UAM Flashcards
order of things to prove
1) d commits unlawful act
2) mens rea for initial act
3) act is dangerous
4) act causes death
stone and dobinson
-assuming responsibility
-act not ommission
franklin
must be criminal act, not civil
lamb
unlawful act must be complete
DPP v newsbury and jones
D doesnt have to predict harm
mitchell
transferred malice
pagett
-but for
-third party
smith
operative and substantial
roberts/williams
acts of a victim
dear
self neglect after injury doesnt break chain
cato
injected someone else - guilty
kennedy
set up needle - innocent
church test (dangerous)
SRP foresee some harm
dawson
emotional harm is not dangerous
R v JM and SM
dont need to foresee specific harm, just some
goodfellow
unlawful act can be towards property
R v fernon and ellis
always compared to SRP even if d is not one