U.2: AP Gov Exam - Studying Flashcards

1
Q

Legislative Branch

A

MAKES LAWS

Article I

Congress (Senate + house)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Congress

A

Senate + House

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

House of Representatives

A

435 members
APPORTIONED by population - 1 per district
2-year terms

CLOSER to people + more members = more FORMAL debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Senate

A

6-year terms

2 Per State (NOT based on population)

so - 100 TOTAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

House of Representatives (Structures, Powers, Functions)

A

led by Speaker

+ other members - Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Whip (rounds up votes + ensures party discipline - vote according to your platform, not personal beliefs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Senate (Structures, Powers, Functions)

A

VP = Senate leader by default - this is only a ceremonial role

Majority Leader ACTUALLY leads the Senate Minority Leader, Whips collect votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Standing Committee (Committee Types)

A

PERMANENT in the Senate, there for consideration of PARTICULAR SUBJECT AREAS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Select Committee (Committee Types)

A

congressional committee appointed to perform a specific function BEYOND the capacity of a standing Committee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conference Committee (Committee Types)

A

a temporary, ad hoc panel composed of House and Senate conferees formed for the purpose of reconciling differences in legislation that has passed both chambers.

Conference committees are usually convened to resolve bicameral differences on major or controversial legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

House Rules

A

all bills in House must pass in order for debate rules to be considered

Closed Rule : more strict

Open Rule : less strict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Process of a Bill Becoming Law

A

any legislator introduces –> sent to committee & subcommittee (may be pidgeonholed AKA die in committee) –> full CHAMBER vote –> sent to other house, if different bill versions passed –> Conference Committee if needed –> 10 days for president to sign/veto until it becomes law (if a president doesn’t sign within these 10 days, it’s called a pocket veto)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federal Spending

A

DISCRETIONARY: (ex: military)

MANDATORY: (REQUIRED by law ; ex: social security)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gerrymandering:

A

state legislatures dividing districts to influence ELECTIONS

SHAW V RENO and BAKER V CARR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Shaw v Reno

A

it’s unlawful to gerrymander on the basis of race

Creating a district / gerrymandering in order to have a minority leader in a district — not allowed; it’s gerrymandering on the basis of race

Gerrymandering - drawing the boundaries for an ELECTORAL district

Fourteenth Amendment: violated the Equal Protections Clause (by gerrymandering based on RACE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Baker v Carr

A

Redistricting is for STATE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT LINES, not for ELECTORAL DISTRICTS like in Shaw v Reno

Asked the question : do federal courts have jurisdiction of state legislative apportionment?
Under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protections Clause

Moving from rural to cities caused populations in districts to be uneven
Charlie Baker said that this violated the Equal Protections Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - in such an unfairly large district, his voice wasn’t heard at all/was drowned out, he thought

ruling: redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.

RULING: The Supreme Court decided in favor of Baker holding that the Federal courts have the authority to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection of the law against state officials if the state legislative districts are disproportionately populated

Joe Carr was the Secretary of the State of Tennessee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Redlining

A

banks refuse to loan to certain residents

16
Q

Constituent Accountability

A

legislator is a DELEGATE (what the constituents want), a TRUSTEE (legislator’s judgement) or a POLITICO (mix of both)

17
Q

Commander in Chief (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

Commander in Chief, BUT Congress declares war

War Powers Act

18
Q

War Powers Act (Commander in Chief) (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

President must notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops, can stay 60 days w/o declaration

19
Q

Chief Diplomat (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

appoints ambassadors/negotiates treaties WITH Senate confirmation

Executive Agreement

20
Q

Executive Agreement (Chief Diplomat) (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

informal non-binding treaty

21
Q

Appointing Judges (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

President can APPOINT SUPREME COURT JUDGES - but (check) Senate MUST confirm

serve life to avoid political pressure

Also appoints Cabinet Members who are more loyal to departments

22
Q

Federalist 70 (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

Expansion of Powers

argues in favor of a UNITARY executive created by Article II of the United States Constitution

Relates to executive power and authority - one singular unitary executive

23
Q

22nd Amendment (Roles/Checks on Presidency)

A

Only 2 terms of presidency! (Not 4, like FDR!)

24
Q

Judicial Branch

A

INTERPRETS laws

Article III of the Constitution

25
Q

Structure of the Federal Court System

A

91 District Courts, 13 Courts of Appeal, SUPREME COURT

26
Q

Judicial Review

A

SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) – SCOTUS power to DECLARE ACTIONS BY OTHER BRANCHES UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Federalist 78

Marbury v Madison

27
Q

Federalist No. 78

A

Explains the process of Judicial Review

Says that federal courts have the power to decide if what congress is doing is constitutional or not

This is the supreme court’s most important power - the ability to interpret the constitution and, as such, strike down the actions of the actions of Congress, the president, and the states if those actions are deemed unconstitutional

28
Q

Marbury v Madison

A

definitively established judicial review

( Again: This is the supreme court’s most important power - the ability to interpret the constitution and, as such, strike down the actions of the actions of Congresss, the president, and the states if those actions are deemed unconstitutional )

In this case, it was the unconstitutional act of Secretary of State (under President Jefferson) Madison - refusing to deliver commissions to the new appointees of the supreme court

Did this because he didn’t like President Adam’s Judiciary Act of 1801, which expanded judicial courts (added many more judges/justices etc) - so he was like … well! I just won’t send them their commissions teehee :^) and then marbury, who didn’t get one, was like i hate you…… ALSO!! that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! and then the court AGREED to it established JUDICIAL REVIEW the end

For future cases - definitively established judicial review!!

29
Q

Precedent / Stare Decisis

A

SCOTUS generally bases decisions on previous rulings BUT can choose not to

EXAMPLE: Brown v Board of Education decided NOT to have precedent / Stare decisis for Plessy v Fergeson, which decided “seperate but equal”. they instead decided to OVERTURN Plessy v Fergeson

30
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

Overturned the “separate but equal” doctrine of segregation

Does state-mandated racial segregation in public schools violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Does the “separate but equal” doctrine set by Plessy v Ferguson violate the fourteenth amendment?

Are “separate but equal” educational facilities consitututionally permissible?

Brown family vs. Board of Education

PRECEDENT / STARE DECISIS - did not go by the Precedent / stare decisis of Plessy v Fergeson (seperate but equal) - instead overturned it

31
Q

Judicial Restraint

A

follow Constitution/Framers’ intent verbatim

32
Q

Judicial activism

A

contemporary interpretation

33
Q

Bureaucracy

A

Executive Branch

ENFORCES laws

34
Q

Examples of Bureaucracy

A

Cabinet, Independent Regulatory Agencies, Independent Executive Agencies

35
Q

Discretionary Authority

A

bureaucrats enforce laws as they see fit (Congressional Oversight)

36
Q

Congressional Oversight (discretionary Authority)

A

can restrict funding of Congress