consideration Flashcards
chappell v nestle
consideration must be sufficient not equal
jones v padvatton
giving something of value up can be consideration
white v bluett
love and affection is not good consideration
collins v godfroy
doing something required by law is not good consideration
stilk v myrick
doing an existing contractual duty is not good consideration
williams v roffey bros
an extra practical benefit can be good consideration
re mcardle
consideration cant be given in the past
lampleigh v braithwait
implied promise of consideration, very serious.
order of things to prove
1.sufficiency
2.existing duties
3.past consideration
4.consideration must be made from promissee.
thomas v thomas
consideration does not have to have equal value.
hartley v ponsonby
adding something extra, going beyond can be good consideration.