proof).
If evidential burden is discharged = tribunal of fact will determine if legal burden discharged; OR
If evidential burden not discharged = will fail on that issue, judge will withdraw issue from the jury.
If the accused bears both the evidential and the legal burden on a particular issue, for example, insanity, the evidential burden is discharged by the adduction of such evidence as might satisfy the jury on the probability of that which the accused is called upon to establis
- If the accused bears the evidential but not the legal burden on a particular issue, for example, self-defence, the evidential burden is discharged by the adduction of such evidence as ‘might leave a jury in reasonable doubt’
Incidence of Legal Burden: General rule
the prosecution bear the legal burden of proving all the elements in the offence necessary to establish guilt
Does P bear all elements of the legal burden, even if this involves proving negative averments?
Yes
The prosecution bear the burden of proving all the elements in the offence, even if this involves proving negative averments. Thus, in a case of rape the prosecution bear the burden of proving that the complainant did not consent (Horn (1912) 7 Cr App R 200).
Similarly, the prosecution bear the burden of proving absence of consent on a charge of assault
General rule about P having the legal burden: There are only three categories of exception to the general rule as laid down in Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462:
(a) insanity;
(b) express statutory exceptions; and
(c) implied statutory exceptions
Exception in Case of Defence of Insanity
If the accused raises the defence of insanity, the accused will bear the burden of proving it (on a balance of probabilities)
Criminal Procedure (Insanity)
Act 1964, s6
Insanity
If accused is charged with murder,
and raises one of two issues:
(a) Insanity; OR
(b) Diminished Responsibility
P can adduce evidence to disprove
either contention but must do so
BRD
D only needs to prove either on BOP
Insanity: If an accused is alleged to be under a disability rendering the accused unfit to plead and stand trial on indictment, the issue may be raised by either the prosecution or defence
P contends accused is under
disability and this is disputed by D
then it must be proved BRD by P
D contends accused is under
disability and this is disputed by P
then it must be proved on BOP by D
Express Statutory Exceptions
(Diminished Responsibility)
the onus is on the defence to prove it on a balance of probabilities