U1-2. methods Flashcards

1
Q

hidsight bias

A

tendency upon hearing about research findings to think that they knew it all along

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

applied research

A

type of research that’s conducted to solve practical problems
- has clear & practical applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

basic resarch

A

explores questions that are of interest to psychologists but not intended to have immediate, real-world applications
(e.g.) how ppl in different cultures define intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hypothesis

A
  • expresses relationship btwn two variables (=things that can vary among participants)
  • experimental hypothesis: <dependent> depends on <independent></independent></dependent>
  • to test hypothesis, researchers manipulate IV & measure DV
  • often grown out of theories
  • PROVING hypothesis is IMPOSSIBLE: research rather aims to gather data that [supports/disapproves] hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

theory

A
  • aims to explain some phenomenon
  • allows researchers to generate testable hypothesis w/ hopes of collecting data to support the theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

operational definitions

A
  • what researchers need to provide
  • explains how you will measure it
  • raises many issues about validity & reliability of research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

validity

A

research is <valid> when it measures what the researcher set out to measure
-> when it is [accurate]</valid>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

reliability

A

research is <reliable> when it can be replicated
-> [consistent]
- when researcher conducts same research in the same way & gets similar results</reliable>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

participants

A

individuals on which research will be conducted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

sampling

A

process by which participants are selected
- to select a [sample] (=group of participants), one must first identify the [population] (=includes anyone/anything that could possibly be selected to be in the sample) from which sample will be selected
- goal: to be [representative] of larger population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

random selection

A

every member of population has equal chance of being selected
- increases likelihood that sample [represents] population & that one can [generalize] the findings to larger population
- best done by using a computer, table of numbers, or tried-and-true method of picking names out of a hat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

sample size

A
  • larger the sample, more likely it is to represent the population
    -> downside: time & money
  • research w/ [large] sample size, but not prohibitively(터무니없게) large is <optimal></optimal>
  • when asked in AP exam) <specify> sample size & avoid using extreme sample size</specify>
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

stratified (계층화된) sampling

A

process that ensures that sample represents population on [some criteria]
(e.g.) want to test difference of race -> each race should be represented in sample w/ <same> as overall population
-> first divide potential participants into groups based on race => pick random subsample of <desired> from each group</desired></same>

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

laboratory experiments

A

conducted in lab - highly controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

field experiment

A

conducted out in the world - more realistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

experiment

A

preferred bc only carefully controlled experiment can show causal relationship
- allows researchers to manipulate IV & control for confounding variable

17
Q

confounding variable

A

any diference between experimental & control conditions that may affect DV (except IV)

18
Q

assignment

A

process by which participants are put into a group

19
Q

random experiment

A

participants have equal change of being placed into any group -> controls for participant-relevant confounding variables

20
Q

group matching

A

ensures that experimental & control groups were equivalent on some criterion

21
Q

situation-relevant confounding variables

A

any difference in situations that different groups are put in

22
Q

experimenter bias

A

type of situation-relevant confounding variable
- unconscious tendency for researchers to treat members of experimental & control group differentely

23
Q

double-blind procedure

A

neither participants nor researchers afect outcome of research (removes experimenter bias)

24
Q

single blind

A

only participants don’t know which group they’ve been assigned to
- minimizes demand characteristics & response/subject bias

25
demand characteristics
cues (signals) about purpose of study
26
response/subject bias
tendency for participants to behave in certain ways (e.g. social desirability)
27
experimental group
group that gets treatement optionalized in IV
28
control group
gets none of IV -> serves as basis for comparison
29
hawthorne effect
participant's behavior changes bc of being observed not bc of IV
30
placebo method
important method of control
31
counterbalancing
using participants as their own control group - removes possibility of order effects (participants doing better on 2nd test bc they did 1st one) -> half of participants do 1st condition first while the other half does 2nd one first
32
correlation
relationship btwn two variables without assigning cause (!=causation)
33
positive correlation
presence of one thing predicts presence of another
34
negative correlation
presence of one predicts absence of another
35
quasi-experiment (Ex-facto study)
controls all other aspects of research besides predetermined IV - not assigned to random groups
36
survey method
asks to fill out surveys - no cause&effect relationship - no variables manipulated (no IV/DV) - no control for participant-relevant confounding variables -> researchers don't know which difference caused difference in DV - low response rate
37
naturalistic observation
researchers observe participants in natural habitat NOT field study, control is sacrificed
38
case study
full&detailed picture of one participant/small group - provides richest possible picture - findings can't be generalized