U.2: AP Gov Exam - Studying Flashcards
Legislative Branch
MAKES LAWS
Article I
Congress (Senate + house)
Congress
Senate + House
House of Representatives
435 members
APPORTIONED by population - 1 per district
2-year terms
CLOSER to people + more members = more FORMAL debate
Senate
6-year terms
2 Per State (NOT based on population)
so - 100 TOTAL
House of Representatives (Structures, Powers, Functions)
led by Speaker
+ other members - Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Whip (rounds up votes + ensures party discipline - vote according to your platform, not personal beliefs)
Senate (Structures, Powers, Functions)
VP = Senate leader by default - this is only a ceremonial role
Majority Leader ACTUALLY leads the Senate Minority Leader, Whips collect votes
Standing Committee (Committee Types)
PERMANENT in the Senate, there for consideration of PARTICULAR SUBJECT AREAS
Select Committee (Committee Types)
congressional committee appointed to perform a specific function BEYOND the capacity of a standing Committee
Conference Committee (Committee Types)
a temporary, ad hoc panel composed of House and Senate conferees formed for the purpose of reconciling differences in legislation that has passed both chambers.
Conference committees are usually convened to resolve bicameral differences on major or controversial legislation.
House Rules
all bills in House must pass in order for debate rules to be considered
Closed Rule : more strict
Open Rule : less strict
Process of a Bill Becoming Law
any legislator introduces –> sent to committee & subcommittee (may be pidgeonholed AKA die in committee) –> full CHAMBER vote –> sent to other house, if different bill versions passed –> Conference Committee if needed –> 10 days for president to sign/veto until it becomes law (if a president doesn’t sign within these 10 days, it’s called a pocket veto)
Federal Spending
DISCRETIONARY: (ex: military)
MANDATORY: (REQUIRED by law ; ex: social security)
Gerrymandering:
state legislatures dividing districts to influence ELECTIONS
SHAW V RENO and BAKER V CARR
Shaw v Reno
it’s unlawful to gerrymander on the basis of race
Creating a district / gerrymandering in order to have a minority leader in a district — not allowed; it’s gerrymandering on the basis of race
Gerrymandering - drawing the boundaries for an ELECTORAL district
Fourteenth Amendment: violated the Equal Protections Clause (by gerrymandering based on RACE)
Baker v Carr
Redistricting is for STATE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT LINES, not for ELECTORAL DISTRICTS like in Shaw v Reno
Asked the question : do federal courts have jurisdiction of state legislative apportionment?
Under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protections Clause
Moving from rural to cities caused populations in districts to be uneven
Charlie Baker said that this violated the Equal Protections Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - in such an unfairly large district, his voice wasn’t heard at all/was drowned out, he thought
ruling: redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
RULING: The Supreme Court decided in favor of Baker holding that the Federal courts have the authority to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection of the law against state officials if the state legislative districts are disproportionately populated
Joe Carr was the Secretary of the State of Tennessee