types of data Flashcards

1
Q

describe qualitative data

A
  • expressed in words
  • may take form of written description of thoughts, feelings & opinions of participants (or written account of what researcher observed)
  • eg. transcript from interview, extract from diary, notes recorded during counselling session
  • methods of data collection are those that are concerned with interpretation of language eg. from interview or unstructured observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

describe quantitative data

A
  • expressed numerically
  • collection techniques often gather numerical data from individual scores from participants eg. number of words person able to recall in memory experiment
  • data open to being analysed statistically & easily converted into graphs, charts etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe primary data (field research)

A
  • refers to original data that’s been collected specifically for purpose of investigation by researcher
  • first-hand from participants
  • gathered by conducting experiment, questionnaire, interview or observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe secondary data (‘desk research’)

A
  • collected by someone other than researcher
  • data already exists before psychologist begins research/investigation
  • sometimes data has already been subject to statistical testing & thus, significance is known
  • includes data in journal articles, books or websites
  • statistical information held by government (eg. census), population records or employee absence records within an organisation are examples of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AO3 - qualitative data

A

(+)
- offers researcher more richness of detail than quantitative data as much broader in scope & gives participant/respondent opportunity to fully report on thoughts, feelings & opinions on subject
- greater external validity as provides researcher with more meaningful insight into participants perspective

(-)
- difficult to analyse as doesn’t lend itself to being summarised statistically to allow patterns & comparisons within/between data to be identified
- conclusions often rely on subjective interpretations for research which may be subject to bias, particularly if researcher has preconceptions about what they’re expecting to find

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AO3 - quantitative data

A

(+)
- relatively simple to analyse, so comparisons between groups can be easily observed
- numerical data tends to be more objective & less open to bias from the researcher

(-)
- quantitative data is much narrower in meaning & detail, so may fail to represent ‘everyday life’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO3 - primary data

A

(+)
- fits the job as it is authentic data obtained from participants for purpose of certain investigation
eg. questionnaires/interviews can be designed so they specifically target information that the researcher requires

(-)
- producing primary data requires time & effort from the researcher
eg. conducting an experiment requires considerable planning, preparation & resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO3 - secondary data

A

(+)
- secondary data may be inexpensive & easily accessed which requires minimal effort
–> when examine secondary data the researcher may find the desired information already exists & so, there is no need to conduct collection primary data

(-)
- substantial variation between quality & accuracy of secondary data compared to primary data as information may appear valuable & promising but after further investigation, may be outdated & incomplete
–> this means the data may not match the researchers needs/objectives, which reduces the validity of any conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe meta-analysis

A
  • uses secondary data
  • number of studies are identified which have investigated same hypothesis/aim
  • results of studies can be pooled together to produce joint conclusion
  • in the case of experimental research, if independent variable has been measured the same way, a statistical analysis can be performed to calculate an effect size (DV of a meta-analysis)
    –> this gives an overall statistical measure of difference/relationship between variables across studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3 - meta-analysis

A

(+)
- allows us to create larger, more varied sample & results can then be generalised across much larger populations which increases validity

(-)
- prone to publication bias (file drawer problem) as the researcher may not select all relevant studies, and leave out studies with negative/non-significant results
–> thus, conclusions from meta-analysis will be biased as only represent some of relevant data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly