Disclosure Flashcards
The Statutory Regime and Common Law in regards to unused material
Set out in the CPIA 1996, Part I (ss.1 to 21)
Prior to the Statutory regime, it was common-law rules dictating this
- Following a number of high-profile miscarriages of justice which failure of disclosure played a part, this was developed
When does CPIA 1996 (DUTY TO DISCLOSE) begins/apply?
- The regime is compulsory in relation to cases sent to the Crown Court to be tried on indictment.
- The statutory duties begin with the arrival of the case (by whatever route) in the Crown Court (s. 1(2)) and end with the conclusion of the trial, whether by conviction, acquittal, or the discontinuation of proceedings (s. 7A(1)(b)).
Does disclosure obligation exist in summary trial?
Disclosure obligations now exist in relation to cases expected to be suitable for summary trial in which a not guilty plea is anticipated
The CPIA 1996 expressly provides that it displaces the common law in cases to which it applies save in respect of common-law rules governing whether disclosure is in the public interest (see s. 21 and D9.50).
- Common-law remains relevant
- that circumstances may arise in which a prosecutor may be required to disclose material to the defence outside the scheme of the CPIA 1996 (e.g., in connection with a bail application at an early stage, or following the conclusion of proceedings)
When considering disclosure obligations post-charge but prior to statutory obligation, prosecution should consider:
(1) o The right for a defendant to have adequate time and facilities to prepare the defence is also expressly protected by the ECHR, Article 6(3)(b).
(2) The essential consideration for a prosecutor is whether disclosure of any material to the defence is required in accordance with the interests of justice and fairness.
BASIC FAIRNESS
prosecution disclosure is a requirement of basic fairness
- Fairness ordinarily requires that any material held by the prosecution which weakens its case or strengthens that of the defendant, if not relied on as part of its formal case against the defendant, should be disclosed to the defence
There are stages to disclosure and level of disclosure changes
- It is important to note that while the principle of fairness informs the duty of disclosure at all stages of proceedings, it does not follow that fairness requires the same level of disclosure at each stage.
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
STAGE 1
- A statutory duty upon police officers
A statutory duty obliges police officers investigating an offence to record and retain all information and material, gathered or generated, that may be relevant to the investigation
+
Material which is relevant to the investigation but is not expected to form part of the prosecution case should be provided by the police to the prosecutor for review
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
STAGE 2
The prosecution must apply the statutory test in the CPIA 1996, s. 3
The prosecution must apply the statutory test in the CPIA 1996, s. 3, to that material and must disclose any material meeting that test, usually together with a schedule of all the other material recorded and retained
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
STAGE 3
The defence
The defence have a duty to inform the prosecution of the case which they intend to present at trial
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
STAGE 4
Prosecution’s continuing duty
Prosecution continuing duty to disclose material which meets the statutory test
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
STAGE 5
Accused’s right to make application
Following service of the defence statement and any further disclosure (or a failure to make further disclosure), an accused may make further applications for disclosure
The legislative regime under the CPIA 1996 envisages a staged approach to the disclosure of unused prosecution material and the defence case
Summary of stages
1- Investigation stage (A statutory duty upon police officers/investigators) + to reveal material to the Prosecution
2 - The prosecution must apply the statutory test in the CPIA 1996, s. 3
3 - The defence disclosure
4 - Prosecution’s continuing duty to keep disclosure under review
5- Accused’s right to make application
The disclosure provisions of Part I of the CPIA 1996 apply to any alleged offence for which a criminal investigation began on or after…
1 April 1997.
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
- this applies to
The CPIA Code applies to all criminal investigations carried out by police officers and persons other than police officers charged with the duty of conducting criminal investigations
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
Responsibilities of Investigators and Disclosure Officers
- Varying functions
- need to retain CLEAR records of the identities of the persons performing these roles
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
Key roles
an ‘investigator’ = any police officer involved in the conduct of a criminal investigation;
a ‘disclosure officer’ = the person responsible for examining material retained by the police during the investigation and for revealing material to the prosecutor;
and the ‘officer in charge of an investigation’ = the police officer responsible for directing a criminal investigation, including ensuring that proper procedures are in place for recording information, retaining records of information and other material in the investigation (para. 2.1).
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
Duty to Record and Retain Material
- Must record all info that is relevant to the investigation
This includes:
(1) Negative info
(2) Material’ includes material gathered in the course of the investigation (e.g., documents seized in the course of searching premises)
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
The CPIA Code expressly identifies that the duty to retain material will include, for example, the following categories of material:
- crime reports, including crime report forms, relevant parts of incident report books and police officers’ notebooks;
- final versions of witness statements; draft versions of witness statements where their content differs from the final version; interview records (written or taped);
- expert reports and schedules; any material casting doubt upon the reliability of a confession;
- and any material casting doubt on the reliability of a witness (para. 5.4).
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Investigation stage
The CPIA Code makes clear that the duty to retain material does not extend to…
items purely ancillary to the above categories which possess no independent significance, such as duplicates of documents
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
A list of material identified as likely to include information which meets the test for prosecution disclosure is set out at para. 6.6 of the CPIA Code.
(a) Crime Reports
(b) Custody Records
(c) Records (telephone messages etc)
(d) Final version of Witness Statements
(e) Interview Records
(f) Communications between police and experts
(g) Records of first description
(h) Any material casting doubt on the reliability of a witness
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
List of unused material: CC/MC
CC: Disclosure Officer prepares a schedule which individually lists the items of unused material
MC: where the accused is likely to plead not guilty, a streamlined disclosure certificate is prepared. It is these schedules which the prosecutor will review when making decisions as to whether material is to be disclosed to the defence, applying the relevant statutory test.
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
Sensitive material …
should be listed in a separate schedule or, exceptionally, disclosed to the prosecutor separately.
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
Sensitive material is defined
as material which the investigator believes would give rise to a real risk of serious prejudice to an important public interest if it were to be disclosed
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
Example of sensitive material
Ranging from
- material relating to national security
- material given in confidence,
- material relating to informants, undercover police officers, premises used for police surveillance,
- techniques used in the detection of crime,
- material relating to child witnesses (e.g.,
- material generated by a local authority social services department).
What information about the sensitive material should be mentioned in the ‘sensitive schedule’?
Investigators are to specify the reasons why:
- the material is sensitive,
- the degree of sensitivity attaching to the material,
- the consequences of revealing it to the defence,
- the significance of the material to the issues in the trial, the involvement of third parties in bringing the material to the attention of the police,
- the implications for continuance of the prosecution if disclosure is ordered, and
- whether it is possible to disclose the material without compromising its sensitivity.
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
Descriptions by disclosure officers in non-sensitive schedules
should be clear and accurate and must contain sufficient detail to enable the prosecutor to make an informed decision on disclosure
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
What about documents which might satisfy the test for prosecution disclosure?
might satisfy the test for prosecution disclosure
STAGE 1 of disclosure
Duty to Reveal Material to the Prosecutor
Disclosure officer’s certification
Disclosure officer must certify to the prosecutor that to the best of the officer’s knowledge and belief the duties imposed under the Code have been complied with
STAGE 2
The prosecution must apply the statutory test in the CPIA 1996, s. 3
THE TEST
Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s. 3
(1) The prosecutor must—
(a) disclose to the accused any prosecution material which has not previously been disclosed to the accused and which might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the case for the prosecution against the accused, or of assisting the case for the accused, or
so the statutory test is whether it might reasonably be considered capable of:
(a) undermining the case for the prosecution against the accused; or
(b) assisting the case for the accused.
STAGE 2
The prosecution’s disclosure
If there are is no disclosable material?
The accused must be given a written statement to that effect.
+ The court officer must be informed by the prosecutor at the same time
The prosecution’s disclosure
- objective test
- ongoing duty
- applied to documentation created (or received) by an accused and that documents said to be required for memory refreshing fell within its scope
- s. 3 does not require disclosure of material which is either neutral in effect or which is adverse to the accused, whether because it strengthens the prosecution or weakens the defence
The prosecution’s disclosure
Judicial Disclosure Protocol: don’t want trial process overburdened/diverted by
inappropriate disclosure of unused material;
the Judicial Protocol also warns that failure to disclose material to the defence =
remains the biggest single cause of miscarriages of justice.
- The A-G’s Guidelines set out some factors for a prosecutor to consider in deciding whether the s. 3 test is met for the purposes of initial disclosure in relation to any piece of material, including the following (para. 84):
(a) the use that might be made of the material in cross-examination;
(b) its capacity to support submissions that could lead to the exclusion of evidence, a stay of proceedings or a finding that any public authority had acted incompatibly with the accused’s rights under the ECHR;
(c) its capacity to suggest an explanation or partial explanation of the accused’s actions;
(d) its capacity to undermine the reliability or credibility of a prosecution witness;
(e) the capacity of the material to have n bearing on scientific or medical evidence in the case.
Material relating to the accused’s mental or physical health, intellectual capacity, or to any ill-treatment which the accused may have suffered in custody is said to be likely to fall within the test for disclosure
The duty relates to ‘Prosecution Material’, defined in s3(2) = material which the
prosecutor
(a) possesses; OR
(b) has inspected in connection with the case:
- Possesses = which is in the prosecution’s possession & came into his possession in connection with the case for the prosecution against the accused
- Inspected = which, in pursuance of the Disclosure Code of Practice, he has inspected in connection with the case for prosecution against the accused.
5 Preumsptions Re Disclosure Regime (R (2016), CA)
i. the prosecution are in driving seat re stage of primary disclosure
ii. prosecution must encourage dialogue and prompt engagement with the defence
iii. the law is prescriptive of the result of disclosure, not the method by which the
process should operate
iv. the process should be subject to robust case management by the judge, utilising full range of case management powers
v. flexibility is critical
Prosecution disclosure:
To add from R (2016) ,
Under the revised A-G’s Guidelines, there is an enhanced emphasis on the role of the defence
- to engage with the prosecution when prompted to do so
- to be clear at an early stage and notify the court if it is felt that the prosecution have not adequately discharged their obligations.
- the defence must not delay raising these issues until a late stage in the proceedings